The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Ciro SANTUS [email protected] Notch effect Size effect Summary D.I.M.N.P. Facoltà di Ingegneria. Università di Pisa. July 2007 The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Introduction Short/Long cracks Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Non-propagating cracks Size effect Summary Notch effect Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Introduction Short/Long cracks Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Non-propagating cracks Size effect Summary Notch effect Size effect Summary Only one and simple formula The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle The material critical distance is: 1 ∆Kth 2 a0 = π ∆σ0 Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect where: Size effect Summary I ∆Kth is the (long crack) threshold stress intensity factor, at a certain load ratio R I ∆σ0 is the fatigue limit, at the same load ratio R Only one and simple formula The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle The material critical distance is: 1 ∆Kth 2 a0 = π ∆σ0 Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect how to remember this formula: Size effect Summary I π is there just for cosmetics I to have a length, ∆Kth and ∆σ0 need to be put in ratio and squared Only one and simple formula The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle The material critical distance is: 1 ∆Kth 2 a0 = π ∆σ0 Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Why is this formula so important? Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short/Long cracks Δσ = Δσ 0 Δσ = 1 Unnotched (plain) specimen 1 ⎛ ΔK th a0 = ⎜⎜ π ⎝ Δσ 0 ⎞ ⎟⎟ ⎠ 2 Non-propagating cracks ΔK th πa Notch effect Size effect Summary 2 a (log) 2a Long crack It is the link from the less severe notch (plain specimen) to the most severe notch (long crack) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short/Long cracks Δσ = Δσ 0 1 ⎛ ΔK th a0 = ⎜⎜ π ⎝ Δσ 0 Non-propagating cracks ⎞ ⎟⎟ ⎠ 2 ΔK th Δσ = πa a (log) Short crack, anomalous behavior Long crack, fracture mechanics Transition from the short cracks to long cracks regimes Notch effect Size effect Summary The El Haddad model The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle To describe the short to long crack transition the intrinsic crack model is used p ∆Kth = ∆σ π(a + a0 ) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect M. H. El Haddad, T. H. Topper, K. N. Smith Prediction of non propagating cracks Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 11, p. 573–584 (1979) Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue The El Haddad model subtitle To describe the short to long crack transition the intrinsic crack model is used p ∆Kth = ∆σ π(a + a0 ) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Δσ (log) Summary Δσ = Δσ 0 Δσ = ΔK th π (a + a0 ) Δσ = ΔK th πa a (log) The El Haddad model The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle To describe the short to long crack transition the intrinsic crack model is used p ∆Kth = ∆σ π(a + a0 ) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary At least it works for asymptotes: I I ∆σ (a/a0 → 0) = ∆σ0 √ ∆σ (a/a0 → ∞) = ∆Kth / πa Results of the Theory of Critical Distances The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Short crack / Long crack Short/Long cracks Theory of Critical Distance Non-propagating cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Notch effect Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Introduction Short/Long cracks Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Non-propagating cracks Size effect Summary Notch effect Size effect Summary Linking Fatigue to Fracture Mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle I Fatigue is a main crack leading to final fracture Introduction I According to LEFM a short crack should not grow Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Δσ Size effect Summary ai So why fatigue ? Assuming an existing crack ai (~ grain size) it follows: ΔK = βσ πai ΔK th Linking Fatigue to Fracture Mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle The LEFM does not work while the crack is short Introduction Short/Long cracks da/dn (log) Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Short crack behavior ΔK th Long crack behavior ΔK (log) The short crack threshold is not the same as long crack Summary Linking Fatigue to Fracture Mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle El–Haddad models the short crack threshold, but does not explain why Δσ (log) Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks ΔK th Δσ th = πa Short crack, anomalous behavior Δσ th, EH = Introduction Notch effect Size effect Summary ΔK th π(a +a0 ) a (log) Linking Fatigue to Fracture Mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Short crack classification: Introduction I Mechanically short crack Short/Long cracks I Microstructurally