kef. 0 23-04-2003 12:28 ™ÂÏ›‰·4 Contents ¶ÂÚȯfiÌÂÓ· Acknowledgements 6 ∂˘¯·ÚÈÛٛ˜ Preface 9 ¶ÚfiÏÔÁÔ˜ 14 ∂ÈÛ·ÁˆÁ‹ Introduction PART I. Texts 4 ª∂ƒO™ I. ∫›ÌÂÓ· 1. Brief overview of how a school building is produced The primacy of SBO 20 22 1. ªÈÎÚ‹ ÂÈÛÎfiËÛË Ù˘ ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÔ‡ ÎÙÈÚ›Ô˘ ∏ ÚˆÙÔηı‰ڛ· ÙÔ˘ O™∫ 2. Educational intentions, Design intentions The ‘school-oriented’ library The ‘open’ library Shapes convey ideas (1) Rigidity / Flexibility Shapes convey ideas (2) The significance of the Library Location 26 30 32 35 37 39 42 2. ¶·È‰·ÁˆÁÈΤ˜ ÚÔı¤ÛÂȘ, ™¯Â‰È·ÛÙÈΤ˜ ÚÔı¤ÛÂȘ ∏ «Û¯ÔÏÈÎÔÔÈË̤ÓË» ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹ÎË ∏ «·ÓÔȯً» ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹ÎË Δ· Û¯‹Ì·Ù· ÌÂٷʤÚÔ˘Ó ÙȘ ȉ¤Â˜ (1) ∞ÓÂÏ·ÛÙÈÎfiÙËÙ· / ∂˘ÂÏÈÍ›· Δ· Û¯‹Ì·Ù· ÌÂٷʤÚÔ˘Ó ÙȘ ȉ¤Â˜ (2) ∏ ÚˆÙÂ‡Ô˘Û· ÛËÌ·Û›· Ù˘ ı¤Û˘ 3. The objectives, the functions and the space needs From planning to design The ‘official’ example Multiple standardization Naming spaces Fluid magnitudes A proposal for the shell 44 46 50 52 55 59 62 3. OÈ ÛÙfi¯ÔÈ, ÔÈ ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁ›Â˜ Î·È Ô ¯ÒÚÔ˜ ∞fi ÙÔÓ ÚÔÁÚ·ÌÌ·ÙÈÛÌfi ÛÙÔ Û¯Â‰È·ÛÌfi ΔÔ «Â›ÛËÌÔ» ·Ú¿‰ÂÈÁÌ· ∏ Ù˘ÔÔ›ËÛË ÛÙÔ ÔÏÏ·Ï¿ÛÈÔ ∏ ÔÓÔÌ·ÙÔ‰fiÙËÛË ÙˆÓ ¯ÒÚˆÓ Δ· Ú¢ÛÙ¿ ÌÂÁ¤ıË M›· ÚfiÙ·ÛË ÁÈ· ÙÔ Î¤Ï˘ÊÔ˜ 4. Furniture as space ‘Open’ furnishings ‘Accordion’ furniture ‘Drawer’ furniture Variable structures 66 68 70 71 73 4. ∏ ›ψÛË ˆ˜ ¯ÒÚÔ˜ ∏ «·ÓÔȯً» ›ψÛË ∏ ›ψÛË-·ÎÔÚÓÙÂfiÓ ∏ ›ψÛË-Û˘ÚÙ¿ÚÈ ªÂÙ·‚ÏËÙ¤˜ ‰Ô̤˜ 5. The Library: a space for Communication and Information 76 5. ∏ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹ÎË: ¯ÒÚÔ˜ ÂÈÎÔÈÓˆÓ›·˜ Î·È ÏËÚÔÊÔÚ›·˜ kef. 0 23-04-2003 12:28 ™ÂÏ›‰·5 PART II. Case Studies ª∂ƒO™ II. ¶·Ú·‰Â›ÁÌ·Ù· – ∂Ê·ÚÌÔÁ¤˜ 6. ∫·ÙËÁÔÚÈÔÔ›ËÛË ÙˆÓ ·Ú·‰ÂÈÁÌ¿ÙˆÓ ¶·ÚÔ˘Û›·ÛË A. ÃøƒOπ-∫∂§Yº∏ ∞1. ¶ÂÈÚ·Ì·ÙÈÎfi §‡ÎÂÈÔ ª˘ÙÈÏ‹Ó˘ ∞2. °˘ÌÓ¿ÛÈÔ μÔÏÈÛÛÔ‡ Ã›Ô˘ ∞3. ∂. §‡ÎÂÈÔ ∫‡Ì˘ ∂‡‚ÔÈ·˜ 84 6. Grouping and presentation of the Case Studies 90 92 94 A. SHELL SPACES A1. Mytilini-Lesbos Experimental Senior High School A2. Volissos-Chios Junior High School A3. Kymi-Evia Senior High School 96 98 100 102 104 B. ROOMS - CLASSROOMS B1. Kampos-Chios Junior High School B2. Gera-Lesbos Senior High School Ba. Type A of MNERA Specifications Bb. Type B of MNERA Specifications Bc. Type C of MNERA Specifications C. ÃøƒOπ ª∏ ΔÀ¶π∫OI C1. 1Ô Δ¯ÓÈÎfi §‡ÎÂÈÔ Ã·ÏΛ‰·˜ C2. 1Ô ∂. §‡ÎÂÈÔ Ã·ÏΛ‰·˜ C3. 