Primi materiali per il progetto di ricerca
Indice
I – Documenti comunitari .......................................................................................................................2
II – Atti del giudizio civile USA ..............................................................................................................3
III – La proposta Google di Settlement......................................................................................................4
IV – I possibili procedimenti antitrust relativi a Google books .................................................................5
A – Negli USA...................................................................................................................................5
B – Avanti alla Commissione Ce ......................................................................................................5
C – All’Autorità garante della concorrenza e del mercato ................................................................5
V – Prese di posizione di altri soggetti interessati ....................................................................................6
VI – Rassegna stampa parziale su Google books ........................................................................................
A – Corriere della Sera ........................................................................................................................
B – Il Sole 24 ore.................................................................................................................................
C – La Repubblica ...............................................................................................................................
D – La Stampa.....................................................................................................................................
E – Altri documenti reperibili su Internet ..........................................................................................
VII – CHARLES W. BAILEY JR, Book search bibliography su Google books ..............................................
1
I– Documenti comunitari
1. Comunicazione della Commissione al Parlamento Europeo, al Consiglio, al Comitato
economico e sociale europeo e al Comitato delle regioni - i2010 : le biblioteche digitali
{SEC(2005) 1194} {SEC(2005) 1195}, 30 settembre 2005, in http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0465:FIN:IT:HTML
2. Libro verde – Il diritto d’autore nell’economia della conoscenza, 16 luglio 2008, in
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/copyright-infso/greenpaper_en.pdf
3. Information hearing on the Google book settlment agreement, Bruxelles, 7 settembre
2009,
in
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/09/376&format=HTML
&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en
4. Programma del Public hearing on Orphan works, Bruxelles, 26 ottobre 2009, in
http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/copyright/docs/copyrightinfso/agenda_ow_250909.pdf
2
II – Atti del giudizio civile USA
A – Atti delle parti principali
5. The
Author's
Guild
et
al
v.
Google
Inc.,
http://news.justia.com/cases/featured/new-york/nysdce/1:2005cv08136/273913/
in
B – Interventi di amicus curiae
A) Stati federati USA
6. Texas, September 4, 2009, in http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/connecticut.pdf
7. Connecticut, 8 settembre, 2009, in http://thepublicindex.org/docs/objections/missouri.pdf
8. Pennsylvania, Washington, and Massachusetts,
11 settembre 2009, in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/objections/PA-WA-MA.pdf
9. Missouri, 15 settembre, 2009, in http://thepublicindex.org/docs/objections/missouri.pdf
B) Autori - dottrina USA
10. Declaration of David Nimmer, in support of objection of Amazon, 1 settembre 2009, in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/nimmer.pdf
11. American Law Institute (ALI) and ALI-ABA Continuing Professional Education,
September 1, 2009, in http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/ali.pdf
12. Declaration
of
Pamela
Samuelson,
3
settembre
2009,
in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/samuelson.pdf
13. Antitrust
Law
and
Economics
Professors,
September
8,
2009,
in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/antitrust_profs.pdf
C) Altri privati interessati
14. Declaration of Amazon, 1.9.2009, in http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/amazon.pdf
15. Declaration of Microsoft, 8.92009, in http://thepublicindex.org/docs/objections/
microsoft.pdf
16. Declararation
of
Free
Software
Foundation,
8
settembre
2009,
in
http://thepublicindex.org/
docs/letters/fsf.pdf
17. Declaration
of
Yahoo,
8
settembre
2009,
in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/yahoo.pdf
18. Association of College and Research Libraries (ACRL), American Library Association
(ALA) and Association of Research Libraries (ARL), May 12, 2009, in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/acrl_ala_arl.pdf
19. American Society of Media Photographers, et al., September 2, 2009, in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/asmp.pdf
20. The Songwriters Guild of America (SGA), 8 settembre 2009, in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/objections/sga.pdf
21. Osservazioni di AIE alla United States District Court – Southern District of New York, 4
settembre
2009,
http://www.aie.it/Portals/_default/Skede/Allegati/Skeda105-247242009.9.4/AIE%20objection%20-%20DEF%202.pdf?IDUNI=yqr20355ufartvallqzpm2v15
355
3
III – La proposta Google di Settlement
22. Accordo
di
transazione
(senza
allegati),
http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/r/view_settlement_agreement
23. Allegati
all’accordo
di
transazione,
http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/r/view_settlement_agreement
24. Allegati
all’accordo
di
transazione,
http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/r/view_settlement_agreement
25. Transazione
di
Google
ricerca
libri,
Guida,
http://www.googlebooksettlement.com/help/bin/answer.py?answer=118704&hl=it#q0
26. Google books, Accordo di transazione di Google Ricerca Libri, in
http://books.google.com/intl/it/googlebooks/agreement/
4
in
in
in
in
IV – I possibili procedimenti antitrust relativi a Google books
A – Negli USA
27. Lettera
di
Google
al
FTC,
31
agosto
2009,
in
http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/090903bcpgoogleletter.pdf
28. Risposta
della
FTC
a
Google,
2
settembre
2009,
in
http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/090903horvathletter.pdf
29. Statement of Commissioner Pamela Jones Harbour, 3 settembre 2009, in
http://www.ftc.gov/speeches/harbour.shtm
30. Statement of chairman Jon Leibowitz in response to letters between Google and FTC
staff,
3
settembre
2009,in
http://phonedonotcall.com/os/closings/090903leibowitzstatement.pdf
31. Comments of APA, ESA, MPAA e RIAA, 9 febbraio 2009, in
http://www.fct.gov/os/closings//09090riaaletter.pdf
B – Avanti alla Commissione Ce
32. Information hearing on the Google book settlment agreement, Bruxelles, 7 settembre
2009,
in
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=MEMO/09/376&format=HTML
&aged=0&language=EN&guiLanguage=en [fare link]
C – All’Autorità garante della concorrenza e del mercato
33. Considerazioni dell’AGCM su Google, in
http://www.agcm.it/agcm_ita/NEWS/NEWS.NSF/fa39d3e0de739461c125676e00373f19/
867d088483577898c125761f002faeff/$FILE/A420.pdf
5
V – Prese di posizione di altri soggetti interessati
34. GESAC (European grouping of socities of authors and composers) RE: Commission
hearing on the Google books agreement, documenti inviati da ALAI.
35. Analisi di 18 importanti autori italiani nel database di Google, 3 settembre 2009, in
http://www.datamanager.it/systemFiles/files/analisiAIE.pdf
36. Gli editori italiani contro il Google Books Settlement, 4 settembre 2009 in
http://www.aie.it/VIS/VIS_News_Blu.aspx?IDUNI=1a3hvu55oapn4o2cta3nj1556127&M
odDestId=1041&Skeda=MODIF102-24722-2009.9.4
37. Anche la FEP contro il Google Books Settlement. E rilancia Arrow come valida
alternativa
europea,
4
settembre
2009
in
http://www.aie.it/VIS/VIS_News_Blu.aspx?IDUNI=1a3hvu55oapn4o2cta3nj1556127&M
odDestId=1041&Skeda=MODIF102-24722-2009.9.4
38. The
Japan
Visual
Copyright
Association,
September
10,
2009,
in
http://thepublicindex.org/docs/letters/JVCA.pdf
39. R. Natale, Google books: l’editotria si divide tra difensori e non. Quale futuro per il
mercato
del
libro
digitale?