short crack Non-propagating cracks I Physically short crack Notch effect Size effect Summary S. Suresh Fatigue of Materials Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition (2006) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Mechanically short crack subtitle The crack is inside the cyclic notch plastic region Introduction Short/Long cracks Notch (cyclic) plastic zone Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Mechanically short crack I Small scale yielding assumption violated (assumed for definition of K) I Crack size can be few millimeters Microstructurally short crack The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle The crack is confined in few grains Grain Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Microstructural short crack I I I I Continuum mechanics not valid (grain anisotropy, neighbor grains constraints) Dislocation mechanisms Shear growth Weakest path Crack closure The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle The (plain strain) long crack closure is explained as plastic wedge Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary R. Pippan, F. Riemelmoser Visualization of plasticity–induced crack closure under plane strain conditions Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 60, p. 315–322 (1998) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Crack closure subtitle The threshold stress intensity factor can be split into two components: I I Introduction Short/Long cracks intrinsic ∆Kth,i : the crack remains close for a portion of the cycle Non-propagating cracks extrinsic ∆Kth,e = ∆Kth,eff : the crack has its own resistance against propagation Size effect K ΔKth= ΔKth, i + ΔKth, e ΔKth, i = ΔKth, eff ΔKth, e = Kop Notch effect Summary Crack closure The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Further effects than closure, in extrinsic threshold Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary A.J. Mc, R.O. Ritchie Crack closure and the fatigue–crack propagation threshold as a function of load ratio Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 21, p. 847–855 (1998) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Physically short cracks subtitle Introduction Long crack > 1 mm K Kop Kcl ΔKeff Physically short crack < 1mm K time Partial closure Kcl ~ Kop > 0 then ΔKeff reduces Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect ΔKeff Kcl Kop Kop time No closure Kcl ~ Kop = 0 or even < 0 !!! I Crack size ≤ 1 mm, much longer than grain size I Crack closure is not saturated yet Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Introduction Short/Long cracks Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Non-propagating cracks Size effect Summary Notch effect Size effect Summary Non–propagating cracks in notched components The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Δσ Δσ 0 Δσ = kt ρ Short/Long cracks Δσ = 1 ΔK th πD β Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary D D = cost.; ρ → 0; kt → ∞ 1 kt* non-prop. cracks kt R. A. Smith, K. J. Miller Prediction of Fatigue Regimes in Notched Components International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 20, p. 201–206 (1978) Non–propagating cracks in notched components The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Δσ Short/Long cracks Δσ = Δσ 0 kt Non-propagating cracks Δσ = 1 ΔK th β πD Notch effect Size effect Summary 1 kt* non-prop. cracks kt The non–propagating crack can be observed only for crack–like notches Non–propagating cracks in notched components The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Δσ Δσ 0 Δσ = kt Short/Long cracks 1 ΔK th Δσ = β πD Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary 1 kt* non-prop. cracks kt The non–propagating crack stress concentration factor kt∗ is related to the material critical distance: r r D D ∗ kt = β = a0 aD Non–propagating cracks in notched components The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Short/Long cracks ρ Notch: a0 2a Non-propagating cracks Notch effect kt ≈1 + 2 a ρ Crack: β =1 The crack tip critical radius ρ ∗ can be obtained for the reference crack configuration: r r a a ∗ kt = 1+2 = → ρ ∗ = 4a0 ∗ ρ a0 Size effect Summary Non–propagating cracks in notched components The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Short/Long cracks ρ Notch: a0 2a Notch effect kt ≈1 + 2 Crack: β =1 Notch behavior (no non–propagating crack) ρ > ρ ∗ = 4a0 Non-propagating cracks a ρ Size effect Summary Non–propagating cracks in notched components The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Short/Long cracks ρ Notch: a0 2a Crack behavior (non–propagating crack) ρ < ρ ∗ = 4a0 Non-propagating cracks Notch effect kt ≈1 + 2 Crack: β =1 a ρ Size effect Summary Non–propagating cracks, fracture mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle In static fracture mechanics the resistance curve is common σ3 πσ i a1 E 2 G= a1 Short/Long cracks σ4 G, R σ2 Introduction