“Debris Flow Risk mitigation by the means of rigid and flexible barriers. Experimental tests and impact analysis” Anna Maria Ferrero, Luigi Canelli Università degli Studi di Parma Giuseppe Mandrone Università degli Studi di Torino Rif. Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2009 RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Despite there is no connection between debris flows frequency and global warming in the Alps, recent studies have concluded that debris flows are significantly increasing at the margin of glaciers (Chiarle et al. 2006) These events are among the largest in Italian Alps. Recently in order to control and mitigate debris and mud flows events, flexible barriers (such as net barriers) have been used. Noteworthy are the similarities between these barriers and the protections used for rock fall events. (Ferrero et al. 2010, Wendeler et al. 2008) For this typology of barriers there is no specific regulation, experimental results on debris flows impact on structures are controversial. Experimental tests Full scale tests Numerical Modelling Understand properly the interaction of Debris Flows with barriers and define a solid and easy to use design method Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 EXPERIMENTAL METHOD Level trasducers 0.400 m^3 35 fps cameras Load cells Rectangular flume (dim. 4 x 0.4 x 0.7 m, inclined 30°) Bottom dumping hopper Barrier (rigid or flexible) Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 EXPERIMENTAL METHOD Properties of the mixture Flows of water saturated sand Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 d50 (m) 0.001 Фg (°) 30 ρs (kg/m3) 2550 ρf (kg/m3) 1000 ρm (kg/m3) 1930 υs 0.6 υf 0.4 hf (m) 0.02÷0.1 v (m/s) 1.8÷5.5 BARRIERS INSTALLED Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 DATA ANALYSES AND FIRST RESULTS Test analyses were conducted measuring: 1. Flow depth at each level trasducers 2. Dynamic Thrust using load cells …estimating: 1. Flow velocity (using image analysis and level trasducers) 2. Froude number of the front Fr f 3. Adimensional impact force ~ F Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 v ghg Fmax 1 g m hg2 2 DATA ANALYSES AND FIRST RESULTS and comparing the obtained value of the adimensional impact force with the following formulations: 1. Momentum balance: F 2. Hungr (1984): m v 2 A (vertical jet-like wave) F 1.5 m v 2 A 3. Campania Region (After Sarno, 1998), Japan F mv2 A 4. Armanini & Scotton (1993): F 4.5hmax A 1 m gh f A 2 Adimensional Formulation 1. 2. 3. Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 4. ~ F 2 Fr f2 ~ F 3Fr f2 ~ F 1 2 Fr f2 ~ F 9 Rigid barrier perpendicular to the channel 600 y = 1.6222x2.1964 R² = 0.811 500 Adimensional Force 400 Measured Adimensional Force Armanini & Scotton (1993) 300 Power tdline Momentum balance Hungr (1984) 200 100 0 0 2 4 6 8 di Parma Università degli Studi Froude Number Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 10 Rigid barrier in vertical position 600 y = 1.0282x2.5982 R² = 0.7959 500 Adimensional Force 400 Measured Adimensional Force Armanini & Scotton (1993) 300 Power tdline Momentum balance Hungr (1984) 200 100 0 0 2 4 Froude Number 6 8 Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 10 Dynamic thrust loading due to the impact of the peak of the sourge (duration 2/10 s) Impulsive load caused by the fall of the reflected wave into the channel (1/40 s) Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 Rigid filter barrier in vertical position 600 500 Adimensional Force 400 Measured Adimensional Force Armanini & Scotton (1993) 300 Momentum balance Hungr (1984) 200 100 0 0 1 2 3 4 Froude Number 5 6 Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 7 8 Net barrier vertical position 600 500 Adimensional Force 400 Measured adimensional force Armanini & Scotton (1993) 300 Momentum balance Hungr (1984) 200 100 0 0 1 2 3 4 Froude Number 5 6 7 Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 8 CONCLUDING REMARKS & FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS Results have shown that even if empirical, Hungr’s formulation (1984) is a solid and easy to use method for the estimation of the dynamic thrust of a debris flow. For channelized flows it has to be taken into account the possibility of an impulsive force due to the impact of the reflected wave into the channel. Filter and flexible barrier do not cause this phenomenon. More tests will be conducted, changing the characteristics of the mixture and trying to evaluate the additional load due to collisional force of a single boulder. Real scale tests will be performed on a flexible net. Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209 Thank you for your attention! Contacts: [email protected] [email protected] Università degli Studi di Parma Progetto ICE D.R. 975 del 26/11/2209