7Ô °˘ÌÓ¿ÛÈÔ ƒfi‰Ô˘ C4. ∂. §‡ÎÂÈÔ ™¿ÌÔ˘ C5. ∂. §‡ÎÂÈÔ ª‡ÚÈÓ·˜ §‹ÌÓÔ˘ 106 110 112 114 116 C. NON-TYPICAL SPACES C1. Halkida-Evia 1st Techn. S. High School C2. Halkida-Evia 1st Senior High School C3. Rhodes 7th Junior High School C4. Samos Senior High School C5. Myrina-Limnos Senior High School ¶·Ú¿ÚÙËÌ· 1 ™¯¤‰È· ›ψÛ˘ 118 Appendix 1 Furniture drawings ¶ËÁ¤˜ ÂÈÎÔÓÔÁÚ¿ÊËÛ˘ 124 Source of figures ¶›Ó·Î·˜ ™˘ÓÙÔ̇ÛÂˆÓ 125 Acronyms used ∂ÈÏÂÁ̤ÓË μÈ‚ÏÈÔÁÚ·Ê›· 126 Selected Bibliography B. ∞π£OÀ™∂™-Δ∞•∂π™ μ1. °˘ÌÓ¿ÛÈÔ ∫¿ÌÔ˘ Ã›Ô˘ μ2. ∂. §‡ÎÂÈÔ °¤Ú·˜ §¤Û‚Ô˘ μa. Δ‡Ô˜ ∞ ÚԉȷÁÚ·ÊÒÓ À¶∂¶£ μb. Δ‡Ô˜ μ ÚԉȷÁÚ·ÊÒÓ À¶∂¶£ μc. Δ‡Ô˜ ° ÚԉȷÁÚ·ÊÒÓ À¶∂¶£ 5 [απόσπασμα] 1 Brief overview of how a school building is produced ªÈÎÚ‹ ÂÈÛÎfiËÛË Ù˘ ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÔ‡ ÎÙÈÚ›Ô˘ WHAT IS the general educational framework in ¶OπO ∂I¡∞π ™Δ∏¡ ∂§§A¢∞ ÙÔ Û¯ÔÏÈÎfi Î·È ÁÂÓÈÎfi- Greece within which it is directed that 500 libraries ÙÂÚ· ÙÔ ÂÎ·È‰Â˘ÙÈÎfi Ï·›ÛÈÔ Ì¤Û· ÛÙÔ ÔÔ›Ô Î·- are to be integrated into secondary schools all at ÏÔ‡ÓÙ·È Ó· ÂÓÙ·¯ıÔ‡Ó ÌÂÌÈ¿˜ 500 Û¯ÔÏÈΤ˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹- once, with the prospect of this figure doubling in Θ ÛÙË ¢Â˘ÙÂÚÔ‚¿ıÌÈ· Âη›‰Â˘ÛË; ªÂ ÚÔÔÙÈ΋ the immediate future? What is the accumulated Ì¿ÏÈÛÙ· Ó· ‰ÈÏ·ÛÈ·ÛÙÔ‡Ó ÛÙ· ·Ì¤Ûˆ˜ ÂfiÌÂÓ· experience that will support these libraries and ¯ÚfiÓÈ·; ¶ÔÈ· Â›Ó·È Ë Û˘ÛÛˆÚÂ˘Ì¤ÓË ÂÌÂÈÚ›· Ô˘ what traditions of operation and practice will they be enriching? These questions are more literary than substantial, since the picture of Greek schools shows very few active libraries. The space earmarked for libraries in the schools built during the past 20 years is usually used to cover the ÎÙÈ΋˜ ¤Ú¯ÔÓÙ·È ÔÈ Ó¤Â˜ ·˘Ù¤˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˜ Ó· ÂÌÏÔ˘Ù›ÛÔ˘Ó; Δ· ·Ú·¿Óˆ ÂÚˆÙ‹Ì·Ù· ηٷϋÁÔ˘Ó ÙÂÏÈο Ó· Â›Ó·È ÂÚÈÛÛfiÙÂÚÔ «ÊÈÏÔÏÔÁÈο» ·Ú¿ Ô˘ÛÈ·ÛÙÈο, ·ÊÔ‡ Ë ÂÈÎfiÓ· Ô˘ ·ÚÔ˘ÛÈ¿˙ÂÈ Ë ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹ÎË ÛÙÔ ÂÏÏËÓÈÎfi Û¯ÔÏÂ›Ô Â›Ó·È Û ·‰Ú¤˜ ÁÚ·Ì̤˜ Ë ÂÍ‹˜: ÔÈ ÂÓÂÚÁ¤˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˜ Â›Ó·È ÂÏ¿¯ÈÛÙ˜. OÈ immediate teaching needs arising from lack of ÚÔ‚ÏÂfiÌÂÓÔÈ ¯ÒÚÔÈ ‚È‚ÏÈÔıËÎÒÓ ÛÙ· Û¯ÔÏ›· sufficient classroom space. The books have been Ù˘ ÙÂÏÂ˘Ù·›·˜ ÂÈÎÔÛ·ÂÙ›·˜ ηχÙÔ˘Ó ÙÂÏÈο ¿ÌÂ- moved to cases in secondary areas, corridors and Û˜ ‰È‰·ÎÙÈΤ˜ ·Ó¿ÁΘ ÏfiÁˆ ¤ÏÏÂȄ˘ ·ÈıÔ˘ÛÒÓ. teachers’ offices. Δ· ‚È‚Ï›· ¤¯Ô˘Ó ÂÎÙÔÈÛÙ› Û ÚÔı‹Î˜ Û ‰Â˘ÙÂ- The result – and the cause simultaneously – of the deterioration of the school library is that 20 ÙȘ ÛÙËÚ›˙ÂÈ Î·È ÔÈ· ·Ú¿‰ÔÛË ÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁ›·˜ Î·È Ú·- Ú‡ÔÓÙ˜ ¯ÒÚÔ˘˜, Û ‰È·‰ÚfiÌÔ˘˜ Î·È Û ÁÚ·Ê›· ηıËÁËÙÒÓ. teaching is overwhelmingly based on just one ΔÔ ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· –Î·È ÙÔ ·›ÙÈÔ Ì·˙›– Ù˘ ··Í›ˆ- textbook without resort to any bibliographical Û˘ Î·È Ù˘ η¯ÂÍ›·˜ ÙÔ˘ ıÂÛÌÔ‡ Ù˘ Û¯ÔÏÈ΋˜ ‚È- sources. In addition, teaching methods have ‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˘ Â›Ó·È Ë ÛÙ‹ÚÈÍË Ù˘ ‰È‰·Ûηϛ·˜ ÛÙÔ ¤Ó· MIKPH E¶I™KO¶H™H […] BRIEF OVERVIEW […] Î·È ÌÔÓ·‰ÈÎfi Û¯ÔÏÈÎfi ÂÁ¯ÂÈÚ›‰ÈÔ Î·È Ë ·Ô˘Û›· Û‡Ó- remained largely teacher-centred and do not foster ‰ÂÛ‹ Ù˘ Ì ÙË ‚È‚ÏÈÔÁÚ·ÊÈ΋ ¤Ú¢ӷ. ∂›Ó·È ·ÎfiÌ· ÔÈ the development of skills in seeking knowledge or ‰È‰·ÎÙÈΤ˜ ̤ıÔ‰ÔÈ ÔÈ Ôԛ˜ ·Ú·Ì¤ÓÔ˘Ó Î·Ù¿ ‚¿- the cultivation of critical thought. ÛË ‰·ÛηÏÔÎÂÓÙÚÈΤ˜ Î·È ‰ÂÓ ÚÔˆıÔ‡Ó ÙËÓ ·Ó¿Ù˘- This picture of the deserted school library ÍË ‰ÂÍÈÔÙ‹ÙˆÓ ·Ó·˙‹ÙËÛ˘ Î·È ÙËÓ Î·ÏÏȤÚÁÂÈ· Ù˘ comes as no surprise, since the state of non- ÎÚÈÙÈ΋˜ ÛΤ„˘. school libraries is equally forlorn. The library as an ∞˘Ù‹ Ë ÂÈÎfiÓ· Ì·Ú·ÛÌÔ‡ Ù˘ Û¯ÔÏÈ΋˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˘ ‰ÂÓ ·ÔÙÂÏ› ¤ÎÏËÍË, fiÙ·Ó ÙÔ ÙÔ›Ô ÁÈ· ÙȘ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˜ ÂÎÙfi˜ Û¯ÔÏ›Ԣ Â›Ó·È ÂÍ›ÛÔ˘ ¿Ó˘‰ÚÔ. ∏ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹ÎË ˆ˜ ıÂÛÌfi˜ Î·È Ú·ÎÙÈ΋ Â›Ó·È ·Ó·Ú΋˜ ÛÙËÓ ÂÏÏËÓÈ΋ ÎÔÈÓˆÓ›·. OÈ ‰ËÌfiÛȘ Î·È ‰ËÌÔÙÈΤ˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˜ ˘ÔÏÂÈÙÔ˘ÚÁÔ‡Ó ÂÏÏ›„ÂÈ fiÚˆÓ, Î·È ·˘Ù¤˜ ·ÎfiÌ· ÔÈ ·ÓÂÈÛÙËÌȷΤ˜ ‰ÂÓ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ÙËÓ ·ÍÈÔ- institution and practice is ineffective in Greek society. Public and municipal libraries underfunction due to a lack of funds, and even university libraries are not utilised as befits them, since they are not considered an essential part of the teaching process even in higher education. The Ô›ËÛË Ô˘ ÙÔ˘˜ ·ÚÌfi˙ÂÈ, ·ÊÔ‡ Ô‡Ù ÛÙËÓ TÚÈÙÔ‚¿ı- most indicative symptoms of the lack of ÌÈ· Âη›‰Â˘ÛË ÂÓÙ¿ÛÛÔÓÙ·È Ô˘ÛÈ·ÛÙÈο ÛÙË ‰È‰·- institutions, structures and practices on which the Ûηϛ·. Δ· Û˘Ì‚ÔÏÈÎfiÙÂÚ· Û˘ÌÙÒÌ·Ù· ·˘Ù‹˜ Ù˘ library relies are that: ¤ÏÏÂȄ˘ ıÂÛÌÒÓ, ‰ÔÌÒÓ Î·È Ú·ÎÙÈÎÒÓ ÔÈ Ôԛ˜ ÛÙËÚ›˙Ô˘Ó ÙË ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹ÎË Â›Ó·È: ∏ ‰È‰·Ûηϛ· ÛÙ· ¶·ÓÂÈÛÙ‹ÌÈ· ‚·Û›˙ÂÙ·È ÛÙÔ Û‡ÁÁÚ·ÌÌ· ÙÔ˘ ηıËÁËÙ‹. ∏ ∂ıÓÈ΋ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹ÎË ‚Ú›ÛÎÂÙ·È Û ÂÁηٿÏÂÈ„Ë Ì ··Ú¯·ÈˆÌ¤ÓË ˘Ô‰ÔÌ‹. University courses are often taught on the basis of the book written by the professor. The National Library is in a state of dilapidation with outdated infrastructure. These observations