Non-propagating cracks Static fracture resistance curve R Size effect Summary σ1 Δa′ Δa′′ Notch effect a Increasing the stress σ : I at σ1 the crack a1 does not increase I at σ2 the crack a1 increases up to a1 + ∆a0 I at σ3 critical stable growth point is reached I at σ4 unstable growth is obtained Non–propagating cracks, fracture mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Small–Long crack resistance curve Introduction Short/Long cracks ΔK (log) ′ a = ΔK th ΔK th, Non-prop. crack a a0 Non-propagating cracks ′′ a = ΔK th ΔK th, Notch effect Size effect El Haddad resistance curve ΔK th,a = ΔK th a a + a0 a (log) D. Taylor A mechanistic approach to critical–distance methods in notch fatigue Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 24, p. 215–224 (2001) Summary Non–propagating cracks, fracture mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction ΔK (log) Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect (C) (B) (A) ΔK th,a = ΔK th Size effect a a + a0 Summary a (log) I (A) Non–propagating notch crack I (B) Fatigue limit non–propagating notch crack I (C) Propagating crack leading to failure Non–propagating cracks, fracture mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction ΔK (log) Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Crack-like notch, loaded at Δσn (B) Notch effect ΔK th,a = ΔK th a a + a0 Size effect Summary a (log) Non − prop. crack size ≈ 2 a0 I Non–propagating fatigue crack size ≈ 2a0 , emanating at a crack–like notch I It allows the mechanistic approach to local methods to asses notch fatigue strength Non–propagating cracks, fracture mechanics The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction ΔK (log) Crack-like notch Short/Long cracks ΔK th,a = ΔK th a a + a0 Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Resistance curve Size effect Summary Blunt notch a (log) I Crack–like notch, slope lower than resistance curve, then non–propagating crack I Blunt notch, same initial slope than resistance curve, no non–propagating crack Nucleation mechanism The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Stage I Stage II Stage I Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Stage I Nucleation is: I Persistent Slip Bands (PSB) formation I Intrusion/Estrusion at the surface I Stage I shear dominated growth (crystallographic propagation) I Stage II tensile dominated growth (non–crystallographic propagation) Summary Non–propagating crack in plain specimen The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle At the fatigue limit non–propagating fatigue cracks (microstructurally short) can be detected in steels Δσ Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Plain specimen Important role of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions, at the surface initiation point Summary Fatigue limit as non–propagating crack condition The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle At the fatigue limit non–propagating fatigue cracks (crystallographic size) can be detected in non ferrous alloys Δσ Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Plain specimen More precisely very slow propagation instead of non-propagating, in almost all non ferrous alloys (no clear fatigue limit) Summary Fatigue limit as non–propagating crack condition The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle At the fatigue limit non–propagating fatigue cracks are confined within a few number of grains Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Y. Murakami Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions Elsevier (2003) Size effect Summary Microstructurally vs. Physically The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle I I Plain specimen fatigue limit is microstructurally short crack resistance Crack–like notch fatigue limit is physically short crack resistance Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary K. J. Miller The two thresholds of fatigue behaviour Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 16, p. 931–939 (1993) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Microstructurally vs. Physically subtitle I I Plain specimen fatigue limit is microstructurally short crack resistance Crack–like notch fatigue limit is physically short crack resistance Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Δσ (log) Notched sp. Plain sp. Summary Δσ = Δσ 0 Δσ = Major barrier Microstructurally short crack d ΔK th πa a (log) Physically Long crack short crack Microstructurally vs. Physically The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle I I Plain specimen fatigue limit is microstructurally short crack resistance Crack–like notch fatigue limit is physically short crack resistance Metallurgical evidence: Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary I The smaller the grain size, the higher the plain specimen fatigue limit I The larger the grain size, the higher the threshold stress intensity