DIMENSIONE EUROPEA DEGLI
STUDI
e
PROGRAMMI DI STUDIO
INTEGRATI
INCONTRO DI
APPROFONDIMENTO SUL
PROCESSO DI BOLOGNA
Roma, 27-28 maggio, 2005
LF Donà dalle Rose, Università di
Padova, Italia
www.bolognaprocess.it
PROLOGO (anni ‘80 e ‘90)
• Joint study programs (pre-Erasmus)
• 1987 - 1995 PIC ERASMUS
– mobilità
– Curriculum Development
– IP-Intensive Programmes
• 1995 - ….. Socrates-Erasmus
– Dimensione europea: Dichiarazione di Politica Europea
– strumenti progettuali simili ad Erasmus, con in più lo
strumento delle Reti Tematiche
• Reti spontanee di università
• Jean Monnet Project
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
Nella Dichiarazione di Bologna, il sesto obiettivo
dei Ministri è:
Promozione della necessaria dimensione europea
dell'istruzione superiore, con particolare
riguardo a:
– sviluppo dei curricula,
– cooperazione fra istituzioni,
– schemi di mobilità,
– programmi integrati di studio,
– formazione e ricerca.
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
• PRAGA 2001
(A) i corsi di studio congiunti
In order to further strengthen the important European
dimensions of higher education and graduate
employability Ministers called upon the higher
education sector to increase the development of
modules, courses and curricula at all levels with
”European” content, orientation or organisation. This
concerns particularly modules, courses and degree
curricula offered in partnership by institutions from
different countries and leading to a recognized joint
degree.
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
• PRAGA 2001
(B) la capacità di attrazione della EHEA
• un nuovo obiettivo:
– Promoting the attractiveness of the European Higher
Education Area (EHEA)
• come?
–
–
–
–
A common framework of qualifications
coherent quality assurance
accreditation /certification mechanisms
increased information efforts
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
da PRAGA 2001 a Berlino 2003
• 2 seminari di Bologna sui Joint Degrees
(Stoccolma e Mantova)
• la EUA promuove il progetto pilota sui Joint
Masters  “10 Golden rules”
• il Coimbra Group mette a punto un Glossario
di termini utili
• lancio di Erasmus Mundus
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
• BERLINO 2003
(A) elementi irrinunciabili di un Joint Degree
– mobilità studentesca
– apprendimento delle lingue (language policy)
(B) impegno a rimuovere i vincoli legali che si oppongono
al rilascio del titolo congiunto
oggi su 25 paesi UE (consultzione Erasmus Mundus),
10 possono rilasciare,
4 possono (previa decisione della istituzione (IE,UK) o decisione case by
case (DK,HU)
1 “non automatico” (FR)
7 non possono (EE, LV,LT, NL, SE)
3 situazione non dichiarata (CY, LUX, MT)
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
da Berlino 2003 a Bergen 2005
• 1 seminario di Bologna sui Joint Degrees
(Stoccolma)
• Erasmus Mundus comincia a funzionare:
definizione di “integrated study programme”
–
–
–
–
Joint criteria for admission and examination:
Course integration:
Mobility
Guaranteed award of a recognised joint, or a double or a
multiple degree upon graduation:
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
da Berlino 2003 a Bergen 2005
due esigenze sono prioritarie per i corsi congiunti:
– essere saldamente ancorati nelle istituzioni
partner
• procedure amministrativo-accademiche dettagliate e
innovative
– essere oggetto di adeguate valutazioni di
qualità
• metodologia Tuning per il miglioramento della qualità
• EUA-European Masters New Evaluation Methodology
LE TAPPE DEL PROCESSO DI
BOLOGNA
• BERGEN 2005
(A) rinnovata attenzione ai joint degrees:
– testi sussidiari alla Convenzione di Lisbona
– futuro stocktaking riguarderà anche “the awarding and
recognition of joint degrees, including at the doctorate level”
(B) la attractiveness viene collegata anche a:
– ricerca e formazione alla ricerca
– dimensione sociale del processo di Bologna
(C) adozione dello EQF- European Qualification
Framewok
UN CASO DI BUONA
PRATICA
Procedura in 21 punti per il rilascio del
Diploma di Titolo Congiunto
a cura soprattutto delle università di Deusto, Bochum, Venezia e Padova
THE MODEL of E.MA - VENICE
European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and
Democratisation (E.MA for short)
a consortium of partner universities, out of which
• SOME are willing and can confer a JDD - Joint Degree
Diploma  INNER CIRCLE INSTITUTIONS
• OTHERS (even if willing) cannot confer a JDD
 OUTER CIRCLE INSTITUTIONS
POINTS and STEPS in the PROCEDURE for
CONFERRING the JDD – JOINT DEGREE DIPLOMA
RED
= academic /
BLUE =
legal / BLACK = administrative aspects
(much of overlap is possible)
_______________
1. Nature of the E.MA network and Quality Assurance
2. Academic characterisation of the Joint Degree-Course and
of the JDD
3. Name of the Joint Degree and type of Degree/Qualification
in each country
4. General administrative co-ordination of the Degree-Course
 the CO-ORDINATING CENTRE
POINTS and STEPS in the PROCEDURE -2
5. Special relationship: A special relationship is established between the Coordinating Centre and the Inner Circle Institutions (ICIs), in order to anchor
firmly the Joint Programme in those institutions. In addition to support the
ICIs with respect to students’ enrolment (point 9 below), insurance (point 11)
and fee collection (point 12), the CC will transfer to each of the ICIs (at the
right times of the Academic Year):
a. the agreed part of the tuition fee (see again point 12 below)
b. that part of the budget for the Joint Programme, which may serve to pay
the E.MA teachers. See also point 17 below.
c. a complete list of all the teachers contributing to the E.MA degree-course
educational activities in the involved Academic Year
d. the career records of each successful student (including a copy of the
E.MA thesis), before the final examination takes place (transfer to the
University of first enrolment only, in order to carry out the needed
previous administrative check).
e. the completed career of each graduate, including a copy of the related
Joint Diploma Supplement (see also point 16 below).
