Conoscenza della Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES) tra i pediatri di famiglia Pasquale Comberiati Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona A multicentre retrospective study of 66 Italian children with FPIES: different management for different phenotypes Sopo MS, CEA 2012; 42:1257 No. of FPIES diagnosis at the 3 centers Retrospective study (2004-2010): Rome, Florence, Benevento 18– 16 – 17 14 – 66 children, 165 episodes 35 (53%) OFC diagnosed vs 31 (47%) clinically diagnosed P < 0.001 12 – 13 10 – 8– 6– Tolerance OFC 1-year after last reaction 15 4– 4 4 2004 2005 6 6 2006 2007 2– 0 0000 2008 2009 2010 The prevalence and natural course of FPIES to cow’s milk: A large-scale, prospective population based study. Katz Y, JACI 2011; 127:647 Incidence of CM-FPIES vs IgE-CMA Cohort of 13,019 infant (2004-2006) 0.6 – 28 (64%) OFC vs 16 (36%) clinically diagnosed CM-FPIES Incidence 0.5% 0.4 – % 44 with CM-FPIES and 66 with IgE-CMA 0.2 – 0 0.34% FPIES (n= 44) IgE-CMA (n= 66) FPIES: The diagnosis is often delayed • Lack of suspition • No specific diagnostic tests • Non-specific presenting symptoms Fiocchi A, Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2014, 14:246–254 Differential diagnosis of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) Fiocchi A, Curr Opin All Clin Immunol 2014; 14:246 SEPSIS METABOLIC DISORDES GASTROENTERITIS FPIES SURGICAL ABDOMINAL CONDITION PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCY ANAPHYLAXIS Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES): 16-Year Experience Mehr S, Pediatrics 2009; 123:e459 Episodes of Acute FPIES before diagnosis Retrospective study (1992-2007) 40 – 35 patients, with 66 acute FPIES 30 – % 29% Causative foods, clinical features, treatments, and outcomes 26% 20 – 26% 20% 10 – 0 1 Episodes 2 3 Episodes Episodes 4 Episodes Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES): 16-Year Experience Mehr S, Pediatrics 2009; 123:e459 Additional investigations of FPIES episodes Retrospective study (1992-2007) Causative foods, clinical features, treatments, and outcomes 30 – 34% 28% % 35 patients, with 66 acute FPIES 40 – 20 – 22% 10 – 2% 0 Abdominal Imaging Septic evaluation Surgical Laparotomy consultat OBIETTIVI E METODI • Indagine conoscitiva «FPIES» • Questionario «on-line» anonimo • Google-drive platform • 16 domande risposta multipla • 194 Pediatri di famiglia • Verona (70%) e Torino (30%) Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona Torino RISULTATI Conosco sintomi, diagnosi e terapia 12% Non ho familiarità diagnosi e terapia 49% Sentito solo parlare 31% Mai sentito parlare 8% 0 Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona 10 20 % 30 40 50 RISULTATI – Alimenti trigger 34 Latte Vaccino 5 Latte di Soia 20% ha in cura b.ni con FPIES 14 Pesce 6 Riso Altri cibi solidi (Uovo, Cereali, Pollo, Tacchino, Frutta o Verdura) Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona 24 0 10 20 30 40 50 Prevalence of trigger foods in FPIES Ruffner Caubet Mehr Sopo (n. 462) (n. 160) (n. 35) (n. 66) Cow’s Milk 67% 44% 20% 67% Soy 41% 41% 34% 4% Rice Oats 19% 16% 22% 16% 40% 6% 4% - Fish 1% 10% 3% 12% Poultry 10% 5% 3% 3% Egg 11% 3% - 6% Banana 3.5% - 3% - Caubet JC, JACI 2014; 134: 382-9 Ruffner MA. JACI:In Practice 2013; 1: 343-9 Mehr S. Pediatrics 2009; 123:e459. Sopo MS. CEA 2012;42:1257-65. RISULTATI – Chi ha fatto Diagnosi 49% Allergologo Gastroenterologo 8% Pediatra Ospedale/ Pronto Soccorso 5% 38% Me Medesimo 0 10 20 30 % Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona 40 50 RISULTATI – Casi FPIES FPIES ACUTA FPIES CRONICA FPIES CRONICA 5 mesi, 2 episodi di vomito profuso, pallore e disidratazione comparsi dopo alcune h assunzione crema di riso. 2 mesi, LF dalla nascita, scarsa crescita ponderale, diarrea cronica con muco ± sangue nelle feci, ± leucocitosi. 3 mesi, LF dalla nascita, scarsa crescita ponderale, diarrea cronica con muco ± sangue nelle feci, persistenza sintomi anche dopo inizio eHCF. 54% 47% 23% 13% Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona RISULTATI – Test Diagnostici 1 DIAGNOSI FPIES : Prick Test e/o sIgE devono essere negativi? 70 – 60 – 50 – 40 – 56% 30 – 44% 20 – Caubet JC, JACI 2014; 134: 382-9 10 – 00 Among 160 subjects with FPIES, 24% had positive specific IgE to the FPIES food, which is referred to as ‘‘atypical’’ FPIES SI Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona NO RISULTATI – Test Diagnostici 2 DIAGNOSI FPIES: sempre necessario il TPO? 70 – 60 – 50 – 57% 40 – 43% 30 – 20 – 10 – 00 SI NO FPIES: Diagnosis • There are no in vivo or in vitro tests with demonstrated specificity and sensitivity to diagnose FPIES • OFC may not be necessary to make the diagnosis if the history of FPIES is very compelling (2 or more reactions with typical symptoms to the same food in a 6-month period and elimination of symptoms when the causative food is removed from the diet) Boyce J, J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010;126:S1-S58 Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona RISULTATI – Terapia 1 TERAPIA FPIES «ACUTA» : Adrenalina cardine? 70 – 74% 60 – 50 – 40 – 30 – 20 – 26% 10 – 00 SI Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona NO FPIES: Acute Managment • Oral rehydration fluids (if mild) • Intravenous fluids, 20 ml/kg boluses of isotonic saline (if moderate to severe) • Metilprednisolone ev, 1mg/kg (max 60-80mg) (if moderate to severe) • Epinephrin for hypotension for severe or unresponsive to fluids Järvinen KM, JACI in Pract; 2013; 1:317-22 Natural history of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) Katz Y, Curr Opin All Clin Immunol 2014; 14:229 Cumulative probability of recovery from CMP-induced FPIES Around 90% of FPIES patients recover by the age 3–5 years. Recovery from FPIES to solid foods occurs later than FPIES to Cow’s Milk or Soy. RISULTATI – Terapia 2 A quanti mesi dall’ultima FPIES «acuta» consiglieresti la Reintroduzione dell’alimento? 70 – 60 – 60% 50 – 40 – 30 – 20 – 10 – 17% 15% 6-11 mesi 12-18 mesi 00 Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona 8% 18-24 mesi Allergologo FPIES: Long term Managment • Around 90% of FPIES patients recover by the age 3–5 years. • Oral Food Challenge is warranted to determine when FPIES has resolved • 1st Tolerance-OFC with cow’s milk at 18-20 months of age. • For other foods reports are insufficient, and should be considered for reintroduction to the diet 12–18 months after the last reaction, in a physiciansupervised setting Järvinen KM, JACI in Pract; 2013; 1:317-22 CONCLUSIONE È necessaria una maggiore informazione riguardo all’FPIES, in merito alle diverse forme cliniche ed alla gestione terapeutica acuta ed a lungo termine. Clinica Pediatrica Università di Verona