21
settembre
2009,
in
http://www.key4biz.it/News/2009/09/21/Contenuti/Massimiliano_Magrini_google_ebook
_libro_digitale_biblioteca_digitale_diritto_d_autore_Aie.html
6
V – Rassegna stampa parziale su Google books
A - Corriere della Sera
40. C. TAGLIETTI, I libri di Google: in 4 minuti 300 pagine, 19 settembre 2009, in
http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2009/settembre/19/libri_Google_minuti_300_pagine_co_
8_090919021.shtml
41. S. D’AMBROSIO, Con Google Books arriva il libro espresso, 17 settembre 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/09_settembre_17/google_libri_on_demand_d
8f9e2e2-a384-11de-a213-00144f02aabc.shtml
42. L'Europa si schiera contro Google Books, 7 settembre 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/09_settembre_07/google_books_editori_euro
pei_contrari_b6ed3c48-9ba6-11de-88f0-00144f02aabc.shtml
43. LUIGI OFEDDU, E’ vuota la grande biblioteca online, 4 settembre 2009, in
1. http://www.corriere.it/cronache/09_settembre_04/vuota_biblioteca_on_line_offeddu_7
6a32ab0-9919-11de-b514-00144f02aabc.shtml
44. Libri
online
Berlino
contro
Google,
3
settembre
2009,
in
http://archiviostorico.corriere.it/2009/settembre/03/Libri_online_Berlino_contro_Google
_co_9_090903013.shtml
45. SIMONE D’AMBROSIO, Amazon ricorre contro Google Books, 3 settembre 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/09_settembre_07/google_books_editori_euro
pei_contrari_b6ed3c48-9ba6-11de-88f0-00144f02aabc.shtml
46. ARMANDO TORNO, La Cina fotocopia il mondo, 28 agosto 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/cultura/09_agosto_28/cina_fotocopia_torno_mondo_17b8df9c939a-11de-8445-00144f02aabc.shtml
47. Google Italia: istruttoria dell’Antitrust per abuso di posizione dominante, 27 agosto 2009,
in
http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/09_agosto_27/google_italia_istruttoria_antit
rust_795cad58-92ed-11de-9adc-00144f02aabc.shtml
48. PIERLUIGI PANZA, Le biblioteche: si a Google. Milioni di volumi sul web, 27 agosto 2009,
in
2. http://www.corriere.it/cronache/09_agosto_27/biblioteceh_google_panza_114e53e892c9-11de-9adc-00144f02aabc.shtml?fr=correlati
49. SIMONE D’AMBROSIO, Microsoft e Yahoo, alleanza anti-Google, 29 luglio 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/09_luglio_29/microsoft_yahoo_intesa_anti_g
oogle_5c128d58-7c31-11de-bec1-00144f02aabc.shtml
50. GIANCARLO RADICE, «New York Times» online a pagamento. Lettera anti-google degli
editori
UE,
11
luglio
2009,
in
http://www.corriere.it/economia/09_luglio_11/radice_nyt_online_pagamento_40e92af86df1-11de-b947-00144f02aabc.shtml
51. MARCO BARDAZZI, Obama mette sotto inchiesta Google, 10 giugno 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/esteri/09_giugno_10/obama_google_5c4cdc8c-55ea-11de-8b3800144f02aabc.shtml
3. SIDERI MASSIMO, Biblioteca Google, indaga l'antitrust, 29 aprile 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/09_aprile_29/google_antitrust_libri_3f127
2ee-34ac-11de-b6cb-00144f02aabc.shtml
52. EMANUELA DI PASQUA, Europeana porta online tutto il sapere del vecchio continente, 19
novembre
2008,
in
http://www.corriere.it/cultura/08_novembre_19/europeana_di_pasqua_0714ed20-b63c11dd-909d-00144f02aabc.shtml?fr=correlati
B – Il sole 24Ore
53. RICCARDO CHIABERGE, Stupidario della Googloteca, 14 settembre 2009, in
http://riccardochiaberge.blog.ilsole24ore.com/2009/09/il-1899-Size: 4076
54. Libri online, Google pronta a concessioni verso editori europei, 07 settembre 2009, in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia e Business/2009/09/googlebooks-concessioni.shtml
55. ANTONIO DINI, Berlino a Google: no ai libri digitali, 04 settembre 2009, in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia e Business/2009/09/berlinogoogel-no-ai-libri-digitali.shtml
56. STEFANO SALIS, Editori italiani contro Google Books: database zeppo di errori, 04
settembre
2009,
in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia
e
Business/2009/09/editori-contro-google-books.shtml
57. Le biblioteche italiane in rete con Boogle books, 26 agosto 2009, in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia e Business/2009/08/googlebooks-ministero-beni-culturali.shtml
7
58. LUCA SALVIOLI, Microsoft, Yahoo e Amazon insieme contro i libri digitali di Google, 21
agosto 2009,
in http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia e
Business/2009/08/microsoft-yahoo-amazon.shtml
59. La conoscenza sotto scanner. Google realizza il più grande simposio virtuale, 30 luglio
2009,
in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Mondo/2009/07/googlebiblioteche-scanner.shtml
60. LUCA SALVIOLI, Amazon e Google lanciano una sfida nuova, 25 giugno 2009, in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia e Business/2009/06/kindleereader-amazon.shtml
61. Class contro Google per il «book search», 29 aprile 2009, in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia e Business/2009/04/googlebook-search.shtml
62. LUCA SALVIOLI, Libri online, Google trova l'accordo con editori e autori, 27 gennaio
2009,
in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia
e
Business/2009/01/google-copyright-usa-wsj.shtml
63. MATTEO VANNUCCHI, Tutto il sapere del mondo?, 29 ottobre 2008, in
http://matteovannucchi.nova100.ilsole24ore.com/2008/10/tutto-il-sapere.html
64. GIANLUIGI TORCHIANI, Microsoft contro Google: «Viola sistematicamente il copyright», 6
marzo
2007,
in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Finanza
e
Mercati/2007/03/microsoft-contro-google.shtml
Il Sole 24h.com, Le biblioteche italiane in rete con Google Books, 26 agosto 2009, in
http://www.ilsole24ore.com/art/SoleOnLine4/Tecnologia%20e%20Business/2009/08/google-booksministero-beni-culturali.shtml?uuid=e796b18a-9237-11de-b4613e287591c467&DocRulesView=Libero
C– La Repubblica
65. ANDREA TARQUINI, Merkel contro Google "Basta con i libri gratis su Internet", 12 ottobre
2009, in http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/10/12/merkelcontro-google-basta-con-libri-gratis.html
66. ANDREA TARQUINI, Fermiamo Google la Merkel in campo per il diritto d' autore, 12
ottobre
2009,
in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/10/12/fermiamo-googlela-merkel-in-campo-per.html
67. GIAMPIERO MARTINOTTI, È scontro legale tra editori francesi e Google books, 26
settembre,
in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/09/26/scontro-legale-traeditori-francesi-google.html
68. MAURIZIO BONO, Editori italiani contro Google Books, 05 settembre 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/09/05/editori-italianicontro-google-books.html
69. ANDREA BONANNI, Google punta all' Europa a Bruxelles l' ultima partita per il tesoro dei
libri
online,
08
settembre
2009,
in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/09/08/google-punta-alleuropa-bruxelles-ultima.html
70. LAURA MONTANARI, Nazionale: su Google 300mila libri, 02 settembre 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/09/02/nazionale-sugoogle-300mila-libri.html
71. Accordo con Google Digitalizzati a Firenze 300 mila libri, 02 settembre 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/09/02/nazionale-sugoogle-300mila-libri.html
72. Google si allea con Espresso Book Machine le librerie faranno i tascabili di 2 milioni di
titoli,
18
settembre
2009,
in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/09/18/google-si-alleacon-espresso-book-machine.html
73. LUCA IEZZI, Google Italia nel mirino dell' Antitrust, 28 agosto 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/08/28/google-italia-nelmirino-dell-antitrust.html
74. ALESSANDRA ROTA, Libri online Amazon-Microsoft contro Google, 22 agosto 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/08/22/libri-onlineamazon-microsoft-contro-google.html
75. DARIO PAPPALARDO, Le biblioteche e Google, il futuro è digitale, 26 agosto 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/08/26/le-bibliotechegoogle-il-futuro-digitale.html
8
76. La
BNF
si
allea
con
Google,
19
agosto
2009,
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/08/19/la-bnf-si-alleacon-google.html
77. Resca: su Google Books le Biblioteche italiane, 27 agosto 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/08/27/resca-su-googlebooks-le-biblioteche-italiane.html
78. PIETRO JOZZELLI, Firenze guardata da Google Earth, 21 agosto 2009, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2009/08/21/firenze-guardatada-google-earth.html