have been noted in conferences, in seminars and in the relevant OÈ ·Ú·¿Óˆ ‰È·ÈÛÙÒÛÂȘ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ηٷÁÚ·Ê› Û literature. But the object of this chapter is not to ËÌÂÚ›‰Â˜, Û˘Ó¤‰ÚÈ· Î·È ÛÙË Û¯ÂÙÈ΋ ‚È‚ÏÈÔÁÚ·Ê›·. ΔÔ attempt a historic review of the institution of the ·ÓÙÈΛÌÂÓÔ ·˘ÙÔ‡ ÙÔ˘ ÎÂÊ·Ï·›Ô˘ ‰ÂÓ Â›Ó·È Ë ÈÛÙÔÚÈ΋ library, nor to analyse the reasons why it remains ÂÈÛÎfiËÛË ÙÔ˘ ıÂÛÌÔ‡ Ù˘ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˘ Ô‡ÙÂ Ë ·Ó¿- marginalised in a contemporary society. The Ï˘ÛË ÙˆÓ ·ÈÙ›ˆÓ ÁÈ· Ù· ÔÔ›· Û ÌÈ· Û‡Á¯ÚÔÓË ÎÔÈÓˆ- questions raised are: despite the inadequate local Ó›· Ô ıÂÛÌfi˜ ·˘Ùfi˜ ·Ú·Ì¤ÓÂÈ ÛÙÔ ÂÚÈıÒÚÈÔ. Δ· experience, can design be governed by more ÂÚˆÙ‹Ì·Ù· Ô˘ Ù›ıÂÓÙ·È Â›Ó·È: ÌÔÚ› Ô Û¯Â‰È·ÛÌfi˜, ·Ú¿ ÙËÓ ÂÏÏÈ‹ ÙÔÈ΋ ÂÌÂÈÚ›·, Ó· ‰È¤ÂÙ·È ·fi ÙȘ ÈÔ Û‡Á¯ÚÔÓ˜ ·ÓÙÈÏ‹„ÂȘ; ∏ Ì·˙È΋ ηٷÛ΢‹ ÂÓfi˜ Ù‡Ô˘ ÎÙÈÚ›Ô˘ (fiˆ˜ Ù· Û¯ÔÏÈο ÎÙ›ÚÈ· Î·È ÔÈ Û¯ÔÏÈΤ˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˜) ·ÔÙÂÏ› ÙÚÔ¯Ô¤‰Ë ‹ ηı›ÛÙ·Ù·È ·ÊÔÚÌ‹ ÁÈ· ¤Ó· Û‡Á¯ÚÔÓÔ Û¯Â‰È·ÛÌfi; O ÙÚfiÔ˜ ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹˜ ÂÓfi˜ Ù‡Ô˘ ÎÙÈÚ›Ô˘ ÔÚ›˙ÂÈ ÙË ÌÔÚÊ‹ ÙÔ˘; 1 modern ideas? Does the mass construction of a type of building (such as school buildings or school libraries) constitute a hindrance or does it provide an opportunity for modern design? Does the mode of production of a type of building define its form? 21 RE DESIGNING LIBRARIES FOR SCHOOLS The primacy of SBO ∏ ÚˆÙÔηı‰ڛ· ÙÔ˘ O™∫ The production of school buildings in Greece is ∏ ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹ ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÔ‡ ÎÙÈÚ›Ô˘ ÛÙËÓ ∂ÏÏ¿‰· ÂÔ- overseen by the School Buildings Organisation Ù‡ÂÙ·È ·fi ÙÔÓ O™∫ ÛÙȘ ·ÚÌÔ‰ÈfiÙËÙ˜ ÙÔ˘ ÔÔ›Ô˘ (SBO, also known as OSK as per the Greek ÂÚÈÏ·Ì‚¿ÓÂÙ·È Î·È Ë Û‡ÓÙ·ÍË Ù¯ÓÈÎÒÓ ÚԉȷÁÚ·- acronym), whose responsibilities include drawing ÊÒÓ. ª¤¯ÚÈ ÙÔ 1991, ÔfiÙ ÛËÌ·ÓÙÈΤ˜ ·ÚÌÔ‰ÈfiÙËÙ˜ up technical specifications. Up to 1991, when ÌÂٷʤÚÔÓÙ·È ÛÙËÓ ΔÔÈ΋ ∞˘ÙÔ‰ÈÔ›ÎËÛË, Ô O™∫ significant competencies were transferred to local ÂϤÁ¯ÂÈ Û¯Â‰fiÓ ÂÍ ÔÏÔÎÏ‹ÚÔ˘ ÙÔÓ ÚÔÁÚ·ÌÌ·ÙÈÛÌfi, government, SBO had almost exclusive control of ÙË ÌÂϤÙË Î·È ÙËÓ Î·Ù·Û΢‹ ÙˆÓ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÒÓ ÎÙÈÚ›ˆÓ. the planning, design and construction of school ∫·È Û‹ÌÂÚ· fï˜, ‰È·ÙËÚÒÓÙ·˜ Ï‹Úˆ˜ ÙȘ ·ÚÌÔ- buildings. Even today, when it retains all its ‰ÈfiÙËÙ¤˜ ÙÔ˘ ÛÙËÓ ∞ÙÙÈ΋ (fiÔ˘ ηÙÔÈΛ Ô ÌÈÛfi˜ ÏË- competencies in Athens and the department of ı˘ÛÌfi˜ Ù˘ ¯ÒÚ·˜) Î·È Î·Ù¤¯ÔÓÙ·˜ ¤Ó·Ó ÚfiÏÔ Û˘Ì- Attica (home of half the population of Greece) and ‚Ô‡ÏÔ˘ ÁÈ· ÙËÓ ˘fiÏÔÈË ¯ÒÚ·, Û˘Ó¯›˙ÂÈ Ó· ηıÔÚ›- plays the role of counsellor to the rest of the ˙ÂÈ ÙË ÌÔÚÊ‹ ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏ›Ԣ ÛÙËÓ ∂ÏÏ¿‰·. OÈ Úԉȷ- country, it continues to determine the shape of Áڷʤ˜ Ô˘ Û˘ÓÙ¿ÛÛÂÈ Â›Ó·È ˘Ô¯ÚˆÙÈΤ˜ ÁÈ· ÙËÓ schools in Greece. The specifications it lays down ÂÎÙ¤ÏÂÛË ÂÓfi˜ ¤ÚÁÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏÈ΋˜ ÛÙ¤Á˘. ∂ÎÔÓ› ‰Â for constructing a school building project are ÌÂϤÙ˜ fi¯È ÌfiÓÔ ÁÈ· ÙËÓ ∞ÙÙÈ΋ ·ÏÏ¿ Î·È ÁÈ· ÙËÓ ˘fi- obligatory. And it draws up designs not only for ÏÔÈË ¯ÒÚ· ÔÏϤ˜ ·fi ÙȘ Ôԛ˜ ‚·Û›˙ÔÓÙ·È Û ¤Ó· Attica, but for the rest of the country as well, many ·Ú¯Â›Ô Ù˘ÔÔÈËÌ¤ÓˆÓ ÎÙÈÚ›ˆÓ. ∂ÎÔÓ› ÌÂϤÙ˜ Û˘- of which are based on a stockpile of standardised ÌÏËڈ̷ÙÈÎÒÓ ¤ÚÁˆÓ ÁÈ· Ù· Û¯ÔÏ›· Î·È ·fi ÙȘ designs. It also conducts studies for 500 Û¯ÔÏÈΤ˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˜ Ù˘ ‰ÈÂÙ›·˜ 1999-2000 η- supplementary school projects, having constructed Ù·Û΢¿˙ÂÈ ÙȘ 218. 218 of the 500 school libraries built in 1999-2000. Given the SBO’s position as general technical ∞fi ÙË ı¤ÛË ÏÔÈfiÓ Ù˘ ÁÂÓÈ΋˜ Ù¯ÓÈ΋˜ ‰ÈÔÈÎËÙÈ΋˜ Î·È ÔÈÎÔÓÔÌÈ΋˜ ÂÔÙ›·˜ Ô˘ Ô O™∫ η٤¯ÂÈ administrator and financial supervisor with respect Û fi,ÙÈ ·ÊÔÚ¿ ÙËÓ ÎÙÈÚȷ΋ ˘Ô‰ÔÌ‹ Î·È ÙÔÓ ÂÍÔÏÈ- to school buildings and equipment, and its position ÛÌfi ÙˆÓ Û¯ÔÏ›ˆÓ, ·ÏÏ¿ Î·È ·fi ÙË ı¤ÛË ÙÔ˘ Û˘ÓÙ¿- as drafter of specifications and designs, it clearly ÎÙË ÚԉȷÁÚ·ÊÒÓ Î·È ÌÂÏÂÙÒÓ ·Ó·‰ÂÈÎÓ‡ÂÙ·È ˆ˜ Ô has the only substantial input guiding ideas about ÌfiÓÔ˜ Ô˘ÛÈ·ÛÙÈÎfi˜ ·Ú¿ÁÔÓÙ·˜ Ô˘ ηÙ¢ı‡ÓÂÈ ÙËÓ school-related space, on both the planning and ·ÓÙ›ÏË„Ë ÁÈ· ÙÔ Û¯ÔÏÈÎfi ¯ÒÚÔ, ÙfiÛÔ ÛÂ Â›Â‰Ô ÚÔ- construction level. ÁÚ¿ÌÌ·ÙÔ˜ fiÛÔ Î·È ÛÂ Â›Â‰Ô ‰ÔÌ‹˜ ÙÔ˘ ¯ÒÚÔ˘. In this way, the decentralisation of school 22 ANA™Ã∂¢π∞∑√¡Δ∞™ Δ∏ μπμ§π√£∏∫∏ ™Δ√ ™Ã√§∂π√ ∏ ·ÔΤÓÙÚˆÛË, ÛÙÔÓ ÙÔ̤· ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÔ‡ ÎÙÈÚ›Ô˘, buildings has not led to an influx of new ideas and ‰ÂÓ ¤¯ÂÈ ·Ô‰ÒÛÂÈ Û ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹ Ó¤ˆÓ ȉÂÒÓ Î·È practices for school facilities. No schools have Ú·ÎÙÈÎÒÓ ÁÈ· ÙÔ Û¯ÔÏÈÎfi ¯ÒÚÔ. ¢ÂÓ ¤¯Ô˘Ó ηٷ- been built that raise new issues of concern to Û΢·ÛÙ› Û¯ÔÏ›· Ù· ÔÔ›· Ó· ı¤ÙÔ˘Ó Ó¤Ô˘˜ ÚÔ- educators or provide space to serve them. ‚ÏËÌ·ÙÈÛÌÔ‡˜ ÁÈ· ÙȘ ·È‰·ÁˆÁÈΤ˜ ·ÓÙÈÏ‹„ÂȘ Î·È Decentralisation has not produced, at least not yet, Ó· ·Ú¤¯Ô˘Ó ÙÔ ¯ÒÚÔ Ô˘ ÙȘ Â͢ËÚÂÙ›. ∏ ·ÔΤ- even architectural designs with interest