Performance of Lead Tungstate Crystals for the CMS Electromagnetic Calorimeter Ioan Dafinei I.N.F.N. Sezione di Roma, Rome ITALY (on behalf of CMS ECAL Collaboration) Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Index 1. PWO general properties 2. PWO properties vs ECAL-CMS requirements 3. survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction 4. Conclusion Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma PWO general properties Luminescence PbWO4 (PWO) blue component green component (400 – 440 nm ; <25ns) (460 – 540 nm ; >100ns) - studied as phosphor since 1979 - promoted scintillator early nineties ρ g/cm 8.26 X0 cm 0.89 3 2.2 Pb2+ intensity (a.u.) 10 0 10 -1 10 -2 10 -3 10 -4 Rm cm τ ns 15 λ emission nm 420 - 2.29 10 -5 LY % of BGO 5 10 -6 α LY %/°C -2 n@ λ emission WO42- ECAL PWO crystals supplier Bogoroditsk Techo Chemical Plant Russia L u mL a ser E xc.QP C 10 WO43- em ision@ 400 nm em ision@ 500 nm laser pulse λexc=308 nm -8 10 -7 10 -6 10 -5 tim e (s) ♥suppressed green component ♥improved radiation hardness Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma PWO properties vs ECAL-CMS requirements high stopping power small X0 small R m high granularity high density and high Z ECAL-CMS BGO PWO CeF3 1.11 0.89 1.68 2.33 2.2 2.63 high energy resolution ve ind i t c a r f e high r ex ! large LY ≈ 100GeV emission spectrum overlapping with spectral sensitivity of APD and VPT APD and VPT (see Q. Ingram’s talk) Bunch separation 25 ns 34 -2 -1 LHC Luminosity 10 cm ·s fast radiation hard BGO PWO CeF3 300 15 30 •light production is not affected •creation of color centers is quenched by appropriate doping Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma PWO properties vs ECAL-CMS requirements PWO crystals needed for ECAL-CMS ca End cap d n E p Barrel Endcap 61200 (34 types) 14648 (1 type) 2.2 - 2.5 (Rm) 3 23 (25.8X0) 22 (24.7X0) Total weight 67.4 tons 22.9 tons Photosensor Avalanche Photo-Diode (Si) Vacuum Photo-Triode No.of Xtals Xtal size (cm) transv: long: el r r Ba Xtals point 3º away from vertex Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction premise 1 at present (ECAL construction phase), the PWO crystal is taken “as it is” i.e. no spectacular modifications of its scintillation properties are expected keep the qualification parameters inside the limits defined by ECAL Collaboration very strict crystal quality control parallel radiation hardness tests find the ways to get the best possible performance from the ECAL modules built with this PWO LY characteristics radiation damage calibration monitoring (see P.S.Roldan’s talk) QC measurements for LY are not routine check but a first step of calibration Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction premise 2 (see R-Y.Zhu talk on calibration and monitoring) calibration - defines the ultimate performance of the ECAL - is influenced by a very large number of factors (electronics gain, APD amplification factor, containment efficiency, etc) besides scintillation characteristics of PWO monitoring the change of PWO crystals transparency during ECAL exploitation phase will be monitored in situ with a laser and a correction to particles signal will be applied: R= where: ∆ BeamSignal ∆ MonitorSignal ∆ BeamSignal ∆ MonitorSignal : fractional decrease in the beam signal : fractional decrease in the light monitoring signal Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction premise 3 Doses in 10 years in ECAL HCAL Barrel ECAL Endcap • dose (kGy) (at photodetector) 0.5 5 2 0.35 1.2 0.2 ECAL Barrel 3 70 20 50 • neutron fluence (/ 1013cm-2) (at photodetector) • dose (kGy) (at shower maximum in crystal) -CERN (l’Hopital de Genève) tests made in: -CERN GIF and H4 -Rome ENEA Casaccia -California Institute of Technology Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at GIF Gamma Irradiation Facility http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/ECAL/GIF/www/ z Irradiation (transversally): Cs137 (0.662 MeV) ; doserates close to LHC conditions – Crystal 1 and 5: 0.20 Gy/h – Crystal 2 and 4: 0.26 Gy/h – Crystal 3: 0.30 Gy/h z Excitation scintillation: SPS e beam (50 GeV) luminescence: UV laser (λ=337±10 nm, 1.55mJ/pulse, t =600 ps) z Monitor longitudinal transmission (LED) λ=450±50 nm, t=500 ns Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at GIF VETO DW1 DW2 BEAM Crystals box Laser fiber LED box Lamp fiber Cooling pipes scan DW3 Crystals Ei S2 X5 beam size: approx. 