Strategies for optimised collection of biowaste Enzo Favoino Working Group on Composting And Integrated Waste Management Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Development of source separation of biowaste in the EU • Obligations for biowaste management – NL: compulsory schemes for separate collection – AUT: obligation upon households to either take part in separate collection or to compost in the backyard – GER: KrWKrW-AbfG separate collection widely diffused – Catalunya (Spain): ley 6/95 compulsory for all Municipalities with a pop. > 5000 (recently extended to cover all Municipalities) – SK (Act 24/04): Garden Waste to be separately colelcted by 2006; biowaste by 2010 • Targets – SWE: 35% composting target – ITA, UK: recycling targets acting as drivers Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza What does “OPTIMISED” mean? • High captures • Best quality (low % of contraries) • Avoiding increase of waste arisings • Not incurring incremental costs • Fulfilling diversion targets of the Landfill Directive Is this achievable at all? …all at a same time? 2n d se 98 m .' 00 00 99 99 m .' em .' se ts d 1s 2n 97 98 m .' em .' se ts d 1s 2n 96 97 m .' em .' se ts d 1s 2n em .' 95 96 m .' em .' se ts d 1s 2n 94 95 m .' em .' se ts d 1s 2n m .' 94 93 93 m .' em .' se ts d 1s 2n se 35 ts d em .' 92 40 1s 2n ts 92 m .' em .' se ts d 1s 2n 1s % recycling Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza A remarkable, longlong-lasting effect 55 50 45 Kerbside biowaste collection implemented 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 Time Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Catalunya (Spain), 2000 Total separate Collection Riudecanyes Before implementation 6% After implementation 76% Tiana 6% 57% Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Achievable recycling rates – South Italy Municipality VAIRANO PATENORA COMIZIANO CIMITILE GIFFONI SEI CASALI BAIANO SAN CIPRIANO PICENTINO CASAMARCIANO SAN VITALIANO SALA CONSILINA CAMPOSANO MANOCALZATI Population Recycling rate % Capture organic waste kg/inhab.year 5.930 2.009 7.000 4.086 4.800 6.040 3.600 5.013 13.182 5.640 3.200 78,00% 66,80% 61,80% 60,90% 60,30% 57,70% 54,40% 51,70% 51,00% 43,80% 38,30% 122 123 130 82 79 71 71 137 65 58 78 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Tackling problems • Increase captures of food waste – Fulfill targets of the LFD – Make collection of residuals easier – Achieve a broad optimisation of the collection scheme • Food waste needs frequent collection – Collection rounds for food waste have to be made cheaper ! Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Food waste in residual waste Municipality Altivole Arcade Breda di Piave Casale sul Sile Castello di Godego Cessalto Conegliano Cornuda Giavera del Montello % Food waste 7,82 8,24 7,61 9,42 8,05 6,30 9,40 7,19 6,88 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Optimisation of source separation of BIOWASTE: Key issues • Need to make the system useruser-friendly – Increase participation, enhance captures – Simplify collection of residual waste • Avoid excess deliveries of garden waste – Prevent increase of waste arisings – Optimise conditions for collection of food waste • Tackle FERMENTABILITY (food waste) and VOLUME (garden waste) with different systems Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Purity VS Population Collection at the doorstep 100 11127 12720 9652 34849 4713 30800 7824,192308 5971 19230 11177 16112 4332 23890 98 96 20028 92 44748 50121 Road containers (bring banks) 6832 6893 90 88 9062 6152 6274 86 26475 84 150.000 Population 100.000 50.000 7161 82 0 Purity 119187 10493 94 80 75650 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Increase of waste arisings: to be considered • Increase of packaging • Deliveries of industrial waste inside the MSW collection system • Increasing captures of garden waste 5 kilos (av.) grass clippings typically increased twotwo-fold by leaves, prunings mostly home composted or burned in the past Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Compositional analyses BEFORE implementation D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 Average Kg py (@ 400 kg MSW) Fines 8,7 11,91 