UNIONE EUROPEA
POR ERDF Sardinia 2007-2013
Pilot test indicators
Unit regional evaluation
Regional Working group
Lodovico Conzimu
Sonia Pistis
Eloisa Canu
Manuela Murru
(Evaluation Unit)
(Evaluation Unit)
(Evaluation Unit)
(Managing Authority)
Brussels, October 21, 2011
REPUBBLICA
ITALIANA
REGIONE AUTONOMA
DELLA SARDEGNA
Breakdown of finances by
Priority Axis
The overall objective
is
To increase the
competitiveness of the
productive system
and the attractiveness
of regional integration
through the diffusion
of innovation,
promoting the
potential of local
identity and traditions
and preserving natural
resources
Brussels, October 21, 2011
Priority Axis
Total Public
Contribution
1- Information Society
170.167.941
2 - Inclusion, Social Services,
Education and Lawfulness
161.659.544
3 – Energy
187.184.735
4 – Environment, Attractiveness
of Natural and Cultural
Resources, Tourism
382.877.868
5 – Urban Development
306.302.295
6 – Competitiveness
459.453.442
7 – Technical Assistance
34.033.588
EU Contribution
680.671.765
National Public Contribution
1.021.007.648
Total
1.701.679.413
Pilot test indicators
Axis on the total weight
10,00%
9,50%
11,00%
22,50%
18,00%
27,00%
2,00%
2
Priority 2: present situation
Indicators
List of corresponding indicators (where applicable)
Specific Objectives
Priority axis
2.1
Outputs
and accessibility of
security for citizens and
Allocation
very or fairly uncomfortable with the risk of
Pilot projects
business
crime in their area of total households)
(%)(N.)
service delivery to
Percentage of seniors receiving home care
those at risk of social
Interventions
exclusion, integration
Integrated (ADI) in the total elderly
population (65 years and over)
between the institutions
2.2 Improve the quality in
and the local population
the structure and services
Percentage of municipalities that have
and strengthen the
serving
enabled services for children (nursery
instrumental equipment
including education, with Involved students schools or other innovative services and
and infrastructure for
particular attention
on
learning in a perspective equal opportunity
of in social, cultural and non-discrimination
and
economic non-
Impacts*
Perceived risk of crime (Families who feel
Guaratee
increased/better level of
Improving the quality
Results
…
discrimination
the
population,
supplementary) of the total municipalities in
the Region
Percentage of facilities dedicated to
Involved local
public institutions
educational and social value of the total
schools surveyed in Region
Breve informativa sul PO FESR e sul sistema di monitoraggio
Brussels, October 21, 2011
Pilot test indicators
3
New framework Priority 2:
accessibility of health and social care system
What do you want to
change? (results)
Indicators
Result indicator
Name_.1.1: waiting lists
Definition_1.1: Reduction of time
(days) for the waiting lists for services
performed with a high-tech equipment
Source_1.1: Regional plan of
government waiting lists
Baseline_1.1:138
Output indicators
Name_1.1: high-tech equipment
Definition_1.1: Number of high-tech equipment purchased
Source_1.1: Assessorato dell'igiene e sanità e dell'assistenza
sociale (Regional Department of hygiene and health and social
care)
Target_1.1: to be defined
Allocation
Name_1.2: Percentage of elderly
people receiving integrated home care
(ADI) in the total elderly population (65
years and over)
Source_1.2: DPS-Istat
Baseline_1.2: 2,3
Enhancing the accessibility of
facilities and services to the
population within the health
system
Name_1.3: Distance Health
infrastructure
Definition 1.3 : Average travel time to
hospital services
Source_1.3: survey
Baseline_1.3: to be defined
Name_1.2: Interventions made
68.067.000
Definition_1.2: Number of houses of health built (case della
salute)
Source_1.2: Assessorato dell'igiene e sanità e dell'assistenza
sociale (Regional Department of hygiene and health and social
care)
Target_1.2.: 11
Name_1.4: Coverage rate – Disabled
Definition_1.4: Percentage of disabled
recipients of interventions in the total
population with severe disabilities (art.
3 co.3 L.104/99)
informativa
sul PO FESR e sul sistema di monitoraggio
Source_1.4:Breve
Assessorato
alla SanitàDirezione Politiche Sociali (beneficiari
L.162/98) Sardegna
Baseline _1.4: 0
4
Brussels, October 21, 2011
Pilot test indicators
New framework Priority 2:
Increasing attractiveness of education system and the skills
of students
What do you want to
change? (results)
Increasing
attractiveness
education system
Indicators
Result indicator
Name_2.1: Drop out rate
Output indicators
Name 2.1.: Interventions of technological modernization
Definition_2.1: Percentage of
students who leave school in two
years of “superior school” (age 1416).
