ROLE PLAYNG
INTERROGATORIO
Marco Cannavicci
Tipologia delle fonti
-
-
-
“cooperative and friendly” – scarsa resistenza,
risponde liberamente; l’interrogante rischia di
allentare il controllo;
“neutral and nonpartisan” – bassa collaborazione,
si limita a rispondere alle domande; l’interrogante
deve insistere sugli obiettivi informativi;
“hostile and antagonistic” - rifiuta di rispondere e
sfida l’interrogante che deve avere self-control,
pazienza e tatto (timely)
“the successful interrogator is a skilled
professional who is able to rapidly evaluate
sources of information and adapt his
approach and techniques accordingly”
2. Personal qualities
-
“motivation”
“alertness”
“patience and tact”
“credibility”
“objectivity”
“self-control”
“adaptability”
“perseverance”
“appearence and demeanor”
“initiative”
“The interrogator has a position
of authority over the source.
The source realizes this fact,
in some cases, believes his future
might depend upon his association
with the interrogator.”
Assessing sources
COOPERATION LEVEL
Responds to direct question
Responds hesitantly
Does not respond
KNOWLEDGEABILITY LEVEL
To possess pertinent information
Might have pertinent information
Does not appear to have pertinent info
CODE
1
2
3
CODE
A
B
C
a. Planning and preparation
In base alle valutazioni di “collection and
screening”:
- stabilire gli obiettivi informativi
- preparare la sequenza delle domande
- ipotizzare il tipo di approccio
- indicare opportune modalità di gestione
logistica della fonte alle guardie (alloggio,
cibo, vestiario, …)
b. Approach phase
-
Rapport postures
-
-
stern posture
sympathetic posture
Developing rapport
-
-
smooth transitions
sincere and convincing
recognize the breaking point
Interrogator
-
-
-
Establish and mantain CONTROL over the
source and interrogation
Establish and mantain RAPPORT between
the interrogator and source
MANIPULATE the source’s emotions and
weaknesses to gain his willing cooperation
Under no circumstances will the interrogator
betray surprise at anything the EPW might
say. Many EPWs will talk freely if they feel
the information they are discussing is
already known to the interrogator. If the
interrogator acts surprised, the EPW may
stop talking immediately.
Approach combinations:
- Direct
- Incentive
- Emotional
- love
- hate
- Increased fear-up
- fear-down
- Pride and ego
- ego-up
- ego-down
Approach
-
-
Futility
We know all
File and dossier
Establish your identity
Repetition
Rapid fire
Silent
Change of scene
c. Questioning phase
-
Direct questions
Follow-up questions
-
-
-
Hot
Cold
Nonpertinent questions
Repeated questions
Control questions
Prepared questions
Questions to avoid
-
Leading questions
Negative questions
Compound questions
Vague questions
Questioning sequence
-
-
Map tracking
Establish a route
Segment and exploit the route
Exploit dispositions not on route
Recording information
Taking notes
-
Using his own notes
Using a sound or video recorder
d. Termination phase
-
Reasons for termination
-
-
-
-
La fonte permane non cooperativa
La fonte è ferita o ammalata
Sono richiesti più periodi di interrogatorio
La fonte cambia atteggiamento e l’interrogatore
perde il controllo
Gli obiettivi informativi sono stati soddisfatti
Termination procedures
e. Reporting information
-
-
compilazione della modulistica allestita per
l’inoltro delle informazioni
tempestivo inoltro delle informazioni alle
sezioni di analisi strategica, operativa o
tattica
Interrogare con un interprete
-
-
sono richiesti tempi maggiori
l’interprete va “preparato”
vengono mantenute le 5 fasi del processo
informativo
l’interprete ripete anche le modalità di
approccio (pause, tono voce, postura, …)
dopo l’interrogatorio, deve essere valutato
anche l’interprete
-
Interpretation methods
-
Simultaneous
Alternate
-
Interpreter briefing
-
Conduct the interrogation
GRAZIE
PER LA VOSTRA
ATTENZIONE
Marco Cannavicci
[email protected]