79. ANTONIO GNOLI, Google e la biblioteca di borges, 30 ottobre 2008, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2008/10/30/google-labiblioteca-di-borges.html
80. Il progetto Google News Archive On line tutti i giornali dal 1764, 15 settembre 2008, in
http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2008/09/15/il-progettogoogle-news-archive-on-line.html
D – La Stampa
81. La Stampa, Google Books, l'Antitrust boccia l'accordo con gli editori, 19 settembre 2009,
in
http://www.lastampa.it/_web/cmstp/tmplrubriche/tecnologia/grubrica.asp?ID_blog=30&I
D_articolo=6662&ID_sezione=38&sezione=#
E– Altri documenti vari reperibili su internet
82. Dichiarazione di Mario Resca (Direttore Generale per la valorizzazione del patrimonio
culturale del Ministero) – notizia del 26 agosto, in http://www.ilsole24ore.com. Altre fonti
sono reperibili in http://cab.unime.it
83. Risposta dell’Associazione Italiana Biblioteche al Green paper on Copyright in the
Knowledge Economy, in http://www.aib.it/aib/cen/copyr0811-e.htm,
e in
http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/markt/markt_consultations/library?l=/copyright_neighbou
ring/consultation_copyright/associazione_biblioteche/_EN_1.0_&a=d
84. ICTX, Google books e lo sviluppo dell’industria culturale, 30 marzo 2009, in
http://www.ictlex.net/?p=1014
85. Classa action Italia, La Siae aderisce alla class action contro Google Book Search, 31
marzo 2009, in http://www.class-action-italia.it/la-siae-aderisce-alla-class-action-controgoogle-book-search/449/
86. Internet archive, Google books ha il monopolio culturale, 20 aprile 2009, in
http://www.webnews.it/news/leggi/10584/internet-archive-google-books-ha-il-monopolio/
87. Il Sofwtare.it, Contro Google Books in campo Microsoft, Yahoo e Amazon, 26 agosto
2009, in http://www.ilsoftware.it/articoli.asp?id=5463
88. IGN, Biblioteche: Polillo (AIE), digitalizzazione interessante ma nel rispetto del diritto
d'autore,
26
agosto
2009,
in
http://www.adnkronos.com/IGN/News/CyberNews/?id=3.0.3698601332
89. Digital Lex, Google Books offrirà da oggi download gratuiti di oltre un milione di libri,
28
agosto
2009,
in
http://www.digitallex.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=862&Itemid=
112
90. Google
books:
filantropia
o
pirateria?,
31
agosto
2009,
in
http://www.downloadblog.it/post/10663/google-books-filantropia-o-pirateria
91. Comunicatori pubblici, GoogleBooks e Europeana: un mondo di libri in digitale, 3
settembre 2009, in http://www.comunicatoripubblici.it/index.html?id=165&n_art=4773
92. Key4biz, Google books, Stop dalle autorità tedesche: senza il consenso degli autori
impossibile
procedere,
3
settembre
2009,
in
http://www.key4biz.it/Vinti/2009/09/google_books_digitalizzare_libri_scanner_germania
_accordo_ebook_rifiuto_diritto_autore_copyright.html
93. Quo media, Gb: editore firma accordo con Google Books, 3 settembre 2009, in
http://quomedia.diesis.it/news/18860/gb-editore-firma-accordo-con-google-books
94. Giacomo Dotta, Microsoft e la Francia contro Google books, 4 settembre 2009,
Webnews-business,
in
http://business.webnews.it/news/leggi/11399/microsoft-e-lafrancia-contro-google-books/
95. Tecnozoom, Google Books: no secco da parte della Germania, 4 settembre 2009, in
http://news.tecnozoom.it/curiosita/google-books-no-secco-da-parte-della-germania-post10463.html
9
96. Corriere della sera.it, L'Europa si schiera contro Google Books, 7 settembre 2009, in
http://www.corriere.it/scienze_e_tecnologie/09_settembre_07/google_books_editori_euro
pei_contrari_b6ed3c48-9ba6-11de-88f0-00144f02aabc.shtml
97. Valerio Porcu, Google books è come la peste, per gli editori, in ICT business, 7 settembre
2009, in http://www.tomshw.it/news.php?newsid=19293
98. Marketingjournal, Editoria europea contro Google Books, 7 settembre 2009, in
http://www.marketingjournal.it/editoria-europea-google-books-2/
99. Data Manager on line, Progetto Arrow come valida alternativa a Google Books, 7
settembre
2009,
in
http://www.datamanager.it/cms/view/sezioni_web/web/progetto_arrow_come_valida_alte
rnativa_a_google_books/s157/c81679
100.
Dirittodautore.it, Google Books: gli editori italiani ed europei sono contrari a un
regime speciale dei diritti d’autore a favore di una singola impresa, denunciano i rischi di
monopolio e scelte tecnologiche inadeguate,
8 settembre 2009, in
http://www.dirittodautore.it/page.asp?mode=News&IDNews=4835
101.
Pubblica amministrazione.net, Google Books, accordi in vista in USA e UE, 8
settembre
2009,
in
http://www.pubblicaamministrazione.net/governance/news/1981/google-books-accordiin-vista-in-usa-e-ue.html
102.
Risposta dell’Associazione Italiana Biblioteche al Green paper on Copyright in the
Knowledge
Economy,
http://www.aib.it/aib/cen/copyr0811-e.htm,
e
http://circa.europa.eu/Public/irc/markt/markt_consultations/library?l=/copyright_neighbou
ring/consultation_copyright/associazione_biblioteche/_EN_1.0_&a=d
103.
Punto Informatico ,Italia, AIE fa le pulci a Google books, 4 settembre 2009, in
http://punto-informatico.it/2702934/PI/News/italia-aie-fa-pulci-google-books.aspx
104.
Quo Media, Google books: Francia chiede il rispetto dei diritti d’autore, 8 settembre
2009,
http://quomedia.diesis.it/news/18892/google-books-francia-chiede-rispetto-deidiritti-dautore
105.
Diario del web, La Francia vuole il rispetto dei diritti d’autore, 8 settembre 2009, in
http://www.diariodelweb.it/Articolo/?d=20090908&id=103291
106.
Punto Informatico, USA, Google books esagera, in 11 settembre 2009, in
http://punto-informatico.it/2707199/PI/News/usa-google-books-esagera.aspx
107.
Media Duemila, Google books, dai colossi Hi Tech allarme per il monopolio digitale,
15 settembre 2009, in http://www.mediaduemila.it/?p=989
10
VI – CHARLES W. BAILEY JR, Book search bibliography su Google books
aggiornata al 14 settembre 2009 e disponibile in http://www.digital-scholarship.org/gbsb/gbsb.htm
1. Albanese, Andrew. AAP Sues Google over Scan Plan Library Journal, 15 November
2005. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6282641.html
2. AAUP, Google Needs to Move More. Publishers Weekly, 23 August 2005, in
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6250473.html
3. AAUP, Pressures Google Print: Can Digitizing Library Material Represent
Infringement?,
in
Library
Journal,
15
July
2005.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA622706.html
4. ALA/ARL Issues Guide to Google Settlement. Library Journal, 19 November 2008, in
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6615546.html
5. As Google Settlement Hits Homestretch, Libraries Push for Changes. Publishers
Weekly,
26
August
2009,
in
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6685906.html
6. At NYPL, No 'Smackdown' This Time As Panel Pushes For Google Book Search
Settlement.
Publishers
Weekly,
29
July
2009,
in.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6673684.html
7. Confusion Lingers over Google Settlement. Publishers Weekly, 3 August 2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6674283.html
8. Darnton Essay Sparks Google Discussion, but Misunderstandings Persist. Library
Journal, 3 February 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6634361.html
9. Deal or No Deal: What if the Google Settlement Fails? Publishers Weekly, 25 May
2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6660295.html
10. Delay Looming for Google Settlement Deadline? Publishers Weekly, 27 April 2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6654551.html
11. Europe Spotlights Google Books. Publishers Weekly, 17 August 2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6676976.html
12. European Booksellers Slam Google Book Settlement. Library Journal, 2 December
2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6619104.html
13. Europeans Seem to Know Little about Google Settlement, but Enough Not to Like It.
Publishers
Weekly,
22
April
2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6653182.html
14. Extension, Possible Review Challenge Google Settlement. Publishers Weekly, 4 May
2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6655853.html
15. Google Book Deal Gets 'Preliminary' Court Approval; More Boosters Emerge. Library
Journal, 21 November 2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6616456.html
16. Google Deadline Delayed Four Months as Steinbeck Motion Granted. Publishers
Weekly, 28 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6654845.html
17. Google
Pauses
Scan
Plan.