6. Annual Call
POINTS and STEPS in the PROCEDURE – 3
7. Prerequisites for Access to the Degree Course
8. Selection and Admission of the students
9. Enrolment at the Universities of the Inner Circle
10. Certificate of “joint enrolment”
11. Insurance
12. Students’ fee
13. Student mobility: during the second semester, the
status of a student moving to an Inner Circle Institution is
“already jointly enrolled” (see point 9); the status of a
student moving to an Institution out of the Inner Circle is
“exchange student”.
14. Responsibility towards the students and Insurance of
the students
POINTS and STEPS in the PROCEDURE - 4
15. Admission to the final examination
16. Registrar Office(s): The CC will keep a record of the Academic Career of
each student, year by year. Each career, when completed and including the
draft JOINT DIPLOMA SUPPLEMENT, will be transmitted to each Inner
Circle Institution, in order to keep full track there of the jointly conferred
degree [e.g. in the appropriate archives (at each University)]. In order to make
use of the same Registration Number in the ICI’s archives, it is agreed that
the ICIs will register on their own archives the degree diplomas according to
the initials “E.MA” followed by a progressive number.
17. Payment of Teachers
18. Structure, Language and Graphical Lay-out of the JDD:
 FOLLOWING SLIDES
19. Signatures on the Joint Degree Diploma
20. Role of the E.MA partners not belonging to the Inner
Circle (RECOGNITION declared in the DS
 a JOINT RECOGNITION DIPLOMA?)
MEANING OF
EACH ROW
Official names
and logos of the
inner circle
partners
Common name of
the Joint Degree
or qualification
TEMPLATE
for the
JDD
Name of the
student
Signature of the
Rector or
Delegate of the
Rector
Logo of the European Union
Ruhr-University
Bochum
University of
Deusto,
Bilbao
University of
Padua
University
Cà Foscari
of Venice
JOINT DIPLOMA
EUROPEAN MASTER’S DEGREE
In
HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIZATION
Conferred on ………………………………………….,
Born ………………., in ……………………………...,
Attending and passing the examinations to the corresponding
degree course in the
Academic Year 2003/2004
Official name of the
national
degree/qualification
corresponding to the
joint degree
Master di I°
livello (DM
509/1999)
Rector/delegate
University Cà
Foscari of
Venice
Master di I°
livello (DM
509/1999)
Space available for
administrative
references
Resolution of the
Academic Senate
n° …..,
Date …….
Resolution of the
Academic Senate
n° …..,
Date …….
Place and date of
Award/Registrati
on number
E.MA universities
and E.MA
supporting
institutions (except
EU already
mentioned)
Organization of
the course
Rector/delegate RuhrUniversity Bochum
Rector/delegate
University of
Deusto, Bilbao
Venice, …………………,
Rector/delegat
e University of
Padua
Reg.No.:
E.MA - ……
within the framework of the E.MA Programme
LOGOs of the 29 E.MA universities
+ logos of
Municipality of Venice, Region of Veneto, UNESCO, UNHCHR
organized in co-operation with
EIUC logo
HOW
IT LOOKS
LIKE
THE
2003-04
JDD
URKUNDE UBER DIE ERLANGUNG DER
DOKTORWURDE
DIPLOMA DI DOTTORE DI
RICERCA IN UOMO E AMBIENTE
Albert-Ludwigs-Universltat Freiburg
Università degli Studi di Padova
Dottore di Ricerca
Doktor der Naturwlssenschaften
8esch/u.. dea Promolionsausschus... vom 12.02.2004
Verbale del CcI/egIo del Docenti del 13. 10. 2003
CONFERITO A
NATO IL ……………A …….CHE HA PRESENTATO LA DISSERTAZIONE DELLA TESI E SUPERATO L'ESAME FINALE DEL CORSO DI
DOTTORATO IN COTUTELA IN DATA 24 FEBBRAIO 2004
DER TITEL WIRD VERLIEHEN AN
GEBOREN AM .............IN ...............
NACHDEM ER DIE DISSERTATION VERTEIDIGT UND DIE MONDLICHE PROFUNG DER PROMOTION IN GEMEINSAMER
BETREUUNG BESTANDEN HAT. AM 24. FEBRUAR 2004
Der Dekan der Faku~AI fOr Forst- und Umweltwissenschalten (UnlversnAt Freiburg)
Coordinatore del Dottoralo in Uomo e Ambiente (Università degn Studi di Padova)
I am honoured to be invited to comment on your initiative from the
perspective of international recognition of qualifications. Let me start
by stating that such an initiative of setting up a joint degree and joint
diploma deserves all possible encouragement. It is an example of
recognition in practice in its finest form, from which student mobility
in Europe can only benefit.
I can whole-heartedly support the conclusion of the Italian NARIC that
is mentioned in the letter and endorse the proposed procedure. In my
opinion it contains the elements necessary from the point of view of
foreign credential evaluators or admissions officers.
”Divis, Jindra”, Dutch NARIC,
September 2003