Definition_2.1: nr of Interventions of technological modernization
in the schools
Source_2.1: Ministry of Education ,
University and Research.
Allocation
Source_2.1: Assessorato della pubblica istruzione, beni culturali,
informazione, spettacolo e sport (Regional Department of
Education, cultural, information, entertainment and sports)
Target_2.1: to be defined
of Baseline_2.1: to be defined
Name_2.2: Rate of diffusione of intervetions on school buildings
Definition_2.2: Share of school buildings equipped with space and
materials for extracurricular activities
Source_2.2: Assessorato della pubblica istruzione, beni culturali,
informazione, spettacolo e sport (Regional Department of
Education, cultural, information, entertainment and sports)
92.085.000
Target_2.2: 13
Name_2.2 : Mathematical skills of
students
Definition_2.2: Percentage of 15year-olds, with up to the first level of
Increasing the skills of competence in mathematics
students
Source_2.2: DPS-Istat
Name_2.3: Involved students
Definition_2.3: Nr. of potentially students involved actually using
the new equipment
Source_2.3: Assessorato della pubblica istruzione, beni culturali,
informazione, spettacolo e sport (Regional Department of
Education, cultural, information, entertainment and sports)
Target_2.3: to be defined
Breve informativa sul PO FESR e sul sistema di monitoraggio
Baseline_2.2: 45.3
Target_2.2: 21
5
Brussels, October 21, 2011
Pilot test indicators
New framework Priority 4:
Increase attractiveness of tourism
Pilot test
POR 2007-2013
Indicators
Specific
Result indicators
Objectives
Output indicators
 Number
interventions
 Number
4.2
Develop
the
tourism offer in a
sustainable manner
based
on
the
tickets
of
sold
per
100
inhabitants
attractiveness of the
naturalistic,
landscapes
and
cultural assets
want to change?
 number
visitors
cultural venues
of
for
Result indicators
of
 Number of tourist
accomodation
restructured
and
improved
 Number of tourist
accomodation
located
in
the
Ecogical
regional
network
 Number of tourist
companies
certificated
(ecolabel,
EMAS,
ISO 14001)
 Number
Integrated
itineraries
Output indicators
 number of events
(
conventions and initiative deseasoning or other type of
events) funded by Region that
comprise at least one night stay
in the low season
for
theatre, concerts
Indicators
What do you
Changement:
improve the
tourism
demand in the
low season
 number of de seasoned
 number of presences in
initiatives funded by bonus
low season by contries and
addressed to non resident
regions of origin
people
number of visitors in
museums and archeological
 Number of tourist facilities
areas in low season
funded
N° of residents that stay at
least one night in low season
of
tourist
Breve informativa sul PO FESR e sul sistema di monitoraggio
6
Brussels, October 21, 2011
Pilot test indicators
New framework Priority 5:
Urban development
Pilot test
POR 2007-2013
Specific Objectives
Results
What do you want to
change? (results)
Outputs
5.1 Promoting
Usage of public
integrated re-
transport (percentage
qualification of urban
of workers and
areas, improving their
students using public
environmental, social
transit on total of
and economic
commuters)(%)
No. of transfer
facilities
No. of projects
conditions and
concerning
strengthening their
intermodal
connections with the
Assisted living for
development of
disadvantaged areas
contrasting decline
and enhancing
historical, artistic and
productive heritage
Output
indicators
Percentage of workers Nr. of transfer
and students using
facilities
public transport on total
of commuters
Fostering urban quality Source_1.1: DPS-Istat
and urban services
(above
all,
public
transport)
Nr. of projects
concerning
intermodal
transportation
Growth of microenterprises in
Enhancing
municipalities
attractiveness of small interested by the OP’s
towns
and
their projects
capacity to retain/attract
population by acting on Source_2.1: Chamber
infrastructures, services of commerce
and enterprises
Nr of
interventions
transportation
surrounding areas
5.2 Promoting
Result indicator
No. of
elderly people:
Percentage of elderly
interventions
people receiving
integrated home care
actions
No. of sustain
(ADI) in the total
elderly population (65
years and over)
Nr. of sustain
actions
Breve informativa sul PO FESR e sul sistema di monitoraggio
7
Brussels, October 21, 2011
Pilot test indicators
Conclusions
Strengths
Weaknesses
 Clear definition of the link (causality)
between objectives, activities and
outcomes.

 Planning aimed at measurable
outcomes.
Difficulty in identifying other factors.
 Cost to carry out evaluations of the
other factors

Definition of targets
 Difficulty in measuring the change
using only one indicator.
Opportunities
Risks
 Enhance monitoring activities.
 Overemphasis on indicators rather
than overall objective
 Coordination between regional
statistics offices, management
authorities and other areas of the
administration.
Brussels, October 21, 2011
Pilot test indicators
8