L’esperienza degli IR Officer Jadran Trevisan IR manager Milano, 14 Giugno 2005 Eni nel mondo* Presenza in 70 paesi con ~ 400 imprese (300 all’estero) Exploration & Production EniPower Saipem S.p.A. Divisioni * Dati al 31 Dicembre 2004 Refining & Marketing Gas & Power Snam Rete Gas Snam Progetti S.p.A. Polimeri Europa S.p.A. Società controllate Dipendenti Capitale Investito Netto Ricavi Risultato operativo Risultato netto 71.000 43 miliardi di € 58 miliardi di € 12,5 miliardi di € 7,3 miliardi di € 2 Market capitalization: Eni vs Peers miliardi di US$ 361 218 208 144 115 105 76 30 Exxon BP RD/Shell Total CVX Eni Conoco Phillips Repsol YPF Sulla base delle quotazioni dell’8 giugno 2005 Tutte le società europee sono quotate sul mercato nazionale e su quello americano e di conseguenza redigono il 20F (USGAAP) 3 Maggiore affinità principi IFRS e USGAAP PRINCIPALI DIFFERENZE IT GAAP/US GAAP Definizione area consolidamento (Valutazione di Saipem e delle joint venture a patrimonio netto) Attività mineraria Imposte sul reddito differite e anticipate Ammortamenti Immobilizzazioni immateriali PRINCIPALI DIFFERENZE IFRS/US GAAP Rimanenze (ammesso il LIFO secondo gli USGAAP) Attività mineraria (gli IFRS ammetto il mantenimento del trattamento in essere ITGAAP) TFR (goodwill) Oneri finanziari Smantellamento e ripristino siti Altri fondi per rischi e oneri Contratti derivati 4 Criteri contabili adottati: confronto con i Peers Prima Dopo Società DOMESTIC GAAP USGAAP IFRS USGAAP Eni ITGAAP P P P L’uniformità dei principi Total FRGAAP P P P contabili adottati ExxonMobil USGAAP P Chevron USGAAP P RD/Shell NLGAAP P P P Repsol SPGAAP P P P BP UKGAAP P P P ConocoPhillips USGAAP facilita il confronto all’interno del settore in termini di: Indicatori industriali Indicatori finanziari P 5 Applicazione IFRS: criticità affrontate dalla funzione IR First application: • redazione situazione patrimoniale di apertura (1/1/2004) • restatement delle situazioni contabili esercizio 2004 Limitata conoscenza specifica da parte degli analisti finanziari Individuazione delle grandezze economico finanziarie più rilevanti ai fini dei modelli di valutazione degli analisti Le altre majors Oil & Gas hanno presentato con largo anticipo gli impatti della transizione agli IFRS (BP best practice) Scelta del timing presentazione transizione agli IFRS 6 Implementazione IAS “first application”: metodologia di lavoro Gennaio / Febbraio Riunioni interne Condivisione dati a criteri IFRS sulla base del 3° forecast 2004 1° Marzo Road Show: Anticipazione temi introduzione IFRS Marzo / Aprile Consuntivo 2004 Inizio revisione e analisi dati 2004 a criteri IFRS 7 Implementazione IAS “first application”: metodologia di lavoro 27 Aprile Conference Call Press release Predisposizione area dedicata nella pagina IR del sito istituzionale con documentazione specifica: • presentazione tematica • slide di back up • file excel con dati di dettaglio 1Q04 • press release 11 Maggio Presentazione risultati 1Q05 a principi IFRS 30 Maggio La PwC emette la relazione sulla revisione contabile sull’adozione degli IFRS 2ª metà Giugno Pubblicazione dati trimestrali del 2004 a principi IFRS 8 Transition to IFRS Marco Mangiagalli CFO Milan, 27th April, 2005 IFRS: Highlights No impact on group strategy and financial targets IFRS adoption review by external auditors almost completed Minor movement in cash generation No change on economic value More in line with USGAAP (20-F) IFRS implemented starting from 1st January 2005 with 2004 comparatives(*) (*) With regard to IAS 32 and IAS 39 (evaluation of financial instruments including derivatives contracts) Eni has chosen January 1, 2005, as transition date 10 IFRS – Impacts on Net Capital Employed as at 1st January 2004 and 2004 Net Result Review of assets’ useful life Inventories Higher financial charges capitalized Abandonment costs Employee termination benefits 41.9 + 2.6 Goodwill amortization Reclassification of extraordinary income/charges Deferred tax adjustments Saipem and joint ventures now equity method accounted (mainly E&P and E&OS) 44.5 - 0.2 7.3 (billion euro) 7.1 Net capital Employed 1st January 2004 2004 Net result ITGAAP