Library
Journal,
1
September
2005.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6251475.html
18. Google Scanning Deal Details Provoke New Controversy. Publishers Weekly, 15 June
2007. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6452409.html
19. Google Scans, Contract Released: Search Firm Also Will Link to Archives, Allow
Downloads.
Library
Journal,
1
October
2005,
14-15.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6373321.html
20. Google Settles Landmark Lawsuit over Book Scanning. Library Journal, 28 October
2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6609195.html
21. Is Google Deal a Setback for Rival Digitization Efforts? Library Journal, 25 November
2008. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6617695.html
22. Judge Rejects Internet Archive Motion to Intervene in Google Settlement. Publishers
Weekly, 24 April 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6654190.html
23. Libraries Reserve Early Comment, but Some See Bright Side in Google Book Search
Settlement.
Library
Journal,
28
October
2008.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6609159.html
24. Library Leaders Meet to Discuss Google Book Search Deal. Library Journal, 17
February 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6638100.html
25. Library Organizations to File Amicus Brief in Google Book Search Settlement. Library
Journal, 26 February 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6640461.html
26. Major Objection to Google Book Search Settlement Is Filed. Publishers Weekly, 19
August 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6678673.html
27. New York Law School to Launch Google Book Search Web Site.Publishers Weekly, 6
May 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6656797.html
11
28. One for All? As Google Deal Is Evaluated, Critics Question Single Library Terminal.
Library
Journal,
11
November
2008.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6613723.html
29. Publisher: No Thanks, Google. Library Journal, 1 November 2005, 18.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6277398.htm
30. Resistance Grows as Google Deadline Nears. Publishers Weekly, 20 April 2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6652472.html
31. Talking about Google Settlement, Publisher Cites Monopoly, Duopoly, and New
Library
Sales.Library
Journal,
27
February
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6640464.html
32. Time Nears to Opt Out of Google Deal.Publishers Weekly, 31 August 2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6686609.html?nid=3329
33. Unsettled: The PW Survey on the Google Book Settlement.Publishers Weekly, 24
August 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6685412.html
34. U.S. Register of Copyrights Slams Google Book Search Settlement.Publishers Weekly,
10 September 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6695829.html
35. Albanese, Andrew, and Norman Oder. In Wide-Ranging Interview, Google Talks
Books.Library
Journal,
13
March
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6643470.html
36. Albanese, Andrew, and Calvin Reid. Google Settlement Supporters Ready to State
Case.Publishers
Weekly,
8
June
2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6663287.html
37. Andriani, Lynn. Creative Commons License Holders Distributing Content on Google
Books.Publishers
Weekly,
13
August
2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6676729.html
38. Baksik, Corinna. Fair Use or Exploitation? The Google Book Search
Controversy.portal: Libraries & the Academy 6, no. 4 (2006): 399-415.
39. Band, Jonathan. The Google Library Project: Both Sides of the Story.Information
Outlook 10, no. 6 (2006): 35-54. http://www.plagiary.org/Google-Library-Project.pdf
40. The Google Print Library Project: A Copyright Analysis.ARL: A Bimonthly Report on
Research Library Issues and Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 242 (2005): 69. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlbr242google.pdf
41. A Guide for the Perplexed: Libraries & the Google Library Project Settlement.
Washington, DC: American Library Association and the Association of Research
Libraries, 2008. http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/google-settlement-13nov08.pdf
42. A Guide for the Perplexed Part II: The Amended Google-Michigan Agreement.
Washington, DC: American Library Association, Association of College and Research
Libraries,
and
Association
of
Research
Libraries,
2009.
http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/google-michigan-12jun09.pdf
43. Banks, Marcus A. The Excitement of Google Scholar, the Worry of Google
Print.Biomedical
Digital
Libraries
2
(Article
2
2005).
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1079792
44. Banks, Michael A. An Author Looks at Google Book Search.Online 30, no. 2 (2006):
15-17.
45. Bearman, David. Jean-Noöl Jeanneney's Critique of Google: Private Sector Book
Digitization and Digital Library Policy.D-Lib Magazine 12, no. 12 (2006).
http://www.dlib.org/dlib/december06/bearman/12bearman.html
46. Bender, Mark R. Google's Book Search: An Australian Copyright Perspective.SSRN,
2007. http://ssrn.com/abstract=981664
47. Bisk, J. S. B. Book Search Is Beautiful?: An Analysis of Whether Google Book Search
Violates International Copyright Law.Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology
17, no. 1 (2007): 271-310.
48. Bjørner, Susanne. Google Library Project Expands to Spain.Information Today
NewsBreaks
&
the
Weekly
News
Digest,
9
October
2006.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=18352
49. Caldwell, Tracey. Google Settles Legal Woes with Creation of $125M Book Rights
Registry.Information
World
Review,
3
December
2008.
http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/features/2231863/tight-embrace
50. Carlson, Scott. Publishers Sue Google to Prevent Scanning of Copyrighted Works.The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 28 October 2005, A43.
51. U. of California Is in Talks to Join Google's Library-Scanning Project.The Chronicle of
Higher Education, 11 August 2006, A29.
52. U. of California Will Provide Up to 3,000 Books a Day for Google to Scan.The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 8 September 2006, A32.
12
53. Carlson, Scott, and Jeffrey R. Young. Google Will Digitize and Search Millions of
Books from 5 Top Research Libraries.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 June
2005, A37-A40.
54. Carnevale, Dan. Google Strikes a Deal With 12 Universities to Digitize 10 Million
Books.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 15 June 2007, A35.
55. U. of Michigan Unveils Its Book-Scanning Contract With Google.The Chronicle of
Higher Education, 20 June 2005.
56. Chillingworth, Mark. Magazine Search Unlikely Say Google.Information World
Review,
17
October
2007.
http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-worldreview/news/2201300/magazine-search-unlikely-say
57. Publishers in Race to Match Google.Information World Review, 30 May 2006.
http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2157106/publishers-race-matchgoogle
58. Coleman, Mary Sue. Riches We Must Share . . .The Washington Post, 22 October
2005,
A21.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2005/10/21/AR2005102101451.html
59. Costantino, Melanie. Fairly Used: Why Google's Book Project Should Prevail under
the Fair Use Defense.Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law
Journal 17 (Autumn 2006): 235-277.
60. Courant, Paul N. Scholarship and Academic Libraries (and Their Kin) in the World of
Google.First
Monday
11,
no.
8
(2006).
http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1382
61. Crawford, Walt. Book Searching: OCA/GBS Update.Cites & Insights: Crawford at
Large 7, no. 1 (2007). http://citesandinsights.info/v7i1b.htm
62. Discovering Books: OCA & GBS Retrospective.Cites & Insights: Crawford at Large 8,
no. 1 (2008). http://citesandinsights.info/v8i1c.htm
63. Discovering Books: The OCA/GBS Saga Continues.Cites & Insights: Crawford at
Large 6, no. 6 (2006). http://citesandinsights.info/v6i6a.htm
64. OCA and GLP 1: Ebooks, Etext, Libraries and the Commons.Cites & Insights:
Crawford at Large 5, no. 14 (2005). http://citesandinsights.info/v5i14a.htm
65. OCA and GLP 2: Steps on the Digitization RoadCites & Insights: Crawford at Large 5,
no. 14 (2005). http://citesandinsights.info/v5i14d.htm
66. Dames, K. Matthew. Library Organizations Should Support Google Book
Search.Online 30, no. 2 (2006): 18-19.
67. Darnton, Robert. Google & the Future of Books.The New York Review of Books 56,
no. 2 (2009). http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22281
68. Deahl, Rachel. Authors Guild Claims William Morris 'Off Target' on Google
Settlement.Publishers
Weekly,
10
August
2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6675745.html
69. Guild Responds to Second WME Letter on Google Settlement.Publishers Weekly, 17
August 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6677168.html
70. Drake, Miriam A. University of Michigan President Distresses Scholarly
Publishers.Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 13 February
2006. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=15987
71. Drummond, David. Why We Believe in Google Print.Google Blog, 19 October
2005.http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/why-we-believe-in-google-print.html
72. Duguid, Paul. Inheritance and Loss? A Brief Survey of Google Books.First Monday
12,
no.