or dynamic ÓÙÚˆÛË ‰ÂÓ ·¤‰ˆÛÂ, ÙÔ˘Ï¿¯ÈÛÙÔÓ fi¯È ·ÎfiÌ·, Ô‡Ù proposals. Also lacking are ideas that might have ÛÙÔ Â›Â‰Ô ÙˆÓ ·Ú¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈÎÒÓ ÚÔÙ¿ÛÂˆÓ ÔÈ Ôԛ˜ sparked dialogue about school resources, ı· ÌÔÚÔ‡Û·Ó Ó· ¤¯Ô˘Ó ÂӉȷʤÚÔÓÙ· Î·È ‰˘Ó·ÌÈÎfi including issues that could have placed the ¯·Ú·ÎÙ‹Ú·. ∞Ô˘ÛÈ¿˙Ô˘Ó fï˜ Î·È ÔÈ È‰¤Â˜ ÔÈ ÔÔ›- physical school environment in the context of ˜ ı· ÁÔÓÈÌÔÔÈÔ‡Û·Ó ¤Ó·Ó ‰È¿ÏÔÁÔ ÁÈ· ÙÔ Û¯ÔÏÈÎfi MIKPH E¶I™KO¶H™H […] BRIEF OVERVIEW […] ¯ÒÚÔ, ı· ÂÓ¤Ù·ÛÛ·Ó Ù· ˙ËÙ‹Ì·Ù· ÙÔ˘ ˘ÏÈÎÔ‡ ÂÚÈ- modern international concerns and sought an ‚¿ÏÏÔÓÙÔ˜ ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏ›Ԣ ÛÙÔÓ Û‡Á¯ÚÔÓÔ ‰ÈÂıÓ‹ ÚÔ- outlet in innovative applications. ‚ÏËÌ·ÙÈÛÌfi, ı· ·Ó·˙ËÙÔ‡Û·Ó ‰È¤ÍÔ‰Ô Û ηÈÓÔÙfi̘ ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÁ¤˜. A factor deterring the expression of a rich flow of ideas and their application to schools is the ∞Ó·ÛÙ·ÏÙÈÎfi˜ ·Ú¿ÁÔÓÙ·˜ ÛÙËÓ ¤ÎÊÚ·ÛË ÂÓfi˜ SBO’s nationwide inspection of building programs ÏÔ‡ÛÈÔ˘ Ú‡̷ÙÔ˜ ȉÂÒÓ Î·È ÛÙËÓ ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÁ‹ ÙÔ˘˜ and technical specifications, as well as its primacy ÛÙÔ ¯ÒÚÔ ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏ›Ԣ Â›Ó·È Ô ¤ÏÂÁ¯Ô˜, Û ÂıÓÈÎfi in the design of school buildings. This ›‰Ô, ·fi ÙÔÓ O™∫ ÙÔ˘ ÎÙÈÚÈÔÏÔÁÈÎÔ‡ ÚÔÁÚ¿Ì- centralisation of responsibilities in a gigantic public Ì·ÙÔ˜ Î·È ÙˆÓ Ù¯ÓÈÎÒÓ ÚԉȷÁÚ·ÊÒÓ, ηıÒ˜ Î·È Ë service leads to standardised buildings and ÚˆÙÔηı‰ڛ· ÙÔ˘ ÛÙȘ ÌÂϤÙ˜ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÒÓ ÎÙÈÚ›ˆÓ. bureaucratic structures and viewpoints that hinder ∞˘Ùfi˜ Ô Û˘ÁÎÂÓÙÚˆÙÈÛÌfi˜ ·ÚÌÔ‰ÈÔÙ‹ÙˆÓ Û ¤Ó·Ó ÁÈ- the expression and promotion of new ideas. The Á·Óو̤ÓÔ ÔÚÁ·ÓÈÛÌfi Ô‰ËÁ› ÛÂ Ù˘ÔÔ›ËÛË Ù˘ η- most recent attempts to bring the Greek school Ù·Û΢‹˜ Î·È Û ÁÚ·ÊÂÈÔÎÚ·ÙÈΤ˜ ‰Ô̤˜ Î·È ·ÓÙÈÏ‹- into line with international concerns – such as the „ÂȘ Ô˘ ‰˘Û¯ÂÚ·›ÓÔ˘Ó ÙËÓ ¤ÎÊÚ·ÛË Î·È ÚÔÒıËÛË community school or the redesign and flexibility of ÙˆÓ Ó¤ˆÓ ȉÂÒÓ. OÈ ÙÂÏÂ˘Ù·›Â˜ ·fiÂÈÚ˜ ÁÈ· ÂÓ·Ú- educational spaces – are in danger of being ÌÔÓÈÛÌfi ÙÔ˘ ÂÏÏËÓÈÎÔ‡ Û¯ÔÏ›Ԣ Ì ÙÔÓ ‰ÈÂıÓ‹ ÚÔ- stripped of all substance because they are ‚ÏËÌ·ÙÈÛÌfi, fiˆ˜ ÁÈ· ·Ú¿‰ÂÈÁÌ· ÙÔ ÎÔÈÓÔÙÈÎfi promoted centrally. Any adjustments carried out so Û¯ÔÏÂ›Ô (community school) ‹ Ô ·Ó·Û¯Â‰È·ÛÌfi˜ Î·È far have been superficial ones, and architecturally Ë Â˘ÂÏÈÍ›· ÛÙÔ˘˜ ÂÎ·È‰Â˘ÙÈÎÔ‡˜ ¯ÒÚÔ˘˜, ÎÈÓ‰˘Ó‡- at least, they are confined either to local stylistic Ô˘Ó Ó· ·ÔÁ˘ÌÓˆıÔ‡Ó ·fi ÙËÓ Ô˘Û›· ÙÔ˘˜, ÂÊfiÛÔÓ features or to an over-lay of elements transferred ÚÔˆıÔ‡ÓÙ·È Û˘ÁÎÂÓÙÚˆÙÈο. ªÂ ÙÔÓ ›‰ÈÔ ÙÚfiÔ Ô˘ from current international architecture. ¤ˆ˜ Û‹ÌÂÚ· ÔÈ ÚÔÛ·ÚÌÔÁ¤˜, fiÔ˘ ‰È·ÈÛÙÒÓÔÓÙ·È, The result of this centralisation on the structure Â›Ó·È ÂÈÊ·ÓÂȷΤ˜ Î·È ÛÙËÓ ·Ú¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈ΋ ÙÔ˘Ï¿¯È- and production of school space is that while ÛÙÔÓ ÙˆÓ Û¯ÔÏ›ˆÓ ÂÍ·ÓÙÏÔ‡ÓÙ·È Â›Ù Û ÌÔÚÊÔÏÔÁÈ- schools constitute by far the most widespread type ο ¯·Ú·ÎÙËÚÈÛÙÈο ÂÓfi˜ ÙÔÈÎÈÛÌÔ‡ ›Ù Û ÌÈ· ¤Ó- of public building, they are characterised by the ‰˘ÛË ·fi ÛÙÔȯ›· Ô˘ ÌÂٷʤÚÔÓÙ·È ·fi ÙË ‰ÈÂıÓ‹ least variety and interest. The small but ·Ú¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈ΋ ÂÈηÈÚfiÙËÙ·. architecturally rich output from the midwar years, ΔÔ ·ÔÙ¤ÏÂÛÌ· ÙÔ˘ Û˘ÁÎÂÓÙÚˆÙÈÛÌÔ‡ ÛÙË ‰ÔÌ‹ Î·È ÛÙËÓ ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹ ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÔ‡ ¯ÒÚÔ˘ Â›Ó·È ÙÔ and the mass-produced but architecturally interesting output of the early post-war period were Û¯ÔÏÂ›Ô Ó· ·ÔÙÂÏ› ÌÂÓ Ì·ÎÚ¿Ó ÙÔ ÔÏ˘ÏËı¤ÛÙÂ- followed in the last 30 years by an even more ÚÔ ‰ËÌfiÛÈÔ ÎÙ›ÚÈÔ, Ó· ¤¯ÂÈ fï˜ Ó· Âȉ›ÍÂÈ ÙË ÌÈ- mass-produced but homogeneous and ÎÚfiÙÂÚË ÔÈÎÈÏ›· Î·È ÙÔ ÏÈÁfiÙÂÚÔ ÂӉȷʤÚÔÓ. ΔË ÌÈ- architecturally indifferent set of school buildings. ÎÚ‹ ·ÏÏ¿ ·Ú¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈο ÏÔ‡ÛÈ· ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹ ÙÔ˘ ªÂ- One of the most characteristic examples of ÛÔÔϤÌÔ˘, ÙË Ì·˙È΋ ·ÏÏ¿ Ì ·Ú¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈÎfi ÂӉȷ- rigidity can be seen in the 500 school libraries ʤÚÔÓ ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹ Ù˘ ÌÂÙ·ÔÏÂÌÈ΋˜ ÂÚÈfi‰Ô˘ ·ÎÔ- project. Since just a small part of the school ÏÔ‡ıËÛÂ, Ù· ÙÂÏÂ˘Ù·›· ÙÚÈ¿ÓÙ· ¯ÚfiÓÈ·, ÌÈ· Ì·˙ÈÎfiÙ·- building was involved, school libraries could have ÙË ·ÏÏ¿ ÔÌÔÁÂÓÔÔÈË̤ÓË Î·È ·‰È¿ÊÔÚË ·Ú¯ÈÙÂÎÙÔÓÈ- been created using flexible and interesting ο ηٷÛ΢‹ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÒÓ ÎÙÈÚ›ˆÓ. 1 applications. But inertia prevailed on the part of the ŒÓ· ·fi Ù· ϤÔÓ ¯·Ú·ÎÙËÚÈÛÙÈο ·Ú·‰Â›ÁÌ·Ù· SBO and the Ministry, and stereotyped results were ‰˘Ûη̄›·˜ ˆ˜ ÚÔ˜ ÙËÓ ÚÔÒıËÛË Î·ÈÓÔÙfiÌˆÓ repeated. In drawing up the 1982 building program 23 RE DESIGNING LIBRARIES FOR SCHOOLS ANA™Ã∂¢π∞∑√¡Δ∞™ Δ∏ μπμ§π√£∏∫∏ ™Δ√ ™Ã√§∂π√ and specifications for schools13*, the SBO ·ÓÙÈÏ‹„ÂˆÓ Â›Ó·È Î·È ÙÔ ¤ÚÁÔ ÁÈ· ÙȘ 500 Û¯ÔÏÈΤ˜ ‚È- proposed a conventional type of school library. The ‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˜. ∞ÊÔÚÔ‡Û ¤Ó· ÌÈÎÚfi ÙÌ‹Ì· ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏÈÎÔ‡ same type was repeated in essence 20 years later, ÎÙÈÚ›Ô˘ Î·È ÁÈ· ·˘Ùfi Ë ‰ËÌÈÔ˘ÚÁ›· ÙˆÓ ™.