12,07 12,65 11,70 11,41 45,62 Food 30,1 26,47 27,48 27,70 29,11 28,17 112,68 37,06 35,99725 37,13789 37,816 38,464 37,30 149,18 1,95 1,64 2,64 10,54 TOTAL food* Garden 3,88 2,23 * Including Food waste + 80% of fines 3,48 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza A potential problem: high captures of yard waste Kilograms/inhabitant.year Garden waste Food waste FORTE DEI MARMI PIETRASANTA SIRTORI SERAVEZZA LIERNA ARESE MONTICELLO BRIANZA ROVELLO PORRO BURAGO DI MOLGORA SAN ROCCO AL PORTO PRESEZZO GUDO VISCONTI VIAREGGIO CORREZZANA USMATE VELATE GESSATE DERVIO CARNATE GAGGIANO 462,62 237,14 227,20 200,29 172,34 120,49 113,59 111,87 108,39 102,51 87,70 84,76 81,56 81,39 81,17 80,96 80,29 79,61 78,45 28,99 21,59 36,69 9,25 0,00 44,38 68,91 0,00 65,08 38,87 63,60 56,60 47,21 47,80 58,60 84,93 25,18 62,14 69,10 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Seasonal fluctuations – garden waste Monthly Collection Trends - Green and Kitchen Biowaste 2.000.000 1.800.000 1.600.000 Green and wood waste Quantity (kg) 1.400.000 1.200.000 1.000.000 800.000 Kitchen biowaste 600.000 400.000 200.000 0 1 2 3 4 5 Monthly quanties collected (aggregate PD1 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Month Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza A rationale for optimisation • Innovative schemes for source separation focusing on intensive collection of food waste – High captures, low costs for collection • High density of food waste alone implies lower costs for its collection – PickPick-up time is much lower with hand hand--picking – open lorries adopted instead of packer trucks Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Biobins - Key problems • The use of biobins may imply high deliveries of garden waste • Bins require mechanical loading • Low density implies adoption of expensive packer trucks – or high costs for transport • Reduced frequency of collection is therefore considered to save money • This impairs captures of food waste – fairly high percentages in residual waste Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Solutions • Adopt smallsmall-size receptacles (at detached houses) – No delivery of garden waste – to be tackled through separate, cheaper schemes – High density of food waste • Fast handhand-picking • Low cost for transport – small lorries needed • Higher frequency for collection possible – Higher captures – Simplified schemes for the collection of residuals Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Tools Buckets • volume: 6.5 to 30 litres • hand-picked • unit pick-up time: 20” - 60” • May be adopted instead of wheelie bins at detached/terraced houses with gardens Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Benefits of small receptacles - 1 • Faster pickpick-up • Cheaper transport • Lower amount of waste to be managed (avoids excess deliveries of garden waste) • Home composting is enhanced • Reduction of costs !! Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Benefits of small receptacles - 2 • Possibility for more frequent collection of food waste • Higher captures • Reduced frequency for collection of residuals • Wider optimisation Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Kitchen waste smells even in cloudy UK Fortnightly organics/residual, but … Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza South Somerset Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Tools -2 • Biobags help keep receptacles clean • Biobags and (comparatively) frequent collection make the system useruser-friendly • Higher captures of food waste, lower percentage in residual waste – Reduced frequency for collection of residual waste Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Collection of garden waste at Civic Amenity sites at the doorstep less frequent than food waste higher participation in home composting programmes Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Collection of dry recyclables Lessons to learn • Hand Hand--sorting might imply higher overall costs commingled paper/plastics collection not much recommendable • Best practice achievable by means of vehicles best suited for different materials Consider density and compactability Avoid fleets with only one type of truck Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Strategies to implement collection of dry recyclables • material-specific collection of separate streams glass paper plastics • “light” multi-material collection paper + plastics + tissues + cans/tins • “heavy” multi-material collection glass + plastics + cans/tins • “combined” collection of dry materials plastics + cans/tins glass + cans/tins Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Costs of MSW management – some general remarks • Increased cost of disposal – Landfill Directive – Incineration Directive + IPPC • Anyway cost of collection may by itself be comparatively low – similar to commingled MSW collection – Savings on disposal Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza East Milan WM District (62% diversion on aggregate) Waste management cost per inhabitant and year 70,00 Euro/year 60,00 50,00 40,00 30,00 20,00 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Year 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza INFA--VHE report (Germany, 2004) INFA Difference to mixed MSW Mixed MSW Residuals Biowaste R+B Rural area kg/inhab/y coll/week coll/cost (€inhab/y) treat./cost (€/inhab/y) treat./cost (€/t) total cost (€/inhab/y) 220 1 9,4 27,5 125 36,9 130 0,5 5,93 16,25 125 22,18 100 0,5 4,63 6 60 10,63 230 1 10,56 22,25 12% -19% 32,81 -11% Urban area kg/inhab/y coll/week coll/cost (€(inhab/y) treat./cost (€/inhab/y) treat./cost (€/t) total cost (€/inhab/y) 270 1 17,88 33,75 125 51,63 225 0,5 14,56 28,13 125 42,685 50 0,5 5,27 3 60 8,27 275 1 19,83 31,13 2% 11% -8% 50,96 -1% 5% Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Collection + transp. costs Municipalities in Verona Province 1998 MEDIA convenzionale 61.090 € 31,55 /inh.y Villafranca San Bonifacio Legnago TRADITIONAL COMMINGLED COLLECTION Bussolengo Cast elnuovo D.G. Casaleone But t apiet ra Mezzane di Sot t o Bevilacqua Angiari MEDIA domiciliarizzat o Sona SOURCE SEPARATION AT THE DOORSTEP € 31,70 /inh.y 62.197 € 32,12 /inh.y S.Mart ino B.A. Fumane MEDIA doppio cont enit ore SOURCE SEPARATION BY MEANS OF ROAD CONTAINER 61.389 P eschiera Oppeano Dolce' 0 20.000 40.000 60.000 80.000 100.000 120.000 Cost (ITL.inhab-1 yr-1) Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza TOOLS AND STRATEGIES TO CUT COSTS Tool Details Reducing pick- Hand pick-up of small up time receptacles much faster than mechanical loading Reduction of the frequency for collection of “Residuals” Effective systems to collect biowaste make its percentage in Residuals less than 15 % Applies where….. … food waste collected separately from garden waste, in small receptacles …captures of FOOD waste are increased Use of bulk Bulk density of food waste …tools for collection lorries instead is much higher of food waste prevent of packer (0.7kg/dm3) than yard deliveries of garden trucks waste waste Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Benefiting from small, cheap lorries (costs per inhabitant, Eur/inh.year) Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Food waste in residual waste Municipality Altivole Arcade Breda di Piave Casale sul Sile Castello di Godego Cessalto Conegliano Cornuda Giavera del Montello % Food waste 7,82 8,24 7,61 9,42 8,05 6,30 9,40 7,19 6,88 Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Guidance Manual for Municipalities, Slovak Republic www.spz.sk/sk/komp/biologicky_odpad_eng.pdf Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Test, assess, disseminate !! • Make results VISIBLE – Point results more meaningful than average ones !! – National awards, NGOs • Analyse residuals ! Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Summary remarks • Separate collection of biowaste a PROVEN strategy • Similar schemes deliver similar results everywhere – MAKE IT HAPPEN ! • Food waste remarkably different from garden waste (fermentability, volume) – adopt “fit for purpose” systems • intensive collection of food waste may deliver high diversion and savings on collection • Process adaptation possible and already widely adopted – – – – – Turning Pretreatment Recycling coarse rejects AD …. Scuola Agraria del Parco di Monza Thank you ! Enzo Favoino [email protected] +39-335-355446 (mobile)