IFRS ITGAAP IFRS 11 IFRS Main Impacts on Net Capital Employed as at 1st January 2004 Billion € 2.5 Overall +2.6 IAS 19 0.8 0.6 0.3 Review of useful life IAS 16 Inventory IAS 2 Financial charges capitalized IAS 23 Abadonment cost IAS 16 & 37 Employee benefits IAS 27/28 IAS 31 IAS 12 Saipem and JV now equity Deferred tax accounted adjustments -0.1 -0.5 -1.0 12 IFRS First Application: Review of Assets’ Useful Life Review (extension) of the useful life of transportation & distribution networks on a retrospective basis Lower net result related to higher amortization Main impact in G&P business No impact on cash generation 2.1 Snam Rete Gas 0.3 Italgas 0.1 Stoccaggi Gas (E&P) Group impact (billion euro) Opening 2004 net capital employed before tax +2.5 2004 operating result -0.1 2004 net result -0.05 Cash generation 13 IFRS First Application: Inventory From LIFO to weighted average costs Higher volatility on inventory valuation according to market scenario Main impact in R&M business No impact on cash generation 0.5 billion euro related to R&M business Group impact (billion euro) Opening 2004 net capital employed before tax +0.8 2004 operating result +0.3 2004 net result +0.2 Cash 14 IFRS First Application: Financial Charges Higher financial charges capitalized Negligible impact on net result (higher amortizations offset by lower financial charges) No impact on cash generation Group impact (billion euro) Opening 2004 net capital employed before tax 2004 operating result 2004 net result Cash +0.6 -0.05 negligible 15 IFRS First Application: Abandonment Costs Capitalization of abandonment costs (at present value) In line with US GAAP Impact on E&P business No impact on cash generation Group impact (billion euro) Opening 2004 net capital employed before tax +0.3 2004 operating result +0.2 2004 net result +0.1 Cash 16 IFRS First Application: Employee Termination Benefits Actuarial techniques for the provisions’ valuation Negligible impact on net result No impact on cash generation Group impact (billion euro) Opening 2004 net capital employed before tax 2004 net result Cash -0.1 negligible - 17 IFRS First Application: Goodwill Amortization No more goodwill amortization Impairment test at least on a yearly basis No asset write down following the first (million euro) adoption No impact on cash generation Inpact on operating result Italgas: +43 Lasmo: +18 61 Impact on net income from investments GALP: +106 Saipem SA +20 UFG: +10 GVS +8 144 Overall impact 205 Group impact (billion euro) Opening 2004 net capital employed before tax 2004 net result Cash +0.2 18 IFRS First Application: Saipem and Joint Venture now Equity accounted for Main impact on Engineering & Oilfield Services and Exploration & Production Divisions Minor impact on cash generation Group impact (billion euro) Opening 2004 net capital employed -0.5 2004 net financial debt at closing +0.3 2004 operating result -0.3 2004 net result Cash No impact Minor impact 19 1st January 2004 Consolidated Balance Sheet: ITGAAP vs IFRS ITGAAP (million euro) Non-current assets Net fixed assets Intangible assets Investments Other non-current assets Net working capital Reserve for employee termination indemnities Net capital employed Shareholders’ equity including minority interest Net borrowings Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity Exchange rate Euro/US$ as at 31st december Equity accounted Saipem J.V Other IFRS Restatements 36.360 3.610 3.160 (35) 43.095 (679) (1.696) (847) 600 186 (1.757) 1.079 (191) (555) Overall Restatements IFRS 198 9 16 163 3.241 (6) (36) (33) 3.166 (93) 1.354 (853) 762 162 1.425 1.149 37.714 2.757 3.922 127 44.520 470 31 2 26 59 (496) 41.861 (647) 181 3.099 2.633 44.494 28.318 13.543 (749) 102 181 3.195 (96) 2.446 187 30.764 13.730 41.861 (647) 181 3.099 2.633 44.494 1,263 20 31st December 2004 Consolidated Balance Sheet: ITGAAP vs IFRS ITGAAP (million euro) Non-current assets Net fixed assets Intangible assets Investments Other non-current assets Net working capital Reserve for employee termination indemnities Net capital employed Shareholders’ equity including minority interest Net borrowings Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity