IA-HySafe Standard benchmark exercise SBEP-V21: Hydrogen release and accumulation within a non-ventilated ambient pressure garage at low release rates A.G.Venetsanos1, I. Tolias1, D. Baraldi7, S. Benz5, B. Cariteau2, J. Garcia3, O.R. Hansen4, C. Jäkel6, S. Ledin8, P. Middha4, E.A. Papanikolaou7 1 Environmental Research Laboratory, National Centre for Scientific Research Demokritos (NCSRD), 15310 Aghia Paraskevi, Attikis, Greece, [email protected] 2 C.E.A. Saclay, D.E.N., D.M.2S., S.F.M.E., Laboratoire d’Etude Expérimentale des Fluides, 91191 Gif/Yvette cedex FRANCE 3 Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM), José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2, E-28006 Madrid, Spain 4 GEXCON AS, Fantoftvegen 38 Box 6015 Postterminalen N-5892 BERGEN Norway 5 IKET, KIT, Postfach 3640, 76021 Karlsruhe, Germany 6 Forschungszentrum Juelich (FZJ), 52425 Juelich, Germany 7 Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC), Institute for Energy, 1755 ZG Petten, The Netherlands 8 Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL), Harpur Hill, Buxton, Derbyshire, SK17 9JN, UK ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA CONTENTS Introduction & Scope Description of CEA Garage Test 5 Modelling strategy Results & discussion Conclusions ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 2 Intro & Scope The Research Committee activities of IAHySafe include: SBEPs to the continuation of SBEPs first introduced within HySafe EC-NoE validate, inter-compare and further develop existing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes and models in predicting hydrogen related release, dispersion and combustion phenomena Focus in the present work: Understanding and prediction of the dispersion / accumulation of hydrogen releases in confined spaces under low release conditions ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 3 CEA Garage Test-5 Re = 115 Garage x-dimension (mm) 5760 Garage y-dimension (mm) 2960 Garage z-dimension (mm) 2420 x release (mm) y release (mm) z release (mm) Exit diameter (mm) Volumetric flow rate - STP (NL/min) He mass flow rate (g/s) -2880 1480 220 29,7 Garage Temperature T (°C) 24,1 Exit velocity (m/s) Release Direction Release Type Release duration (s) 0,47 Upwards Continuous 3740 Released volume - STP (NL) 1122 18 0,054 He released mass (gr) 200,28 Target concentration (%) 2,94% Total measurement time (s) 90440 ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 4 Modelling strategy Participa nt/ Code Turbule nce model Number of computational cells Convective terms Transient terms Vent model Molecular diffusivity (m2/s×10-5) FZJ/CFX SAS-SST 212272 (half garage) 2nd order 2nd order backwards Euler Opening 8.0 k-ε Release: 30888 Diffusion: 4560 2nd order Opening 2.0 k-ε Release: 44352 Diffusion: 7200 2nd order Extension 2.0 2nd order backwards Euler Opening 1.86 GEXCON/ FLACS GEXCON_ revised/ FLACS HSL/CFX SST 88840 High resolution scheme (2nd order) JRC/CFX Laminar Release: 101401 Diffusion: 70429 Outside: 5173 2nd order 2nd order backwards Euler 2m×3m× 3m extension 11.7 k-ε 58905 Upwind 1rst order ALE scheme Opening 7.5 k-ε 53760 Outside: 3360 SMART 3rd order 1rst order fully implicit 1 m × 2.96 m × 2.42 m extension 5.65 Laminar 125516 2nd order 1rst order fully implicit Opening 5.65 Laminar - 1 m × 2.96 m × 2.42 m extension 5.65 KIT/ GASFLOW NCSRD/ ADREAHF UPM/ FLUENT UPM_revi sed/ FLUENT ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 5 Results – Mass balance ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 6 Results – CPU times Participant/ Code Compressibility Simulated period (s) CPU time Threads Computer type FZJ/CFX Fully compressible 20000 s 15d, 21h 3 Intel i7 860 CPU Low Mach 100000 s 1d 1 Linux-PC, Intel Xeon W3550, 3.07 GHz Low Mach 20000 s 5.5h 4 Quad core HSL/CFX Fully compressible 15000 s (coarse mesh) 12000 s (fine) 18d, 5h (coarse) 19d, 15h (fine) 2 Windows XP SP3 64bit, 2 Intel Xeon JRC/CFX Fully compressible 15000 s 9d, 20h 8 3.25 GHz KIT/ GASFLOW Low Mach 20000 2d, 15h 1 Suse Linux 11.2, i7950, 3.06GHz NCSRD/ ADREA-HF Fully compressible 7080 10d 2 Windows 7, i7 M620 CPU at 2.67 GHz UPM/ FLUENT Fully compressible 20000 13d 4 Windows 7, 2 Intel Xeon Quad Core CPUs at 2.4 GHz GEXCON/ FLACS GEXCON_rev ised/ FLACS ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 7 Results - Concentrations Sensor name P1N3 P1N2 P1N1 M1N5 M1N4 M1N3 M1N2 M1N1 z (mm) 2370 2135 1900 1575 1260 945 630 315 ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 8 Results - Concentrations P1N3, z = 2.37 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 9 Results - Concentrations P1N2, z = 2.135 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 10 Results - Concentrations P1N1, z = 1.9 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 11 Results - Concentrations M1N5, z = 1.575 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 12 Results - Concentrations M1N4, z = 1.26 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 13 Results - Concentrations M1N3, z = 0.945 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 14 Results - Concentrations M1N2, z = 0.63 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 15 Results - Concentrations M1N1, z = 0.315 m ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA 16 CONCLUSIONS Relatively good predictions of He concentrations Significant reduction in CPU time with low Mach number solvers Significant effect of extending the computational domain far enough beyond the confined space opening. ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION ANY QUESTIONS ICHS-4, 12-15 Sept. 2011, San Francisco, USA