factor The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Microstructurally vs. Physically subtitle Metallurgical evidence: I The smaller the grain size, the higher the plain specimen fatigue limit I The larger the grain size, the higher the threshold stress intensity factor Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Δσ (log) Crack-like notched sp. Plain sp. d1 d2 a (log) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Introduction Short/Long cracks Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Non-propagating cracks Size effect Summary Notch effect Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Classic approaches for kf subtitle Introduction σ (log) Short/Long cracks Plain specimen Non-propagating cracks Δσ0 Notched specimen 100 103 LCF Δσn (net area) 106 HCF Nf (log) Notch effect is defined by the fatigue factor kf , at the fatigue limit: kf = ∆σ0 ∆σn Notch effect Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Classic approaches for kf subtitle Introduction σ (log) Short/Long cracks Plain specimen Non-propagating cracks Δσ0 Notched specimen 100 103 LCF Δσn (net area) 106 HCF Notch sensitivity is usually defined as: q= kf − 1 , kt − 1 q = [0, 1] I q = 0 → kf = 1, no notch sensitivity I q = 1 → kf = kt , full notch sensitivity Nf (log) Notch effect Size effect Summary Classic approaches for kf The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Peterson equation for kf : Introduction Short/Long cracks kf = 1 + q(kt − 1), 1 q= αP 1+ r Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect R. E. Peterson Notch sensitivity In: Metal Fatigue, Edited by G. Sines and J. L. Waisman, McGraw–Hill, New York p. 293–306 (1959) Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Classic approaches for kf subtitle Neuber equation for kf : Introduction Short/Long cracks kf = 1 + q(kt − 1), 1 r q= 1+ αN r Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary H. Neuber Theory of Notch Stresses Springer, Berlin (1955) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Classic approaches for kf subtitle Stress gradient as phenomenological parameter: 1 dσ χ= σmax dx x=0 Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect χ= 1 ⎛ dσ ( x ) ⎞ ⎜ ⎟ σ max ⎝ dx ⎠ x =0 σ (x) x E. Siebel, M. Stieler Dissimilar stress distributions and cyclic loading Z Ver Deutsch Ing, vol. 97, p. 121–131 (1955) Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Classic approaches for kf subtitle Stress gradient as phenomenological parameter: 1 dσ χ= σmax dx x=0 Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect kt / kf kt / kf Summary Mechanistic approaches to kf The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle First fracture mechanics notch sensitivity model Introduction Short/Long cracks kt kf = r a0 1 + 4.5 r M. Klesnil, P. Lukáš Fatigue of Metallic Materials Elsevier Science, Amsterdam (1980) Fracture mechanics related length parameter, instead of Peterson and Neuber semi–empirical ones Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Mechanistic approaches to kf subtitle First fracture mechanics related notch sensitivity model. Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks kt kf = r a0 1 + 4.5 r Δσ 0 Δσ n kt kf = Δ σn Δσ0 as uniform Δσ n r a0 Fatigue limit: ΔK = ΔKth Notch effect Size effect Summary I elliptical surface notch I non–propagating crack a0 I fatigue limit as long crack threshold at the crack tip Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Critical distance approaches to notch sensitivity are: Introduction I Point method Short/Long cracks I Line method Non-propagating cracks I Area method Notch effect Size effect Summary D. Taylor Geometrical effects in fatigue: a unifying theoretical model International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 21, p. 413–420 (1999) Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Point method (PM) Introduction Short/Long cracks Δσ th Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Δσ (r ) = β Δσ th ΔK th a = 2r 2π r Δσ (a0 / 2) = Δσ 0 a0 / 2 r At the fatigue limit (for a crack) the stress amplitude at a0 /2 is σ0 (plain specimen fatigue limit) Size effect Summary Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Line method (LM) Introduction Short/Long cracks Δσ th Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Δσ (r ) = β Δσ th ΔK th a = 2r 2π r Δσ av (2a0 ) = 2a0 1 2a0 Size effect Summary 2 a0 ∫ Δσ (r ) dr = Δσ 0 r At the fatigue limit (for a crack) the average stress amplitude over r = [0, a0 /2] is σ0 0 Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Area method (AM) Introduction Short/Long cracks Δσ th Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Δσ (r ) = β Δσ th ΔK th a = 2r 2π r Size effect Summary a0 r Δσ av (Area, r = a0 ) = 4 π a0 2 π / 2 a0 ∫ ∫ Δσ (r ,θ ) r dr dθ ≈ 1.1Δσ 0 0 0 At the fatigue limit (for a crack) the average stress amplitude over r = [0, a0 /2], θ = [−π/2, π/2] is σ0 Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Δσ th Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Finite peak stress (notch) Notch effect Size effect Summary Δσ (a0 / 2) = Δσ 0 a0 / 2 At the fatigue limit either cracks or notches feature similar local stress distributions Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle I Point method, most commonly used Introduction I Line method, physical interpretation (explained later) Short/Long cracks I Area method, rarely used Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Advantages with respect to the use kf : Introduction I Nominal stress not required Short/Long cracks I Any geometry, notch depth and opening angle Non-propagating cracks I Defined even for zero notch radius Notch effect Size effect Summary Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Examples Introduction Short/Long cracks Zero radius notch Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Nominalstress = ?? kf = ?? k t = ∞, q = 0 kf = ?? Δσ(PM) a0/2 a0/2 Fatigue limit: Δσ(PM) = Δσ0 Fatigue limit: Δσ(PM) = Δσ0 Δσ(PM) Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Validation of the critical distance methods: Introduction Short/Long cracks D. Taylor, G. Wang The validation of some methods of notch fatigue analysis Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 23, p. 387–394 (2000) Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Requirements for the use of critical distance methods: I ∆σ0 , a0 , ∆Kth (just two of them) I structure elastic F.E. post processing Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Requirements for the use of critical distance methods: I ∆σ0 is usually available in technical literature I ∆Kth sometimes not available (especially at R < 0) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Theory of Critical Distances for notch sensitivity The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle a0 can be deduced from fatigue limit with notched geometry Introduction Short/Long cracks Δσ0 Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Δσ0 PM at a0/2 Plain specimen at fatigue limit Notched geometry at fatigue limit Size effect Summary Mechanistic explanation for the Line Method The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Resistance curve approach offers a mechanistic approach to explain Line Method Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks D. Taylor A mechanistic approach to critical distance methods in notch fatigue Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 24, p. 215–224 (2001) Notch effect Size effect Summary Mechanistic explanation for the Line Method The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Notch behavior regimes Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary Mechanistic explanation for the Line Method The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Crack–like notch Introduction Short/Long cracks Stress distribution (without the crack) Δσ (r ) Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary 2 a0 r Mechanistic explanation for the Line Method The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Crack–like notch Introduction ΔK Non-prop. crack (fatigue limit) Short/Long cracks Resistance curve Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary 2 a0 r Mechanistic explanation for the Line Method The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Average stress (before crack) to calculate ∆K(2a0 ) Introduction Short/Long cracks 1 ∆σav = 2a0 Z 2a0 0 Notch effect Z 2a0 ∆K(2a0 ) = Non-propagating cracks ∆σ (r)dr 0 h(r, a0 )σ (r)dr = ∆σav p Size effect 2a0 π A (h(r, a): weight function, A: correction factor) Summary Mechanistic explanation for the Line Method The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle By imposing resistance curve tangency: Introduction Short/Long cracks ∆K(2a0 ) = ∆Kth,2a0 it follows: Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect ∆σav ≈ σ0 Line Method explained for Crack–like notch Summary Generalization of Line Method, crack–like notch The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Line Method also works for I short cracks: ∆σn = ∆σ0 I blunt notches: ∆σn = ∆σ0 kt Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Then it can be used for any notch geometry Size effect Summary Generalization of Line Method, crack–like notch The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Point Method is an approximation of the Line Method Introduction I Valid for any kind of notch (radius, depth, angle) Short/Long cracks I Simple to use along with Finite Element Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Exercise on TCD methods subtitle Find fatigue limit for notched components shown below. Axial load. R = −1. Material AA 7075–T6. Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Δσ n Δσ g Notch effect Size effect 0.5 1 Summary α = 60° 10 12 1 0.1 2.5 (a) Symm. (b) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Exercise on TCD methods subtitle d a /dN[ m/cycle ], (log) Introduction Material properties Fatigue life, R=−1 Short/Long cracks 350 σ0 = 300 150 −190 250 MPa 200 150 100 S−N curve Boller, Seeger 1987 50 0 4 10 10 Non-propagating cracks −6 d a /dN[ m/cycle ], (log) σ [MPa] 400 10 Notch effect −8 10 Size effect MPa m 5 6 10 Nf, N ,(log) (log) f 10 7 10 0 1 Fit Wu 1998 Bu 1986 10 Delta [ MPa m1/2 ], (log) ΔKKI[ MPa m ], (log) 2 3.8 = 32 × 10−6 m = 32 µ 2 × 190 2 4.2 1 = 62 × 10−6 m = 62 µ a0 (max) = π 2 × 150 a0 ≈ 50 µ 1 a0 (min) = π Summary ΔK th = 3.8 − 4.2 −10 10 10 2 The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Exercise on TCD methods subtitle Blunt notch Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks k t = 2.33 200 Notch effect kf = 2.22 Size effect Summary 1 stress [ MPa ] 150 100 50 0 0 S1 stress distribution Point Method, a0 / 2 a0 min / 2 a0 max / 2 0.05 0.1 0.15 depth [ mm ] 0.2 0.25 The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Exercise on TCD methods subtitle Sharp notch Introduction Short/Long cracks 300 stress [ MPa ] 250 200 k t = 8.14 Non-propagating cracks S1 stress distribution Point Method, a0 / 2 a0 min / 2 a0 max / 2 Notch effect Size effect kf (a0 min) = 6.12 kf = 5.51 kf (a0 max) = 5.01 150 100 50 0.1 0 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 depth [ mm ] 0.4 0.5 Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Exercise on TCD methods subtitle Sharp notch, TCD low sensitivity to actual radius Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect Summary MX MX r = 0.1 mm r = 0.01 mm The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Exercise on TCD methods subtitle Sharp notch, low sensibility to local notch radius Introduction Short/Long cracks 800 Peak value insensibility Non-propagating cracks S1 str. distr. r = 0.1 S1 str. distr. r = 0.01 Point Method, a0 / 2 a0 min / 2 a0 max / 2 700 600 500 Notch effect Size effect Summary 400 300 200 100 0 0 0.05 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.15 0.2 The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Exercise on TCD methods subtitle PM ≡ LM, only for sharp notch Introduction Short/Long cracks 800 600 stress [ MPa ] Non-propagating cracks S1 str. distr. r = 0.1 PM r = 0.1 LM r = 0.1 S1 str. distr. r = 0.01 PM r = 0.01 LM r = 0.01 700 500 Notch effect Size effect Summary 400 300 200 100 0 0 0.05 0.01 0.1 0.1 depth [ mm ] 0.15 0.2 The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Introduction Short/Long cracks Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Non-propagating cracks Size effect Summary Notch effect Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Size effect in fatigue subtitle Introduction Δσ Short/Long cracks Δσ Non-propagating cracks Notch effect r ′′ r′ Size effect Summary D′′ D′ r ′′ = r ′ / 2 D′′ = D′ / 2 (1) (2) Continuum mechanics stress distribution is the same The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Size effect in fatigue subtitle Introduction Δσ Short/Long cracks Δσ Non-propagating cracks Notch effect r ′′ r′ Size effect Summary D′′ D′ r ′′ = r ′ / 2 D′′ = D′ / 2 (1) (2) Component (2), the smaller, has higher fatigue strength Material size vs. component dimension The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Large dimension / material size ratio (1) Little dimension / material size ratio (2) Continuum mechanics dimensions scalability violates material scale (meso–scale) proportions Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Δσ Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect r a ξ= r << 1 a All other dimensions much larger ξ = r/a constant, a ∈ [0, ∞], offers the most informative fatigue size effect example Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short crack regime aD Long crack regime aN Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Blunt notch regime Size effect Summary a (log) B. Atzori, P. Lazzarin, G. Meneghetti Fracture mechanics and notch sensitivity Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, vol. 26, p. 257–267 (2003) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short crack regime aD Long crack regime aN Short crack regime, fatigue limit ∆σ = ∆σ0 Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Blunt notch regime Size effect Summary a (log) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short crack regime aD Long crack regime aN Long crack regime, fatigue limit ∆σ = ∆Kth √ β πa Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Blunt notch regime Size effect Summary a (log) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short crack regime aD Long crack regime aN Blunt notch regime, fatigue limit ∆σ = ∆σ0 kt Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Blunt notch regime Size effect Summary a (log) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short crack regime aD Long crack regime Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Blunt notch regime aN Size effect Summary a (log) Asymptotic