8
(2007).
http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1972
73. Dye, Jessica. The Digital Rights Issues: Behind Book Digitization Projects.EContent
29, no. 1 (2006): 32-4, 36-7.
74. Ekman, Richard. The Books Google Could Open.Washington Post, 22 August 2006.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/08/21/AR2006082101149.html
75. Erwin, Jeffrey J. Copyright and the Digital Library.E-LIS, 2008.
http://eprints.rclis.org/15074/
76. Fisher, Janet. The Google Book Search Settlement.Learned Publishing 22, no. 2
(2009): 82-83.
77. Foster, Andrea L. Google Counters Critics of Library Project.The Chronicle of Higher
Education 10 March 2006, A32.
78. Reading Bad News Between the Lines of Google Book Search.The Chronicle of
Higher Education, 25 January 2008 A19.
13
79. Fraser, Eric M. Antitrust and the Google Books Settlement: The Problem of
Simultaneity.SSRN,
2009.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1417722
80. Gamble, Aundrea. Google's Book Search Project: Searching for Fair Use or
Infringement.Tulane Journal of Technology & Intellectual Property 9 (Spring 2007):
365-384.
81. Ganley, Paul, Google Book Search: Fair Use, Fair Dealing and the Case for
Intermediary Copying.SSRN, 2006. http://ssrn.com/abstract=875384
82. Gbegnon, Kodj. Digitized Scholarship and the 'Library' Concept: Allowing the History
of the Library Exemption to Inform How We View Google's Digitized
Library.Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 29, no. 1 (2006):
75-98.
83. Geist, Michael. Digitization of Canada's Heritage Left to Google.The Toronto Star, 7
September 2009, B03. http://www.thestar.com/sciencetech/article/691772
84. Gibson, James. Google's New Monopoly?The Washington Post, 3 November 2008,
A21.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2008/11/02/AR2008110201721.html
85. Givler, Peter. Google and the Book Publishers: Testing the Limits of Fair Use in the
Digital Environment.NYSBA Bright Ideas 14, no. 2 (2005): 23-25.
http://aaupnet.org/aboutup/issues/pgbrightideas.pdf
86. The University Press Assn.'s Objections.BusinessWeek, 23 May 2005.
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/dnflash/may2005/nf20050523_9039.htm
87. A University Press Leader Has Questions for Google.The Chronicle of Higher
Education, 3 June 2005, A27.
88. Gohring, Nancy. Europe's Authors Still Resist Google Print.InfoWorld, 19 October
2005. http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/10/19/HNgoogleprint_1.html
89. Google
Print
Gets
New
Name.InfoWorld,
17
November
2005.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/05/11/17/HNgoogleprintname_1.html
90. Goldsborough, Reid. Toward a Universal Library.LinkUp Digital, 1 December 2007.
http://www.infotoday.com/linkup/lud120107-goldsborough.shtml
91. Google.
Google
Checks
Out
Library
Books.http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/print_library.html
92. Google, and University Library, University of Michigan. Amendment to Cooperative
Agreement.http://www.lib.umich.edu/mdp/Amendment-to-Cooperative-Agreement.pdf
93. Cooperative
Agreement.http://www.lib.umich.edu/mdp/um-google-cooperativeagreement.pdf
94. Gorman, G. E. Google Print and the Principle of Functionality.Online Information
Review 31, no. 2 (2007): 113-115.
95. Grafton, Anthony. Apocalypse in the Stacks? The Research Library in the Age of
Google.Daedalus 138, no. 1 (2009): 87-98.
96. Graham, Jefferson. Google Print Project Inspires Fans, Fears.USA Today, 17 October
2005.
http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2005-10-17-googleprint_x.htm
97. Griffin, Daniel. Yahoo Rejects Google Subpoena.Information World Review, 16
January 2007. http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-world-review/news/2172648/yahoorejects-google-subpoena
98. Grimmelmann, James. The Google Book Search Settlement: Ends, Means, and the
Future
of
Books.SSRN,
2009.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1388846
99. How
to
Fix
the
Google
Book
Search
Settlement.SSRN,
2009.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1363843
100. Grogg, Jill E., and Beth Ashmore. Google Book Search Libraries and Their Digital
Copies.Searcher
15,
no.
4
(2007):
18-27.
http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/apr07/Grogg_Ashmore.shtml
101. Hafner, Katie. At Harvard, a Man, a Plan and a Scanner.The New York Times, 21
November 2005, C1. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/21/business/21harvard.html
102. Libraries Shun Deals to Place Books on Web.The New York Times, 22 October
2007, A1. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/22/technology/22library.html
103. Hane, Paula J. Anti Google Book Settlement Organizations Band Together in Open
Book Alliance.Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 27 August
2009.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Anti-Google-Book-SettlementOrganizations-Band-Together-in-Open-Book-Alliance-55861.asp
14
104. Update on the Google Book Settlement.Information Today NewsBreaks & the
Weekly News Digest, 2 July 2009. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/Spotlight/Updateon-the-Google-Book-Settlement-54998.asp
105. Hanratty, Elisabeth. Google Library: Beyond Fair Use?Duke Law & Technology
Review,
no.
10
(2005).
http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0010.html
106. Hausman, Jerry A., and J. Gregory Sidak. Google and the Proper Antitrust Scrutiny
of
Orphan
Books.SSRN,
2009.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1462282
107. Helft, Miguel. 11th-Hour Filings Oppose Google’s Book Settlement.New York
Times,
8
September
2009.
B4.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/09/technology/internet/09google.html
108. U.S. Presses Antitrust Inquiry into Google Book Settlement.New York Times, 10
June
2009,
B5.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/10/technology/companies/10book.html
109. Helm, Burt. For Google, Another Stormy Chapter.BusinessWeek, 22 September
2005.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/sep2005/tc20050922_5949_tc024.ht
m
110. A Google Project Pains Publishers.BusinessWeek, 23 May 2005.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/may2005/tc20050523_9472_tc024.
htm
111. Google's
Escalating
Book
Battle.BusinessWeek,
20
October
2005.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/oct2005/tc20051020_802225.htm
112. Google's Great Works in Progress.BusinessWeek, 22 December 2005.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/dec2005/tc20051222_636880.htm
113. Google's
Plan
Doesn't
Scan.BusinessWeek,
12
August
2005.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/aug2005/tc20050812_4324_tc119.h
tm?campaign_id=topStories_ssi_5
114. A New Page in Google's Books Fight.BusinessWeek, 22 June 2005.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/jun2005/tc20050622_4076_tc119.ht
m
115. Helft, Miguel, and Motoko Rich. Lawyer and Author Adds His Objections to Settling
the Google Book Lawsuit.New York Times, 19 August 2009, B2.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/19/technology/internet/19google.html
116. Helm, Burt, and Hardy Green. Google This: 'Copyright Law'.BusinessWeek, 6 June
2005. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_23/b3936043_mz011.htm
117. Herring, Mark Y. Don't Get Goggle-Eyed Over Google's Plan to Digitize.The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 11 March 2005, B20.
118. Hetcher, Steven. The Half-Fairness of Google's Plan to Make the World's Collection
of Books Searchable.Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review 13,
no. 1 (2006): 1-76. http://www.mttlr.org/volthirteen/hetcher.pdf
119. Orphan Works and Google's Global Library Project.Wake Forest Intellectual
Property Law Journal 8, no. 1 (2007): 1-38.
120. Hirschorn, Michael. The Hapless Seed.The Atlantic Monthly 299, no. 5 (2007): 134139. http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200706/google-book-project
121. Holahan, Catherine. Microsoft's Copyright Assault on Google.BusinessWeek, 7
March
2007.
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/mar2007/tc20070307_107860.htm
122. Jacsó, Péter. Amazon, Google Book Search, and Google Scholar.Online 32, no. 2
(2008): 51-54.
