Acoustical parameters ISO 3382 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 1 ISO 3382 acoustical parameters 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 2 From Impulse Response to Sound Decay • Schroeder’s backward integral • Makes it possible to reconstruct the decay of a stationary source g t' dt' by backward integration of the measured impulse response 2 0 B 0 A 0 16 November 2012 t Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) t g 2 t'dt' g2 t'dt' t 3 Schroeder’s BW Integration Pressure Impulse Response Stationary Sound Decay (in dB) Energetic Impulse Response (in dB) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 4 Reverberation time T20 Lp (dB) -5 dB 45 dB -25 dB Time (s) T20 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 5 ISO 3382 Reverberation Time(s) Early Decay Time (EDT): extrapolated from 0 to -10 dB Reverberation Time T10: extrapolated from -5 to -15 dB Reverberation Time T20: extrapolated from -5 to -25 dB Reverberation Time T30: extrapolated from -5 to -35 dB 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 6 Early – Late energy evaluation Useful Energy 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) Detrimental Energy 7 Early-Late parameters Clarity Index C80 (symphonic music): 80ms 2 p τ dτ C80 10 lg 0 2 p τ dτ 80ms Optimal Value = +/- 1 dB Clarity Index C50 (speech): 50ms 2 p τ dτ C50 10 lg 0 2 p τ dτ 80ms 16 November 2012 Optimal Value = +/- 1 dB Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 8 Early-Late parameters 50 ms 2 p d Definition Index D: D 0 100 2 p d 0 Center Time tS: ts 2 p d 0 2 p d 0 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 9 Other acoustical parameters SPL at 10 m • Strenght: G SPL L w 31 dB IACC: t h d h s t d 2 h d d 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 2 h s t d 10 Other acoustical parameters 80ms h d 2 Y Lateral Fraction: J LF 5 ms 80ms h d 2 W 0 ms 80ms h h d Y LFC: J LFC W 5 ms 80ms hW d 2 0 ms 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 11 Spatial analysis by directive impulse responses • • The initial approach was to use directive microphones for gathering some information about the spatial properties of the sound field “as perceived by the listener” Two apparently different approaches emerged: binaural dummy heads and pressure-velocity microphones: Binaural microphone (left) and Pressure-velocity microphone (right) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 12 IACC “objective” spatial parameter • • It was attempted to “quantify” the “spatiality” of a room by means of “objective” parameters, based on 2-channels impulse responses measured with directive microphones The most famous “spatial” parameter is IACC (Inter Aural Cross Correlation), based on binaural IR measurements Left pL() Right pR() 80 ms t p L p R t d 80 ms 0 80 ms 80 ms 0 0 16 November 2012 p 2L d IACC E Max t t 1ms ... 1ms 2 p R t d Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 13 Lateral Fraction (LF) spatial parameter • Another “spatial” parameter is the Lateral Fraction JLF • This is defined from a 2-channels impulse response, the first channel is a standard omni microphone, the second channel is a “figure-of-eight” microphone: Omni ho() Figure of 8 h8() 80ms h8 d 2 J LF 5 ms 80ms ho d 2 0 ms 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 14 Are binaural measurents reproducible? • Experiment performed in anechoic room - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 5 binaural dummy heads 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 15 Are IACC measurements reproducible? • 90° incidence - at low frequency IACC is almost 1, at high frequency the difference between the heads becomes evident IACCe - 90° incidence 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 IACCe 0.6 B&K4100 Cortex Head Neumann 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 Frequency (Hz) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 16 Are IACC measurements reproducible? • Diffuse field - huge difference among the 4 dummy heads IACCe - random incidence 1 0.9 0.8 0.7 IACCe 0.6 B&K4100 Cortex Head Neumann 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 Frequency (Hz) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 17 Are LF measurents reproducible? • Experiment performed in the Auditorium of Parma - same loudspeaker, same source and receiver positions, 4 pressure-velocity microphones 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 18 Are LF measurents reproducible? • At 7.5 m distance, the results already exhibit significant scatter Comparison LF - measure 1 - 7.5m distance 1 Schoeps 0.9 Neumann 0.8 Soundfield B&K 0.7 LF 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 Frequency (Hz) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 19 Are LF measurents reproducible? • At 25 m distance, the scatter is even larger Comparison LF - measure 2 - 25m distance 1 Schoeps 0.9 Neumann 0.8 Soundfield B&K 0.7 LF 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 16000 Frequency (Hz) 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 20 The Aurora Acoustical Parameters plugin 16 November 2012 Acoustical Parameters (ISO 3382) 21