μ. ı· ÌÔ- when it was more urgent for schools to open out to ÚÔ‡Û ӷ ÂÓÂÚÁÔÔÈ‹ÛÂÈ Â˘¤ÏÈÎÙ˜ Î·È ÂӉȷʤÚÔ˘- the surrounding community, when the role of the Û˜ ÂÊ·ÚÌÔÁ¤˜. ÀÂÚ›Û¯˘Û fï˜, ·fi ÏÂ˘Ú¿˜ library and its position in the educational process O™∫ Î·È À¶∂¶£, Ë ·‰Ú¿ÓÂÈ· Î·È Ë Â·Ó¿ÏË„Ë ÙÔ˘ ‹‰Ë have changed, when new technologies have ‰ÔÎÈÌ·Ṳ̂ÓÔ˘. O O™∫ Û˘ÓÙ¿ÛÛÔÓÙ·˜ ÙÔ 1982 ÙÔ Ù‡- introduced new practices, and when many years of ¯Ô˜ ÎÙÈÚÈÔÏÔÁÈÎÔ‡ ÚÔÁÚ¿ÌÌ·ÙÔ˜ Î·È ÚԉȷÁÚ·- international experience in the creation of library ÊÒÓ ÁÈ· Ù· Û¯ÔÏ›·13*, ÚÔÙ›ÓÂÈ Î·È ¤Ó·Ó Û˘Ì‚·ÙÈÎfi resources have been accumulated. The pressures Ù‡Ô Û¯ÔÏÈ΋˜ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˘. O ›‰ÈÔ˜ Ù‡Ô˜ ·ӷ- of time and mass production are in the end Ï·Ì‚¿ÓÂÙ·È ·˘ÙÔ‡ÛÈÔ˜ 20 ¯ÚfiÓÈ· ·ÚÁfiÙÂÚ·, fiÙ·Ó ÙÔ secondary factors in terms in a project’s quality. ¿ÓÔÈÁÌ· ÙÔ˘ Û¯ÔÏ›Ԣ ÚÔ˜ ÙÔÓ ÎÔÈÓˆÓÈÎfi ÂÚ›Á˘ÚÔ The most decisive factor in determining the content Â›Ó·È ÂÚÈÛÛfiÙÂÚÔ ÂÈÙ·ÎÙÈÎfi, fiÙ·Ó Ô ÚfiÏÔ˜ Ù˘ ‚È- of an intervention is the abundance of ideas and ‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˘ Î·È Ë ı¤ÛË Ù˘ ÛÙËÓ ÂÎ·È‰Â˘ÙÈ΋ ‰È·‰Èη- the exchange of views that go into it, and the Û›· ¤¯Ô˘Ó ·ÏÏ¿ÍÂÈ, fiÙ·Ó ÔÈ Ó¤Â˜ Ù¯ÓÔÏÔÁ›Â˜ ÂÓÂÚÁÔ- flexibility of the proposal that makes it open to ÔÈÔ‡Ó Ó¤Â˜ Ú·ÎÙÈΤ˜, fiÙ·Ó Ù¤ÏÔ˜ ÁÈ· ÙË ‰È·ÌfiÚʈ- fresh ideas and solutions. ÛË ÙÔ˘ ¯ÒÚÔ˘ Ù˘ ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˘ ¤¯ÂÈ ÚÔÛÙÂı› ÔÏ˘ÂÙ‹˜ ‰ÈÂıÓ‹˜ ÂÌÂÈÚ›·. ∏ ›ÂÛË ¯ÚfiÓÔ˘ Î·È Ë Ì·˙ÈÎfiÙËÙ· ÛÙËÓ ·Ú·ÁˆÁ‹ ÂÓfi˜ ¤ÚÁÔ˘ Â›Ó·È ÙÂÏÈο ‰Â˘ÙÂÚ‡ÔÓÙ˜ ·Ú¿ÁÔÓÙ˜ ÁÈ· ÙËÓ ÔÈfiÙËÙ¿ ÙÔ˘. ∂ΛÓÔ Ô˘ ηıÔÚ›˙ÂÈ ÂÚÈÛÛfiÙÂÚÔ ÙÔ ÂÚȯfiÌÂÓÔ Ì›·˜ ¤̂·Û˘ Â›Ó·È Ô ÏÔ‡ÙÔ˜ ÙÔ˘ ÚÔ‚ÏËÌ·ÙÈÛÌÔ‡ Î·È Ù˘ ·ÓÙ·ÏÏ·Á‹˜ ȉÂÒÓ Ô˘ ÙËÓ Ï·ÈÛÈÒÓÔ˘Ó, Ë Â˘ÂÏÈÍ›· ÛÙËÓ ÚÔÒıËÛË Î·È Ô ·ÓÔȯÙfi˜ ¯·Ú·ÎÙ‹Ú·˜ Ì›·˜ ÚfiÙ·Û˘, ÒÛÙ ӷ Â›Ó·È ‰ÂÎÙÈ΋ Û Ӥ˜ ȉ¤Â˜ Î·È ÚÔÛ·ÚÌÔÁ¤˜. * 24 The numbered notes refer to the bibliography at the back of the book. * ∏ ·Ú›ıÌËÛË ÙˆÓ ‚È‚ÏÈÔÁÚ·ÊÈÎÒÓ ·Ú·ÔÌÒÓ ·Ó·Ê¤ÚÂÙ·È ÛÙËÓ ·Ú›ıÌËÛË Ù˘ μÈ‚ÏÈÔÁÚ·Ê›·˜, ÛÙÔ Ù¤ÏÔ˜ ÙÔ˘ ‚È‚Ï›Ô˘. MIKPH E¶I™KO¶H™H […] BRIEF OVERVIEW […] 1 EÈÎ. 1.1 ™¯ÔÏÈÎfi ÎÙ›ÚÈÔ ·fi ÙÔÓ O™K Ù˘ ‰ÂηÂÙ›·˜ ÙÔ˘ 1980 ÁÈ· 240 Ì·ıËÙ¤˜ Ì ÚÔ‚ÏÂfiÌÂÓË ı¤ÛË ‚È‚ÏÈÔı‹Î˘ ÛÙËÓ Â›ÛÔ‰Ô. Fig. 1.1 School building designed by SBO in the 1980’s for 240 pupils with space provided for a library in the entrance. 25