Thessaloniki, May 22nd ’08
First International
Conference in North Greece
on EMF Healthy and
Environmental Impact
Is the electromagnetic
pollution necessary in urban
areas?
Dr. Prof. Livio Giuliani
Dr. Ing. Francesco Boella
National Institute of Occupational Safety and Prevention
Venice - Italy
Exposures due to previous plants in Don
Sturzo Park area (Venice)
A new cositing is to be implemented in the
middle of the park. Power due to
transmitters
GSM
DCS
UMTS
Pot/settore
[W]
Pot tot
[W]
Pot/settore
[W]
Pot tot
[W]
Pot/settore
[W]
Pot tot
[W]
Pot/settore
[W]
Pot tot
[W]
Gestore 1
9
27
18
54
16,2
48,6
43,2
129,6
Gestore 2
25,2
75,6
20
60
45,2
135,6
19,88
59,64
19,88
59,64
56,08
168,24
108,28
324,84
Gestore 3
34,2
102,6
18
54
Exposures due to previous plants +cositing
Microcells Plus
•
•
•
•
Lower Power
Small spars and lower gain
Small transmitters
No air conditioning
Reduced electromagnetic impact
Reduced urbanic impact
No acoustic noises
Reduced energy supply
Comparing global exposures
(free propagation – maximum gain direction)
6
Macrosito
Intensità del campo elettrico [V/m]
5
4
Microsito
3
2
1
0
0
25
50
75
100
125
150
175
200
225 250
275
Distanza [m]
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
475
500
Buildings in the area
Altezza maggiore di 6 m
Altezza maggiore di 15 m
Altezza maggiore di 12 m
Microcells roof siting (UMTS)
Kathrein 742210
PCPICH = 0,250 W (24 dBm)
PTOT = 2,5 W (34 dBm)
Guadagno = 8,7 dBi
Microcella
Altezza
[m]
Tilt
meccanico
1
15/14
2
2
15/14
2
3
14/13
2
4
14/13
0
5
27/26
3
6
27/26
3
7
17/16
1
8
17/16
1
9
22/21
2
10
18/17
0
11
16/15
0
12
15/14
0
13
18/17
0
Altezza rispetto al suolo
(centro elettrico/edificio)
Microcells roof siting (GSM)
Sira ETEL 61/C
PBCCH = 1 W (30 dBm)
PTOT = 2 W (33 dBm)
Guadagno = 7 dBi
Microcella
Altezza
[m]
Tilt
meccanico
1
15/14
2
2
15/14
2
3
14/13
2
4
14/13
0
5
27/26
3
6
27/26
3
7
22/21
2
8
18/17
0
Altezza rispetto al suolo
(centro elettrico/edificio)
Lightpoles siting
(GSM+DCS+UMTS)
Kathrein 738445
UMTS
PCPICH = 0,250 W (24 dBm)
PTOT = 2,5 W (34 dBm)
GSM
PBCCH = 1 W (30 dBm)
PTOT = 2 W (33 dBm)
DCS
PBCCH = 1 W (30 dBm)
PTOT = 2 W (33 dBm)
Microcella
Altezza
[m]
Tilt
meccanico
1
15
0
2(1)
15
0
3
15
0
4(1)
15
0
5(1)
15
0
7(1)
15
0
8(1),(2)
15
0
9(1)
15
0
10(1)
15
0
Altezza rispetto al suolo
1 Microcelle UMTS+GSM+DCS
2 La microcella 8 è stata simulata in corrispondenza a due posizioni distinte su pali contigui; nel calcolo dell’esposizione per la microcella 8 vengono calcolate
contemporaneamente le due collocazioni suddividendo 2 UMTS + 1 GSM sul primo palo e 1 UMTS + 1 GSM + 1 DCS sul secondo
Localization of microcells in the area
In ROSSO i PALI – In BLU gli EDIFICI
Comparing environmental exposures
Micrositi edifici
Co-siting gestori
Micrositi pali
Previous plants exposures
Previous plants + microcells on the roof of
buildings
Previous plants + microcells on lightpoles
Previous plants + cositing projected by providers
To warrant the area coverage for mobil
phone services
(free propagation – maximum gaid direction)
3
Macrocella
Intensità del campo elettrico [V/m]
2.5
2
1.5
Microcelle
1
0.5
Soglia UM TS 0,002
0
0
25
50
75
100
125 150 175
200 225
250 275 300
Distanza [m]
325 350 375
400 425 450
475 500
Comparing the coverage (microcells on the
roof of
buildings)
G
S
M
Macrosito
Microcelle
U
M
T
S
Comparing the coverage (microcells on
lightpoles)
G
S
M
Macrosito
Microcelle
U
M
T
S
Spars
Edifici
Pali
Transmitters
Radio over Fiber
Comparing powers (at the connectio of the
spar)
Micrositi Edifici
Micrositi Pali
Macrosito
Potmax/cella
[W]
Pot tot
[W]
Potmax/cella
[W]
Pot tot
[W]
Pot/settore
[W]
Pot tot
[W]
13,5
145,5
13,5
109,5
108,28
324,84
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
• THERE ARE IDEOLOGICAL AND
POLITICAL REASONS BUT INDUSTRIAL
TO DELIVERY WORLDWIDE WARM
CELLS TO PROVIDE MOBIL PHONE
SERVICES. IN FACT THE
ARCHITECTURE OF A NET BASED ON
MICROCELLS IS MORE EFFICIENT IF
THE INTERCONNECTION WITH FIBER IS
HIGH. THAT WAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO
EMPLOY THE WIRE NET IN EUROPE.