123. Janes, Joseph. Google Book Search: Evil or Misunderstood?American Libraries 37,
no.
1
(2006):
74.
http://www.ala.org/ala/alonline/inetlibrarian/2006columns/internetJan06.cfm
124. Jeanneney, Jean-Noël. Google and the Myth of Universal Knowledge: A View from
Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
125. Jensen, Michael. Presses Have Little to Fear From Google.The Chronicle of Higher
Education, 8 July 2005, B16. http://chronicle.com/free/v51/i44/44b01601.htm
126. Jeweler, Robin. The Google Book Search Project: Is Online Indexing a Fair Use
Under Copyright Law?In Focus on the Internet, edited by B. G. Kutais, 95-100.
Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers, 2006.
127. Johnson, Richard K. In Google's Broad Wake: Taking Responsibility for Shaping the
Global Digital Library.ARL: A Bimonthly Report on Research Library Issues and
15
Actions from ARL, CNI, and SPARC, no. 250 (2007): 1-15.
http://www.arl.org/bm~doc/arlbr250digprinciples.pdf
128. Joint, Nicholas. The Google Book Settlement and Academic Libraries.Library
Review 58, no. 5 (2009): 333-340.
129. Jones, Philip. ALPSP Calls for 'Urgent' Google Meeting.Information World Review,
16
September
2005.
http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-worldreview/news/2142402/alpsp-calls-urgent-google
130. Jordan, Lawrence. The Google Book Search Project Litigation: 'Massive Copyright
Infringement' or 'Fair Use'?Michigan Bar Journal 86, no. 9 (2007): 32-34.
http://www.michbar.org/journal/pdf/pdf4article1210.pdf
131. JTW. Digital Library Controversy: Google Gives Ground at EU Hearing.Der
Spiegel,
11
September
2009.
http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/0,1518,647700,00.html
132. Kanter, James, and Eric Pfanner. Google Tackles Fears on Rights in Book Deal.New
York
Times,
7
September
2009.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/08/technology/internet/08books.html
133. Karle-Zenith, Anne. Google Book Search and the University of Michigan.E-LIS,
2006. http://eprints.rclis.org/archive/00008800/
134. Keegan, Victor. A Bookworm's Delight.The Guardian, 21 October 2005.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/economicdispatch/story/0,12498,1597790,00.html
135. Keller, Michael A. Mountain View: the Agreement among Google, Publishers, and
Authors.College
and
Research
Libraries
70,
no.
1
(2009):
56.http://www.ala.org/ala/mgrps/divs/acrl/publications/crljournal/2009/jan/editorial_jan
09.cfm
136. Kelly, Kevin. Scan This Book!The New York Times Magazine, 14 May 2006.
137. Kiernan, Vincent. Prolific Author Tells Google to Remove His Books from Its
Library-Scanning Project.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 21 October 2005, A42.
138. Kohler, David, This Town Ain't Big Enough for the Both of Us—Or Is It?
Reflections on Copyright, the First Amendment and Google's Use of Others'
Content.SSRN, 2007. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1010768
139. Kupferschmid, Keith. Are Authors and Publishers Getting Scroogled?Information
Today 22, no. 11 (2005). http://www.infotoday.com/IT/dec05/Kupferschmid.shtml
140. Labi, Aisha. A French Library Leader Urges a European Response.The Chronicle of
Higher Education, 3 June 2005, A27.
141. Google Library Project Is Culturally Biased, Says French National Librarian.The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 4 March 2005, A35.
142. Lackie, Robert J. From Google Print to Google Book Search: The Controversial
Initiative and Its Impact on Other Remarkable Digitization Projects.The Reference
Librarian 49, no. 1 (2008): 35-53.
143. Google's Print and Scholar Initiatives The Value of and Impact on Libraries and
Information Services.Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10, no. 3/4 (2005): 57-70.
144. Last, Jonathan V. Google and Its Enemies.The Weekly Standard, 13, no. 13 (2007).
http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/014/431afruv.asp
145. Lavoie, Brian, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, and Lorcan Dempsey. Anatomy of
Aggregate Collections: The Example of Google Print for Libraries.D-Lib Magazine 11,
no. 9 (2005). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september05/lavoie/09lavoie.html
146. Lesk, Michael. Should Indexing Be Fair Use? The Battle over Google Book
Search.IEEE Security and Privacy Magazine 4, no. 2 (2006): 80-83.
147. Lundeen, K. The Google Library Litigation and the Fair Use Doctrine.UMKC Law
Review 75, no. 1 (2006): 265-282.
148. MacColl, John. Google Challenges for Academic Libraries.Ariadne, no. 46 (2006).
http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue46/maccoll/
149. Mahony, Honor. Europe's Heated Reaction to Google Books.BusinessWeek, 9
September
2009.
http://www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/content/sep2009/gb2009099_774179.htm
150. Mann, Thomas. Google Print vs. Onsite Collections: Don't Send Your Paper Copies
Off to Remote Storage Just Yet.American Libraries 36, no. 7 (2005): 45-6.
http://www.ala.org/ala/alonline/resources/selectedarticles/googlevsonsite.pdf
151. Manuel, Kate M. The Google Library Project: Is Digitization for Purposes of Online
Indexing Fair Use Under Copyright Law? Washington, DC: Congressional Research
Service, 2009. http://assets.opencrs.com/rpts/R40194_20090205.pdf
152. Markoff, John, and Edward Wyatt. Google Is Adding Major Libraries to Its
Database.
The
New
York
Times,
14
December
2004,
A1.
http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/14/technology/14google.html
16
153. Martens, China. Update: Google Provides Opt-Out for Publishers.Computerworld,
15 August 2005. http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;548632850
154. Mathes, Adam. The Point of Google Print.Google Blog, 19 October 2005.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/10/point-of-google-print.html
155. Mattioli, Michael R. Opting Out: Procedural Fair Use. bepress Legal Series, 2006.
http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1059/
156. Miller, Rebecca. Google Deal Debate: Strengthened Partnerships or Diminished
Access?Library
Journal,
23
December
2008.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6624787.html
157. Milliot, Jim. AAP Sues Google. Publishers Weekly, 19 October 2005.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6275614.html
158. Authors, Publishers, Google Embrace Settlement. Publishers Weekly, 28 October
2008. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6609308.html
159. Authors Guild Again Touts Benefits of Google Settlement for Members. Publishers
Weekly, 14 August 2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6676787.html
160. Consumer Group Protests Google Settlement. Publishers Weekly, 6 April 2009.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6649670.html
161. Drummond Talks Google Settlement at AAP Meeting. Publishers Weekly, 10 March
2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6643621.html
162. A Fight for Control. Publishers Weekly, 24 October 2005, 4.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6277002.html
163. First Fruits of Google Library Appear. Publishers Weekly, 3 November 2005.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6280794.html
164. Google Expands Book Option Abroad. Publishers Weekly, 31 August 2005.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6252912.html
165. Google Offers Online Pay Plan. Publishers Weekly, 10 March 2006.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6315128.html
166. Google's Book Search Moves Forward. Publishers Weekly, 28 May 2007, 14.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6446718.html
167. Internet Archive Latest to Object to Google Settlement. Publishers Weekly, 17 April
2009. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6652375.html
168. Publishers Monitor Google's 'Continuous Browsing' Feature.Publishers Weekly, 28
January 2008, 4. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6525828.html
169. Milliot, Jim, and Andrew Albanese. Google Deal with Libraries Wins Praise, Raises
Questions.Publishers
Weekly,
20
December
2004,
7.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA488847.html
170. Milliot, Jim, and Sarah Gold. AAP Asks for Google Halt. Publishers Weekly, 20
June 2005. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA609261.html
171. Milliot, Jim, and Steve Zeitchik. Google Begins to Push Google Print Program.
Publishers
Weekly,
11
October
2004,
5,
8.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA470438.html
172. Na, Nari. Testing the Boundaries of Copyright Protection: The Google Books
Library Project and the Fair Use Doctrine. Cornell Journal of Law and Public Policy
16, no. (2007).