3cm ~10m ~2m ~1m • crystals are tested in batches of 5 • light detectors are standard APDs • monitoring of different light sources by a PM coupled to a 6th crystal • monitoring of laser by PIN diode • monitoring of gain with a constant charge injected to the amplifiers Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at GIF Measure R coefficients defined as: R(t ) = LED Laser irr 59 SA(t ) − SA(t = 0) SB (t ) − SB (t = 0) t=0 (irradiation start) where A and B correspond to different ways irr 61 to produce the light measured by the APD irr 62 (eg: BEAM and LED) Data analysis: -test pulse correction -temperature correction -normalization (monitor signal) Beam -signal cleaning -normalization to 1 (signal at start) Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at GIF RBEAM/LED RBEAM/LASER RLASER/LED = 1.9 ± 4.2% = 1.6 ± 8.4% = 1.2 ± 9.6% • Crystal to crystal dispersion of R is not significant (inside the errors) • Good reproducibility of mesurements • Good correlation RLASER/LED vs RBEAM/LED σR LASER/LED σR BEAM/LED =9% =5% Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at Caltech studies: Caltech γ–ray Irradiation Facilities 60Co 137Cs luminescence transmittance radiation hardness and recovery light output and decay kinetics steps: (1) (2) (3) Λ = 50 Curie 15, 100, 400 rad/h Λ = 2000 Curie up to 36 Krad/h (see rad.hard dedicated talk of R-Y. Zhu) thermal annealing at 200°C γ-irradiations: 15, 100, 400 and 9k rad/h (until equilibrium) recovery Crystals are kept in dark at 18°C after annealing. Minimum time between annealing and 1st measurement is 48 hours. Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at Caltech type I type II type III crystals are hopefully discarded by ECAL rejection criteria (see P.S.Roldan’s talk) Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at Caltech damage and recovery kinetics ECAL monitoring takes 30 minutes to cover entire calorimeter in situ. (see dedicated talk of R-Y.Zhu) Damage and recovery time constants decide whether the monitoring system can adequately track the changes in light yield Longitudinal transmission (T@440nm) recovery characteristics type I type II t1= ~40 h ; t2= ~80 d t1= ~30 h ; t2= ~50 d In both cases the fastest component is slower than monitoring time Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction PWO crystals tests at Caltech Caltech tests generally confirm the results obtained on PWO during R&D and pre-production no variations in either light output or E longitudinalStransmittance observed 8h TABL after the thermal annealing no modification under γ-ray exposure of RELIABLE either excitation or emission spectra K O G no very short timeRrecovery components IN O IT N O M samples can be divided into 3 types from radiation hardness point of view Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction Detector Performance Group studies on PWO crystals for EE http://agenda.cern.ch/displayLevel.php?fid=4l50 Average light yield at LHC, versus Eta Starting luminosity (1033) 100% High luminosity(1034) Dall total density of the potential color centers 80% 60% 40% Improved radiation tolerance for EE crystals would be of benefit Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction http://cms-project-h4-testbeam-2003.web.cern.ch beam tests at CERN SM0 fixed on the turn table, ready for beam test SPS beam φ 2002 preliminary results η http://polywww.in2p3.fr/actualites/congres/wach4-2002/ Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction beam tests at CERN electron beams irradiation: cumulated doses between 2 and 8 Gray S R = α ⋅ S0 R0 Linear relation between signal and monitor! S: scintillation light signal R: monitoring light signal statistics made on the 20 irradiated crystals σ/µ = 6.1% universality of irradiation slope α (inside 6.1%) α determined with 3% precision and intrinsic dispersion 5% Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Survey of PWO performance during ECAL construction beam tests at CERN 1st irradiation Behavior under LHC cycle conditions 2nd irradiation dose rate: 0.25Gray/h cum.dose: 2.5Gray p o w e r dose rate: 0.18Gray/h cum.dose: 1.8Gray recovery c u t same slope for different irradiations good reproducibility during multiple irradiations and recoveries (LHC cycle) same slope for irradiation and recovery Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Conclusion (1) PWO crystals presently produced at industrial level and used for ECAL modules construction: ♥have optical characteristics (scintillation and transmission) stable enough to guarantee a stability of the final monitoring system at the level of 1.4‰ ♥have the same linear dependence between signal and monitor during multiple irradiations and recoveries (LHC cycle) ♥allow for good reproducibility of relative intercalibration ♥allow relative inter-calibration at the level of 4.5% from routine quality control data (ACCOS machines) Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma Conclusion (2) ♣ Several techniques were put in place aimed at predicting the Lead Tungstate (PWO) crystal performance at the future CMS experiment ♣ They converge to the conclusion that the PWO choice for ECAL-CMS was the good one Ioan Dafinei INFN Sezione di Roma