transition Short–Long crack aD = a0 β2 where a0 = 1/π(∆Kth /∆σ0 )2 (shape factor β correction) The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Δσ (log) Short crack regime aD Long crack regime aN Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Blunt notch regime Size effect Summary a (log) Asymptotic transition Long crack – Blunt notch aN = kt2 aD The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction a0 > a r a Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect a0 Size effect Summary Short crack Crack size smaller than the material critical distance The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction a > a0 , r < a0 r a Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect a0 Long crack Crack size larger than the material critical distance, but crack tip radius smaller than the critical distance Size effect Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Sharp notch size effect subtitle Introduction Short/Long cracks r > a0 Non-propagating cracks r Notch effect Size effect a a0 Blunt notch crack tip radius larger than the material critical distance Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue Introduction Introduction Short/Long cracks Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Non-propagating cracks Size effect Summary Notch effect Size effect Summary Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle D. Taylor The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics Elsevier (2007) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect I The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram introduce the critical distance a0 I a0 is the size of Short/Long crack transition I Anomalous short crack regime is the very basis of fatigue I Critical distance methods (as Point Method PM or Line Method LM) assume a0 as length for averaging stress distribution I Critical distance methods capture notch effect and size effect Summary Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle D. Taylor The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics Elsevier (2007) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect I The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram introduce the critical distance a0 I a0 is the size of Short/Long crack transition I Anomalous short crack regime is the very basis of fatigue I Critical distance methods (as Point Method PM or Line Method LM) assume a0 as length for averaging stress distribution I Critical distance methods capture notch effect and size effect Summary Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle D. Taylor The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics Elsevier (2007) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect I The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram introduce the critical distance a0 I a0 is the size of Short/Long crack transition I Anomalous short crack regime is the very basis of fatigue I Critical distance methods (as Point Method PM or Line Method LM) assume a0 as length for averaging stress distribution I Critical distance methods capture notch effect and size effect Summary Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle D. Taylor The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics Elsevier (2007) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect I The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram introduce the critical distance a0 I a0 is the size of Short/Long crack transition I Anomalous short crack regime is the very basis of fatigue I Critical distance methods (as Point Method PM or Line Method LM) assume a0 as length for averaging stress distribution I Critical distance methods capture notch effect and size effect Summary Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle D. Taylor The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics Elsevier (2007) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect I The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram introduce the critical distance a0 I a0 is the size of Short/Long crack transition I Anomalous short crack regime is the very basis of fatigue I Critical distance methods (as Point Method PM or Line Method LM) assume a0 as length for averaging stress distribution I Critical distance methods capture notch effect and size effect Summary Summary The Theory of Critical Distances, in metal fatigue subtitle D. Taylor The Theory of Critical Distances: A New Perspective in Fracture Mechanics Elsevier (2007) Introduction Short/Long cracks Non-propagating cracks Notch effect Size effect I The Kitagawa–Takahashi diagram introduce the critical distance a0 I a0 is the size of Short/Long crack transition I Anomalous short crack regime is the very basis of fatigue I Critical distance methods (as Point Method PM or Line Method LM) assume a0 as length for averaging stress distribution I Critical distance methods capture notch effect and size effect Summary