173. Neill, Graeme. BA Hits Out at Google Deal. The Bookseller, 11 December 2008.
http://www.thebookseller.com/news/70656-ba-hits-out-at-google-deal.html
174. New, William. Questions Raised about Google Library Project's Impact on
Knowledge Access. Intellectual Property Watch, 26 November 2008. http://www.ipwatch.org/weblog/index.php?p=1332
175. Nunberg. Geoffrey. Google's Book Search: A Disaster for Scholars.The Chronicle of
Higher Education, 31 August 2009. http://chronicle.com/article/Googles-Book-SearchA/48245/?sid=at&utm_source=at&utm_medium=en
176. O'Brien, Kevin J., and Eric Pfanner. Europe Divided on Google Book Deal.New
York
Times,
23
August
2009.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/24/technology/internet/24iht-books.html
177. Oder, Norman. Academics, Citing Public Interest, Plan to Intervene in Google Book
Search
Settlement.Library
Journal,
6
April
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6649587.html
178. After Michigan Amendments to Google Deal, Library Groups Issue Updated 'Guide
for
the
Perplexed.'Library
Journal,
17
June
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6665966.html
179. At Columbia Conference, Harvard's Darnton Asks: Is Google the Elsevier of the
Future?Library
Journal,
18
March
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6644834.html
17
180. At Panel on Google Book Settlement, Support, Criticism, Contentiousness.Library
Journal, 29 January 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6633319.html
181. Fissures Evident in Panel on Google Settlement.Library Journal, 23 July 2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6672661.html
182. Google, 'The Last Library,' and Millions of Metadata Mistakes.Library Journal, 3
September
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6687562.html?nid=2673&source=title&rid=1
407498533
183. Library Groups Step Up Criticism of Google Settlement; Some Academic
Institutions
Support
It.Library
Journal,
3
September
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6687537.html
184. Library Organizations Urge DoJ To Take Proactive Role in Google Book Search
Settlement.Library
Journal,
6
August
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6675219.html
185. More Pushback Against the Google Book Search Settlement.Library Journal, 11
August 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6675916.html
186. NYU's Mandel: Google Book Search Incremental, Transformative,
Worrisome.Library
Journal,
18
March
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6644844.html
187. Organizations Urge Google To Ensure Privacy Protection in Book Search.Library
Journal, 28 July 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6673463.html
188. PW Survey: Librarians On the Fence Regarding Google Settlement.Library Journal,
20 August 2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6678927.html
189. University of Michigan, Library Partners Can Challenge Google Book Search
Pricing
in
Amended
Agreement.Library
Journal,
20
May
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6659681.html
190. Warning of Abuse of Monopoly, Library Groups Ask Court to Closely Monitor
Google
Settlement.Library
Journal,
4
May
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6656242.html
191. Who's Unhappy with Google Book Search Settlement? Some Authors, Many
Photographers.Library
Journal,
3
April
2009.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6649185.html
192. Okano, Ari. Digitized Book Search Engines and Copyright Concerns.Shidler Journal
of
Law,
Commerce
&
Technology
3,
no.
4
(2007).
http://www.lctjournal.washington.edu/Vol3/a013Okano.html
193. Ostrem, Steve. Bibliographic Supernova.Library Journal, 15 February 2008, 132.
http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6529399.html
194. Otake, Tomoko. Google Books Leaves Japan in Legal Limbo.The Japan Times, 22
July 2009. http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nc20090722a1.html
195. Perez, Juan Carlos. Google's Book Search Available in Publisher Sites.InfoWorld, 1
June 2007. http://www.infoworld.com/article/07/06/01/Google-Book-Search-availablein-publisher-sites_1.html
196. Pham, Alex. Google to Allow Booksellers to Profit from Digital Library.Los Angeles
Times, 11 September 2009. http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-books112009sep11,0,6375242.story
197. Picker, Randal C. The Google Book Search Settlement: A New Orphan-Works
Monopoly?SSRN, 2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1387582
198. Pickering, Bobby. Google Clarifies Print Differences in Europe.Information World
Review,
18
October
2005.
http://www.iwr.co.uk/information-worldreview/news/2144054/google-clarifies-print
199. Pignal, Stanley. France to Oppose Google Book Scheme.The Financial Times, 8
September
2009,
10.
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6367c80a-9c0e-11de-b21400144feabdc0.html
200. Pike, George. Google Print and the Fair Use Doctrine.Information Today 22, no. 10
(2005): 17-19.
201. Powell, Christina Kelleher. OPAC Integration in the Era of Mass Digitization: The
MBooks Experience.Library Hi Tech 26, no. 1 (2008): 24-32.
202. Proskine, E. A. Google's Technicolor Dreamcoat: A Copyright Analysis of the
Google Book Search Library Project.Berkeley Technology Law Journal 21, no. 1
(2006): 213-240.
203. Quint, Barbara. 1923-1963: Google Book Search Targeting More Books for Public
Domain?Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 26 June 2008.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReader.asp?ArticleId=49685
18
204. CORRECTIONS: Google Print Not All I Said It Was.Information Today
NewsBreaks
&
the
Weekly
News
Digest,
29
August
2005.
http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050829-1.shtml
205. Google and Research Libraries Launch Massive Digitization Project.Information
Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 20 December 2004.
http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041220-2.shtml
206. Google Beta Tests Book Search Service.Information Today NewsBreaks & the
Weekly
News
Digest,
22
December
2003.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16555
207. Google Book Search Adds Big, Brave Partner: The University of
California.Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 14 August
2006. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=17375
208. Google Book Search Expanding Outlets in Deal With Sony.Information Today
NewsBreaks
&
the
Weekly
News
Digest,
30
March
2009.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Google-Book-Search-ExpandingOutlets-in-Deal-With-Sony-53225.asp
209. The Google Book Search Settlement: 'The Devil's in the Details.'Information Today
NewsBreaks
&
the
Weekly
News
Digest,
3
November
2008.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbReader.asp?ArticleId=51429
210. Google Library Project Hit by Copyright Challenge from University
Presses.Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 31 May 2005.
http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050531-2.shtml
211. Google Opens Public Domain Books for Downloading, Michigan Launches
MBooks.Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 5 September
2006. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=18125
212. Google Print Expands Access to Books with Digitization Offer to All
Publishers.Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 6 October
2004. http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16357
213. Google Slows Library Project to Accommodate Publishers.Information Today
NewsBreaks
&
the
Weekly
News
Digest,
15
August
2005.
http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb050815-1.shtml
214. Google's Library Project: Questions, Questions, Questions.Information Today
NewsBreaks
&
the
Weekly
News
Digest,
27
December
2004.
http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb041227-2.shtml
215. 'Hundreds of Titles,' 'Dozens of Publishers' Magazines Going Into Google Book
Search.Information Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 18 December
2008.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Hundreds-of-Titles-Dozens-ofPublishersMagazines-Going-Into-Google-Book-Search-51957.asp
216. Michigan Libraries Support Google Book Search Settlement Plans.Information
Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 26 May 2009.
http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/NewsBreaks/Michigan-Libraries-Support-GoogleBook-Search-Settlement-Plans-53950.asp
217. The Other Shoe Drops: Google Print Sued for Copyright Violation.Information
Today NewsBreaks & the Weekly News Digest, 3 October 2005.
http://www.infotoday.com/newsbreaks/nb051003-1.shtml
218. To
the
Ozone
and
Beyond.Searcher
15,
no.
3
(2007).
http://www.infotoday.com/searcher/mar07/voice.shtml
219. Who the Heck Is Tristram Shandy? Or What's Not Wrong With Google Book
Search?Information Today 24, no. 9 (2007): 7-8.
220. Read, Brock. Some Publishers Warm to Google Book Search.The Wired Campus, 5
June 2007. http://chronicle.com/wiredcampus/article/2122/some-publishers-warm-togoogle-book-search
221. Richardson, Anna. German Publisher Retracts Copyright Case against
Google.Information World Review, 29 June 2006. http://www.iwr.co.uk/informationworld-review/news/2159366/german-publisher-retracts
222. Rogers, Douglas L. Access to Knowledge as a Bridge over the Troubled Waters of
Copyright Fair Use—From Jefferson to Mandela to Google.bepress Legal Series, 2006.
http://law.bepress.com/expresso/eps/1649/.