Exchange rate Euro/US$ as at 31st december Other IFRS Restatements Equity accounted J.V Saipem Overall Restatements IFRS 189 2 (15) 184 3.239 92 105 5 3.441 (498) 1.343 (711) 912 142 1.686 694 38.959 2.479 4.194 (58) 45.574 90 34 2 31 67 (523) 42.694 (698) 171 2.974 2.447 45.141 32.466 10.228 (843) 145 171 3.058 (84) 2.215 232 34.681 10.460 42.694 (698) 171 2.974 2.447 45.141 37.616 3.190 3.282 (200) 43.888 (604) (1.690) (803) 618 135 (1.740) 1.008 (206) (590) 1,362 21 2004 Income Statement: ITGAAP vs IFRS Reclass. of Saipem J.V extraordina reclassifica Reclassifica reported ry items tion tion IT GAAP Exploration & Production Gas & Power Refining & Marketing Petrochemical Corporate & Others Operating income Net financial income (expense) Net income (expense) from investments Net extraordinary income (expense) Income before income taxes Income taxes Income before minority interest Minority interest Net income 8.017 3.463 965 271 (253) (50) (32) (233) 17 (318) (293) 12.463 (616) (95) 229 (56) 608 56 12.541 (4.653) 7.888 (614) 7.274 48 (48) 0 0 (34) Pro IFRS Forma Adjustments IFRS (17) 7.933 3.431 732 288 (881) 162 (3) 348 32 57 8.095 3.428 1.080 320 (824) (293) (51) 11.503 596 12.099 42 71 (5) 26 (58) 934 0 (24) (80) (82) 854 0 (180) 66 (114) 114 0 (30) 30 0 12.379 (4.605) 7.774 (500) 7.274 492 (859) (367) 154 (213) 12.871 (5.464) 7.407 (346) 7.061 0 22 Adjusted Results Billion € Adjusted operating and net income defined as: • Excluding special items • Excluding weighted average cost valuation on inventory Special items details provided to financial analiysts (by business and nature) 2004 adjusted operating income 12.1 IT GAAP RECLASS. 12.5 IFRS 2004 adjusted net income 6.7 IT GAAP RECLASS. 6.8 Commento importante per gestire il consensus del 1Q05 e preparare il mercato al diverso modo di rappresentare i risultati IFRS 23 Debt and Gearing: ITGAAP vs IFRS Bn € IFRS ITALIAN GAAP Debt to equity ratio 13.5 13.7 10.2 0.48 10.5 0.45 0.31 1st January 2004 31st December 2004 1st January 2004 0.30 31st December 2004 24 IFRS - 2005 onwards No impact on cash generation Tax rate guideline unchanged Higher volatility on inventory valuation according to market scenario Wider use of fair value in place of historical cost More details on IFRS first application and 1Q 2004 on our website at the following internet page: www.eni.it/investor 25 Risultati 1° trimestre 2005 a criteri IFRS Gestione Consensus: • rischio informativa asimmetrica • nuova nozione di risultato “adjusted” • alta volatilità soprattutto nel business R&M • agevolazione confronto con risultati 1Q04 a principi IFRS 26 Gestione del Consensus: nuova rappresentazione dei risultati economici Utile operativo reported ITGAAP 1Q05 - IFRS P 4.387 Profit (loss) on stock 194 Utile operativo a valori correnti 4.193 Special Items P (92) Utile operativo adjusted P 4.285 Utile netto reported P Profit (loss) on stock Presentazione Dati di dettaglio 1Q04 disponibili in formato excel 2.445 122 Utile netto a valori correnti Maggiore articolazione nella modalità di rappresentazione dei risultati 2.323 Special Items P (62) Utile netto adjusted P 2.385 Press release e tabelle per analisti 27 R&M – Operating Income Million € Adjusted* Reported Maggiore volatilità del risultato: 269 +115.2% Oltre il 50% del risultato operativo del 1Q05 è +55.1% 125 152 ascrivibile agli inventory gains 98 Brent $/boe 1Q 2004 1Q 2005 1Q 2004 1Q 2005 Special items & Inventory valuation 1Q04 Inventory gains 25 Redundancy incentives (5) Others 7 1Q05 €/boe 50 50 45 45 40 40 35 35 30 30 25 25 Inventory gains 143 Redundancy incentives (4) $/boe +48.7 Others 3 €/boe +41.7 Provisions for environmental laws and decommissioning (25) * Excluding special items and gains (losses) on inventory 1Q04 2Q04 1Q05/1Q04 3Q04 4Q04 1Q05 Δ% 28 Principali impatti adozione IFRS su attività IR Maggiore volatilità del risultato Rappresentazione dei risultati più articolata Maggiore complessità nella gestione del consensus Agevola il confronto con i peers: • Indicatori di performance industriali • Indicatori economici 29 L’esperienza degli IR Officer Jadran Trevisan IR manager 14 Giugno 2005, Milano