223. Romman, K. H. The Google Book Search Library Project: A Market Analysis
Approach to Fair Use.Houston Law Review 43, no. 3 (2006): 807-846.
224. Roush, Wade. The Infinite Library: Does Google's Plan to Digitize Millions of Print
Books Spell the Death of Libraries; or Their Rebirth?Technology Review 108, no. 5
(2005): 54-59. http://www.technologyreview.com/Infotech/14408/
19
225. Rushe, Dominic. Google Plots E-Books Coup.The Sunday Times, 21 January 2007.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/article1294870.ece
226. Sag, Matthew. The Google Book Settlement and the Fair Use Counterfactual.SSRN,
2009. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1437812
227. Samuelson, Pamela. Legally Speaking: The Dead Souls of the Google Booksearch
Settlement.SSRN,
16
April
2009.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1387782
228. Sandler, Mark. Disruptive Beneficence The Google Print Program and the Future of
Libraries.Internet Reference Services Quarterly 10, no. 3/4 (2005): 5-22.
229. Google Print: Shipwreck or Clear Sailing?Charleston Advisor 7, no. 2 (2005): 45-47.
230. Sanfilippo, Tony. Why Can't We Be Friends?Publishers Weekly, 26 September
2005, 94. http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6259745.html
231. Sarno, David. Sony Sees Google Books Settlement as 'Profoundly Positive.'Los
Angeles
Times,
28
August
2009.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/technology/2009/08/sony-endorses-google-bookssettlement.html
232. Savirimuthu, Joseph. Legal Reflections on the Google Print Library Project.Journal
of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 1, no. 12 (2006): 801-808.
233. Sayer, Peter. Google Scans French Literature for Book Search Support.InfoWorld,
17
March
2006.
http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/03/17/76592_HNgooglebookfrance_1.html
234. Update: French Publishers Join Google Booksearch Lawsuit.InfoWorld, 31 October
2006. http://www.infoworld.com/article/06/10/31/HNfrenchjoingooglesuit_1.html
235. Shah, M. Fair Use and the Google Book Search Project: The Case for Creating
Digital Libraries.Commlaw Conspectus 15, no. 2 (2007): 569-614.
236. Smith, Adam M. Making Books Easier to Find.Google Blog, 11 August 2005.
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/08/making-books-easier-to-find.html
237. St. Clair, Gloriana. The Million Book Project in Relation to Google.Journal of
Library Administration 47, no. 1/2 (2008): 151-163.
238. Staff. Google Print Goes Live.Publishers Weekly, 6 October 2004.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA469733.html
239. Stripling, Jack. Still Searching.Inside Higher Ed, 29 October 2008.
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2008/10/29/google
240. Su, Anna Liza L. The Case Against Google Print: Understanding the Scope and
Limits of Fair Use in the Digital Age.Ateneo Law Journal 50, no. (2006).
241. Suarez, Christopher A. Proactive FTC/DOJ Intervention in the Google Book Search
Settlement: Defending Our Public Values, Protecting Competition.SSRN, 2009.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1409824
242. Suber, Peter. Does Google Library Violate Copyright?SPARC Open Access
Newsletter, no. 90 (2005). http://www.earlham.edu/%7Epeters/fos/newsletter/10-0205.htm#google
243. Taylor, Nick. . . . But Not at Writers' Expense.The Washington Post, 22 October
2005,
A21.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2005/10/21/AR2005102101510.html?nav=hcmodule
244. Thatcher, Sanford G. Fair Use in Theory and Practice: Reflections on Its History and
the Google Case.Journal of Scholarly Publishing 37, no. 3 (2006): 215-229.
245. The Google Settlement: Boon, Boondoggle, or Mixed Blessing?Against the Grain
21, no. 1 (2009): 69-72.
246. Thompson, Bill. Defending Google's Licence to Print.BBC News, 10 October 2005.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/4320642.stm
247. Toobin, Jeffrey. Google's Moon Shot: Copyright and the Universal Library.New
Yorker,
5
February
2007,
30-35.
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/02/05/070205fa_fact_toobin
248. Travis, Hannibal, Google Book Search and Fair Use: iTunes for Authors, or Napster
for Books?SSRN, 2006. http://ssrn.com/abstract=944048
249. Turvey, Tom. A Perspective on Google Book Search.Information Today 23, no. 1
(2006): 1, 25.
250. University Library, University of Michigan. UM Library/Google Digitization
Partnership FAQ, August 2005.http://www.lib.umich.edu/files/services/mdp/faq.pdf
251. Vaidhyanathan, Siva. A Risky Gamble with Google.The Chronicle of Higher
Education, 2 December 2005, B7.
252. The Googlization of Everything and the Future of Copyright.University of California
Davis
Law
Review
40,
no.
3
(2007):
1207-1232.
20
http://lawreview.law.ucdavis.edu/issues/Vol40/Issue3/DavisVol40No3_Vaidhyanathan
.pdf
253. VNU Staff. Publishers Call for Library Digitisation Boycott at Book
Fair.Information World Review, 10 March 2006. http://www.iwr.co.uk/informationworld-review/news/2151746/publishers-call-library-digitisation-boycott
254. Walker, Leslie. Google's Goal: A Worldwide Web of Books.Washington Post, 18
May
2006;
D01.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpdyn/content/article/2006/05/17/AR2006051702016.html
255. Wiesmann, Gerrit, and Richard Waters. Germany Seeks to Block Google Book
Deal.The Financial Times, 2 September 2009, 14. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/fa90f2ce972c-11de-83c5-00144feabdc0.html
256. Westin, Cameron W. Is Kelly Shifting Under Google's Feet? New Ninth Circuit
Impact on the Google Library Project Litigation.Duke Law & Technology Review,
Rev. 0002 (2007). http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2007DLTR0002.html
257. Wilhelm, Thomas E. Google Book Search: Fair Use or Fairly Useful
Infringement?Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 33, no. 1 (2006): 107-135.
258. Wilkin, John. BackTalk: HathiTrust and the Google Deal.Library Journal, 15 January
2009. http://www.libraryjournal.com/article/CA6625155.html
259. Williams, Matt. Recent Second Circuit Opinions Indicate that Google's Library
Project
is
Not
Transformative.SSRN,
2007.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1420116
260. Whittall, Zoe. Canadian Authors Mount Last-Minute Opposition to Google Book
settlement.Quill
&
Quire,
4
September
2009.
http://www.quillandquire.com/google/article.cfm?article_id=10849
261. Wojcicki, Susan. Google Print and the Authors Guild.Google Blog, 20 September
2005. http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2005/09/google-print-and-authors-guild.html
262. Wray. Richard. Legal Victory for Google in Library Project.The Guardian, 29 June
2006. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2006/jun/29/news.google
263. Wray. Richard, and Dan Milmo. Publishers Unite against Google.The Guardian, 6
July
2006.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2006/jul/06/pressandpublishing.digitalmedia
264. Wu,Tim. Leggo My Ego.Slate, 17 October 2005. http://slate.msn.com/id/2128094/
265. Wyatt, Edward. Google Opens 8 Sites in Europe, Widening Its Book Search
Effort.The
New
York
Times,
18
October
2005,
C10.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/10/18/technology/18book.html
266. Writers Sue Google, Accusing It of Copyright Violation.The New York Times, 21
September 2005, C3. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/21/technology/21book.html
267. Young, Jeffrey R. From Gutenberg to Google: Five Views on the Search-Engine
Company's Project to Digitize Library Books.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 3
June 2005, A24.
268. In Case Google Bails Out on Its Library Project, Universities Create a Backup.The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 24 October 2008.
269. Publishing Groups Say Google's Book-Scanning Effort May Violate Copyrights.The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 18 February 2005, A35.
270. U. of California Will Provide Millions of Books to Google's Digitization Project.The
Chronicle of Higher Education, 1 September 2006, A59.
271. U. of Michigan Puts Digitized Books Online but Bars Full Text of Copyrighted
Works.The Chronicle of Higher Education, 8 September 2006, A32.
272. Zeitchik, Steven. Google Offers Compromise, But Pubs Say It's Not
Enough.Publishers
Weekly,
12
August
2005.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA634587.html
21
22